Boehner's Debt Ceiling Speech Shows Problems of Obama-nomics

May 11, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)

It probably won’t get the attention it deserves, but House Speaker John Boehner Monday delivered an important speech about the country’s economic future.

Speaking to the Economic Club of New York, Boehner laid out his vision for a better, more prosperous America, a vision that conflicts strongly with what President Barack Obama proposes to do.

[Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

The speech will be glossed over because it conflicts with the national narrative that those who are paid to comment on such things are trying to establish in the lead-up to the 2012 election. To them, Obama is the good guy while Boehner wears the black hat. Anyone who looks at the evidence can see, however, that it is the reverse that is true.

The economy remains in shambles. None of the things Obama promised would be the result of his policies have happened. The critics who predicted his economic stimulus would only lengthen the recession and produce a limping recovery were right because Obama’s agenda does not, as Boehner said, give the American people “the freedom to do what they do best.”

“I believe our mission as legislators is to liberate our economy from the things that impede growth,” Boehner said Monday, “to provide clear policies so that innovators and entrepreneurs have the green light to move forward and create jobs without having to worry about second-guessing from Washington.”

Indeed, that’s about all people can do these days: worry about what new tax or job-killing regulation or mandate the White House and its allies in Congress have in store for them. The U.S. House of Representatives, under Boehner’s leadership, is the only check on the excesses of government that have led to the current crisis. [See editorial cartoons on the economy.]

Boehner is right when he says that many of the nation’s problems “can be traced to a misguided belief by politicians that the American economy is something that can be controlled or micromanaged or influenced positively by government intervention and borrowing.”  The recent announcement by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that they remain in the red and are seeking a further government bailout confirms this view. The problem is too much government interference in the marketplace, not the lack of it.

Since becoming president, Obama has presided over a historic increase in the government’s role in two vital sectors of the U.S. economy—healthcare and the Internet—and he is poised to do even more in the area of labor-management relations, food and agriculture, the energy industry, and, through efforts to impose restrictions on carbon emissions in the name of “protecting the environment,” what remains of the nation’s manufacturing base.

“For job creators, the ‘promise’ of a large new initiative coming out of Washington is more like a threat,” Boehner told the group. “It freezes them. Instead of investing in new employees or new equipment, they make the logical decision to stand pat.”

In order to get the American economy back on its feet, policymakers must recognize that its success is the result of “the sum total of the hard work and ingenuity of our people,” as Boehner said, not because a group of so-called experts from Washington and the academy and Wall Street think they can micromanage everything.

With the coming need to increase the federal debt ceiling, all these problems have come to a head. Congress and the White House must figure out a way to bring spending back under control and move forward toward renewed economic growth. Unfortunately, the president and his friends, particularly Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, would rather punt than make hard choices, holding out the specter of a new economic collapse were the debt ceiling not raised. [Read the U.S. News debate: Should Congress raise the debt ceiling?]

“The debt limit debate presents our nation's leaders with the opportunity to reverse these habits and prove that we're starting to get the message. It's a chance to change course and admit that reactionary, short-term Washington solutions aren't always best,” Boehner said. “We have a chance to provide certainty to job creators by signaling that our government is finally set to take a new approach when it comes to the spending and borrowing that has put us so deeply in debt.”

Calling the upcoming vote a “time to end the spending binge and prioritize and modernize what we spend,” Boehner said, “It's true that allowing America to default would be irresponsible. But it would be more irresponsible to raise the debt ceiling without simultaneously taking dramatic steps to reduce spending and reform the budget process.” Moreover, he added, “It would send a signal to investors and entrepreneurs everywhere that America still is not serious about dealing with our spending addiction.”

Boehner, in this one speech, put his cards on the table. “With the exception of tax hikes—which will destroy jobs—everything is on the table. That includes honest conversations about how best to preserve Medicare, because we all know, with millions of baby boomers beginning to retire, the status quo is unsustainable.”

The Republicans have been walking their talk. With the vote to abolish Obamacare, their effort to wring additional savings out of this year’s federal spending, their successful drive to block an increase in the federal income tax, and the Ryan budget, they have shown they are serious about addressing the nation’s economic problems and creating the groundwork for future economic growth. To this, Obama and the Democrats have had just one response: “No.”

The White House expects that Boehner can be maneuvered into a position where he is negotiating with himself while they stand pat and do nothing. It won’t fly. It’s time for the president to either lead by putting his own plan on the table, follow, or just plain get out of the way.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
energy policy and climate change,
Congress,
Republican Party,
John Boehner,
deficit and national debt,
2012 presidential election,
healthcare reform,
unemployment,
Barack Obama,
White House

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What evidence are you looking at? You and Boehner are not working with the facts. The Bush tax cuts and war of false pretense buried us. Thank god he didn't get to privatize social security before the meltdown! President Obama is doing a good job digging us out, and now - ending the wars on terror and Afganistan. Stick to Fox with the disinformation your ludicrous opinions.

Pete Smillie of CA 9:28PM May 15, 2011

Right on Mr. Speaker! Government needs to simply get out of the way. Reagan said it..."Government is the problem". We had a nice 20 year run after his assuming office. G.W. Bush was a disaster, Obama is a disaster on steroids. We need to get back to trusting in freedom and free market capitalism, (not crony capitalism, or socialism) if we are to return to our former greatness and prosperity.

Turner of NY 9:03AM May 15, 2011

Some issues with statements, in quotes:

"The problem is stopping the runaway spending not raising the debt ceiling." Except, when We factor out the extraordinary items of TARP and stimulus funding, We see federal spending, as a percentage of GDP, is in line with historical averages. Meanwhile, total tax collection, as a percentage of GDP, is the lowest it has been in over 60 years. (Source: Historical tables available from the OMB.)

"Live within one's budget. How hard is that to understand? American families need to do that." This is a false analogy: 1 Family does not disrupt the economy of an entire nation when it overspends; 1 Family does not define a currency in which almost all commodities in the world are priced; 1 Family does not provide social services to over 300 million People. The United States government, however, does. Plus, the United States went over a century without any debt ceiling at all; it was created in 1917. So, We do not necessarily even /need/ a debt ceiling for the economy to function correctly.

"We don't borrow more money to dig ourselves further into debt and raise our family debt ceiling." Raising the debt ceiling is not the same as raising the debt; it is merely raising how much can be borrowed in order to pay for what We have already decided We are going to buy. Imagine You have hired an Accountant to pay the bills You have incurred but then said, "Oh, when these bills come due, though, You're not allowed to pay them." Who would want to do business with You? In this example, You represent the Congress, the Accountant represents the Treasury, and the bills represent the legislation already passed stating what money shall be spent on what activities and programs.

The alternative to not raising the debt ceiling by August 2 is to cut federal spending by 40% immediately, which just by itself will reduce GDP 10% to say nothing of the ripple effects. By contrast, the most recent recession had only a 4% decrease in GDP. (Source: BEA data.)

Plus, discretionary spending accounts for only 19% of federal spending and mandatory spending 12%. (Source: IRS data.) Military, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid make up the rest. We cannot, by definition, cut mandatory spending because it's /mandatory/ and even if We cut all discretionary spending, swelling unemployment rolls far beyond what they are now, We still need to cut another 11%. So, the question is, "Do We tell Soldiers They will not get Their paychecks, tell Seniors They have to pay for Their healthcare Themselves at the most medically expensive time of Life, tell Seniors They won't get Their fixed income checks to pay for Their food and/or utilities, or tell the Poor or Disabled They are not worth being taken care of even if Their impoverishment is thru no fault of Their Own?"

The choice is simple, really: raise the limit or choose between killing Americans or turning Soldiers into unpaid Servants. I choose raising the ceiling.

Brian P. Rabbit of PA 3:28PM May 13, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement