• Comment (31)

Mississippi Voters May Change Abortion Debate

October 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print

The question of when life begins may be given needed clarity this November as voters in Mississippi are asked to render judgment on an initiative that would define "personhood."

The amendment would, if enacted, add "The term 'person' or 'persons' shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning, or the functional equivalent thereof" to the state constitution.

Mississippi citizens collected over 130,000 signatures, 40,000 more than were needed to qualify it for the Nov. 8, 2011 ballot.

[See the month's best political cartoons.]

According to Keith Mason, the president of Personhood USA--a group backing the initiative--its purpose "is to guarantee the equal and inalienable rights of every human being, no matter their age or any number of accidental characteristics such as race, gender, disability, or method of reproduction."

The measure is drawing strong support across the state, with some polls showing an excess of 80 percent support for it. It has also been endorsed by Lt. Gov. Phil Bryant, who is running for governor, Attorney General Jim Hood, and both of their opponents in the general election. It also enjoys wide bi-partisan support among candidate for the state legislature. 

Opposing Initiative 26 are the state's chapter of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the American Civil Liberties Union, which are making a procedural case against it--a tactic the state Supreme Court rejected--rather than arguing that it is unconstitutional or in some way runs counter to the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Roe vs. Wade which legalized abortion on demand through the ninth month of pregnancy.

[Read: Pressure Mounts on Defunding Planned Parenthood Over Abortion]

In fact, say supporters like Mason, the language of the initiative could pull the rug out from under Roe. Writing for the majority, Justice Harry Blackmun wrote, "If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case [for decriminalized abortion], of course, collapses, for the fetus's right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment."

The effort is part of a larger, global movement to define when life begins in an effort to undercut the case for legalized abortion. Should the measure in Mississippi succeed then the debate here in the United States would take on a whole new life.

Tags:
abortion

Reader Comments Read all comments (31)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The Natural Abortion Laws explain the scientific fact is that no one can prove at conception that a human life exists. 70 percent of conceptions die shortly after fertilization, another 15 percent of the remaining conceptions die before birth, followed by even more still births and deaths shortly after birth. At conception, most of the time there is death not life. Certainly one can assume that if it is alive and human, there is life at conception. The problem is that we cannot tell at conception which conceptions will live and which will die.

R.C. Crawford of TX 10:06AM April 30, 2012

There is an important natural law involved here. It is impossible to tell if a zygote will become a living human person until all the code that is in the DNA of the zygote has run its full course.

http://www.naturalabortionlaws.com

Russell Crawford of TX 5:46PM October 29, 2011

As a physician I can attest to the fact that life does indeed start at conception. It is irrefutable in science and has nothing to do with theology.Why is it we call a pregnancy a "child" when it is wanted and a "fetus" when it not.

Betty of FL 1:39AM October 29, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement