Don't Base Energy Policy on Faulty Weather Forecasts

May 27, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (34)

Last week, the U.S. government’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration released its annual hurricane forecast for the Atlantic region.

According to NOAA, we can expect anywhere from a “normal” to “above normal” hurricane season. Some people, however, are not impressed.

Count the National Center for Public Policy Research, a free-market think tank that deals with science and environmental issues among them. "NOAA's forecast was on target last year, but it was only the second time in seven years the agency got it right,” said the group’s David Ridenour, which is putting the forecast to the test. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on energy policy.]

"Is NOAA smarter than two fifth graders?” Ridenour asks.“Given its less than 29 percent success rate the past seven years, we sincerely doubt it. To find out for sure, we've commissioned two fifth graders to calculate the number of Atlantic hurricanes using a methodology that fifth graders use to resolve most of life's most vexing challenges."

Filmmakers Steven Crowder and Jordan Crowder have produced a video of the fifth graders, Kate and Chris, demonstrating their methodology. It is intended to remind people that forecasts based on still-evolving science, which is not exactly reliable, shouldn't be used to determine public policy.

"Forecasts are just that: forecasts. All that matters is what actually happens," said Amy Ridenour, NCPPR’s president. "We should keep this in mind as we consider whether to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Past forecasts of rising temperatures, sea levels, and droughts, and other extreme weather events due to rising concentrations of carbon, haven't proven any more reliable that NOAA's annual hurricane forecast. Until their reliability improves, it would be irresponsible to base policy on them."

Tags:
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (34)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The book "What Warming?" by Arno Arrak uses the actual satellite data to prove that the "official" temp trends are fake -- the data has been "Hansen'd" to provide false evidence to try to support the myth of global warming.

FutureUser of TN 1:00PM June 09, 2011

the bigger the lie the longer the Bill Hedges of MO diatribe, regular as clockwork

Jon of CA 3:04PM June 03, 2011

"John Wayne of NM: Complimenting the most consistent liar, wow! idiots teaching idiots are more chatter in the right wing echo chamber - knucklehead conservative nirvana. '

Can you provide us with a list of those supposed "lies"?

Or are you just another spitball shooter?

junior of DC 8:51PM June 02, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement