• Comment (14)

On Libya, Give Obama Credit Where Credit is Due

October 20, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Libyan strongman Muammar Qadhafi is dead.

As reported Thursday by Reuters, the dictator was "killed by fighters who overran his home town and final bastion on Thursday. His bloodied body was stripped and displayed around the world from cell phone video."

Good riddance. And it's appropriate to give President Barack Obama at least some portion of the credit. His decision to have the United States back and participate in NATO efforts to drive Qadhafi from power was critical to the Libyan dictator's eventual elimination.

[See photos of Muammar Gadhafi]

Qadhafi was ousted from his citadel by rebels receiving support from the west, essentially on the theory that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." He had for years supported terroristgroups that attacked symbols of the United States, making him a continual danger even after he agreed—in the aftermath of the Iraq War—to turn over to the United States the materials that comprised his nascent nuclear weapons program.

He was also not a friend to America's major allies, especially Israel. He may have changed his tactics in the waning days of his regime but that does not mean he changed his sentiments, even as he sought to be accepted back into the community of civilized nations.

[See photos of unrest in Libya.]

Qadhafi's departure from the scene is not necessarily all good news, however. We know far too little about the composition or intents of the now victorious rebel forces—whether or not, for example, they are small "D" democrats committed to ideals like pluralism and personal liberty. Even if they are there is no guarantee those ideals will prevail, which means the United States and the other NATO countries must not be quick to withdraw. Otherwise the government that eventually comes to power, as was the case in Iran after the fall of the Shah, ends up being no better and is in fact far worse than the one it replaced where U.S. strategic and security interests are concerned and from the standpoint of individual freedom. Having gotten in for the proverbial "penny" the United States is now in for "a pound," committed to involvement in Libya at least for the foreseeable future.

Tags:
Muammar Qadhafi,
Obama administration,
Libya

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What credit, Obama hid behind the French of all people! He had absolutely nothing to do with the overthrow and if he did, he should be chastized because what is happening in Libya is not in our best interest!

rbcintexas of TX 9:56PM October 25, 2011

Oh, come on. We carried out an undeclared war on a government we were giving aid to and, in the process, liberated some 20,000 shoulder launched missiles. These, and your "in for a pound" will cost us dearly in the future.

Enemies of our enemies are not necessarily friends.

Alex Newton of TX 2:23PM October 25, 2011

Give him what the left gave President Reagan when HE tried. They whined and moaned about "international law". SO what changed with the leftys?

Herr Stig of MA 2:15PM October 25, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement