• Comment (5)

GOP NY-9 Victory Should Have Democrats Worried

September 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Republican Bob Turner's upset win in New York's Ninth Congressional District has some Democrats tearing out their hair.

Turner, who had run for the seat before and lost decisively, won a convincing victory Tuesday, 53 percent to 47 percent, in the special election made necessary by the resignation of scandal-tainted Democrat Anthony Weiner from the U.S. House of Representatives. That Turner's opponent was former New York State Assemblyman Dave Weprin in a district that is roughly 40 percent Jewish should set off alarm bells in Washington—especially in the White House—about the president's prospects for re-election.

[Vote now: Will Obama be a one-term president?]

Turner campaigned on the need for voters to "send a message" to President Obama, something that seemed to resonate well in this very working class, heavily Jewish and ethnic Catholic district which, in a way, is a microcosm of the electoral coalition that has worked well for the Democrats since the days of Al Smith and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. If that coalition is at risk of defecting to the GOP—or even just fracturing into pieces—then the party's troubles are just beginning.

A lot has been said about the so-called "Reagan Democrats" over the years but, now, they are largely Republicans. The defections to Turner from Democratic ranks seen in Tuesday's election came from voter blocs that, while they may have supported Reagan nationally never jumped the fence on state or local races.

[See a photo gallery of Ronald Reagan.]

Democratic National Committee Chairman Debbie Wassermann Schultz's observation that the seat is one of the least Democratic in all of New York City—thus explaining away the loss as coming in a tough district—rings hollow. The district and its antecedents have been held by the Democrats since the early 1920s. Its loss is an embarrassment to the party and to the president.

The race turned on three issues. First, there is the matter of Obama's performance generally. With unemployment still north of 9 percent and the economy lagging, his competence as president is being called into question.

Second, there is the issue of what many voters in the district perceived as his lagging support for Israel, America's staunchest ally in the Middle East. According to one post-election survey, Orthodox Jewish voters, who make up a sizeable portion of NY-9's voting population, voted for Turner—and against Obama—by 8 to 1.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the turmoil in the Middle East.]

Third is Welprin's role in making gay marriage the law of the land in New York State. In a district laden with religious voters—both Orthodox Jews and traditional Catholics—the Democratic candidate's support for socially liberal notions cost him significantly. The issue is still a loser at the polls for those who support it.

Special elections are not necessarily good predictors of the outcome of national contests. The GOP has been on a losing streak over the last few years in specials—a streak it broke Tuesday—but that did not prevent the party from making substantial gains in the 2010 elections, winning back control of the U.S. House of Representatives, a record number of state legislative seats, numerous governorships, and getting close to parity in the U.S. Senate. Nevertheless, if we extrapolate the trends from NY-9 onto the national electorate, it is clear that Barack Obama is in for a tough time of it next year.

Tags:
Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
Anthony Weiner,
2012 presidential election,
Democratic Party,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

ROFF SPINS HALF THE NY9 STORY...

The other half is that the McCain-Perry-Bachmann-Romney type republicans should be just as worried as well.

NY9 showed that wanting something better was thicker than party affiliation.

That will apply INTRA party as well.

As it stands, Ron Paul, 2012. Otherwise, four more years of the six-of-one democrat, half-dozen-the-other republican BS.

The righty shills like Roff need to get it straight in their heads as much as the lefty Bannon-Schlesinger-Milligan shills:

We don't want 'democrat' and we don't want 'republican.' We want something better.

I'd be pleasantly hard-pressed to decide on a presidential contest between Ron Paul (R) and Dennis Kucinich (D), because both of them have their heads straight on THE single most important issue to our economy -- getting out of the global-policing and nation-building business.

And though choosing between them in a hypothetical match-up would be tough, if the one I didn't vote for won, I'd still have something to be happy about.

And what should worry 'republicans' even more is that because Kucinich, a democrat, is right on the big one, though smaller-government and republicanism-leaning I'd entertain what a President Kucinich had to say about a single-payer health-care system, without prejudice, again because he's right on the big one -- and that buys a lot of credibility with me.

I'm hoping that even though Obama set the bar for improvement over him so low that as a group we don't settle for a Perry, Bachmann, or Romney -- and only marginal improvement over Obama.

dom youngross of OH 8:12PM September 15, 2011

Roff . . . you can tell a dem is fearfull, they make-up stories and speak with a loud voice thinking the louder they speak, the truer their made-up story.

BUT, a scared Dem suddenly stops chirping. This phenomenon is observed when crickets suddenly stop chirping when the sun rises. The same thing happens to Dems when they realize incontrovertible truth. They stop chirping. Dems saw Scott Browns election and realized a shellacking at the mid-term election. Turner's election is a referendum of America's disdain of Obama's policies and portends another shellacking of Dems at the ballot box in 2012.

david of ID 6:02PM September 15, 2011

All this win will do is ramp up the namecalling and demonizing from the left . They have nothing to run on , no substance . Track record , ZERO .

Hunter of WI 10:29PM September 14, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement