Poll: Americans Split on Ryan, Obama Budget Plans

April 28, 2011 RSS Feed Print

The usually insightful and informative Gallup Poll is out with numbers Wednesday that really obfuscate the debate over how best to address the nation’s deficit and indebtedness problem.

On the surface the voters appear split right down the middle, with Gallup reporting that 44 percent of the more than 1,000 U.S. adults surveyed “prefer the Democratic plan proposed by President Barack Obama, while 43 percent say Republican Rep. Paul Ryan's plan is better.”  

This really doesn’t tell us very much.  The poll suggests that, no surprise, self-identified Democrats like Obama’s approach, self-indentified Republicans like Ryan’s and self-identified Independents like them both.  [See editorial cartoons about the budget and deficit.]

The way that Democrats have been attacking the Ryan approach to the budget--which is long on specifics--it’s a wonder that anyone supports it, given their accusations that it portends death or displacement for the poor, the sick, the elderly, the homeless and anyone else who can be considered a reliable left-of-center voter. The Obama approach, which is short on specifics and long on talk, is somewhat more vacuous that Ryan’s--but the truth is that most Americans don’t know very much about either of them.

When asked, as part of the question, Gallup says, “Pluralities of middle-aged Americans as well as those 65 and older prefer Ryan's plan to Obama's, while adults 18 to 29 show more support for Obama's, 53 percent to 30 percent.”  Which does suggest that people more likely to be more informed, like America’s seniors, are siding with Ryan.  But again, that’s just speculation. [Vote now: Should Ryan's budget plan become law?]

It is true that the same survey found that the GOP held “a significant edge” over the Democrats when it came to dealing with the federal budget.  “Nearly half of Americans, 48 percent prefer the Republicans in Congress on this question,” Gallup reported, “while 36 percent favor the Democrats.”  Which probably means that the public’s appetite for unnamed spending cuts is more robust than either its desire to preserve the status quo or seek tax increases, which is part of what Obama wants to do. Nevertheless the same survey blackened the eyes of both parties, who in the public’s mind share in the responsibility for creating the mess the country’s in.

 

Tags:
federal budget,
Gallup,
Paul Ryan,
deficit and national debt,
budget cuts,
Congress,
democratic party,
politics,
republican party,
polls

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I can't begin to say how fed up I am with the lies, threats and blackmail coming from the Office of the President. Our President hasn't followed through on one item from his agenda and yet he is still pushing to spend more. As a country we cannot continue to spend....this is the time for cost cutting.

We are at 34% increase in deficit and if we go on with the current plan will be at 52% by the end of 2012, is this what our our Founding Fathers fought for? I don' think so, they would tell us to tighten our belts and make sacrifices as they did. We cannot continue down this path, our "stimulus plan" did nothing for 95% of America, we are going to kill small businesses through the changes to healthcare and taxation.

We are not hurting large corporations, nor are we hurting the "wealthiest" but we are going to harm those on the cusp and we will cause more people to loose their jobs and cause small business hiring to come to a halt. As large corporations continue to cut jobs we will be seeing losses from both sides and then who will pay taxes? Many of those "wealthy" people are the former employees of high tech firms and financial services companies that have lost their jobs.

The cut, cap and balance was passed by both sides and yet our President said he would no sign it, that is because he wants only his agenda. If our President wants to play hardball, I say let's get to it. If we don't make some hard decisions now our country no longer be the leader of the free world and eventually all but the very rich will live in poverty.

Right now decisions need to be based on facts, not emotion. We must be fiscally responsible and create an environment where logic and common sense prevail over rhetoric or a simple "change" statement.

J Randall of FL 9:34PM July 25, 2011

He is consistently deceitful and lying in his proposals. He moves numbers and time periods around to confuse the issue and make his campaign look good. He gets away with this because about 50% of Americans don't even bother to read the news and get informed. The rest dine on sound bites blasted at them by the liberal and biased lamestream media.

Our conutry is doomed with this jackass as president. Paraphrasing Michelle, I am not proud of my country anly onger since her husband and his pitiful policies have been railroaded through!

Citizen of WI 2:21PM April 29, 2011

So it's Ryan's "Path" versus Obama's "vacuous"? Not so fast, Peter Roff. Your meeting of deadlines is admirable, the way you do so not always.

The one glimmer of hope is that Obama has now made defense spending part of the mix. Ryan certainly didn't, preferring instead to lay waste to domestic programs and areas long on the Republicans' hit list. Defense he gave only a nod to despite the evidence of budget bloating in all of National Security since 9/11. One SuperPower foreign policy decision after another, since WWII as a matter of fact, has forced funding extravagance in all five areas of National Security: National Defense, Homeland Security, Nation Building, Veterans Affairs, and Foreign Aid designed to gain the cooperation of other countries. Obama just might--I wish it were a sure thing--be on the trail of interconnectedness of the five and just might be back to Nobel Peace Prize winner having learned the cost of flexing SuperPower muscle in places like Libya.

Spending in support of projecting power everywhere on earth, something no other country attempts or, apparently, cares to since we've volunteered, is quite an extravagance for a nation deep in debt and professing interest in changing that fact. Just maybe Obama's appointments of a few days ago signal a new direction and with it fiscal sanity in place of foreign-policy-induced national debt and annual deficits. Spending more than the rest of the world COMBINED on National Security, over a trillion dollars a year, seems to me a tempting enough target for spending cuts and long-term downsizing.

"Vacuous," Peter Roff?

Ron W. Smith of UT 1:14PM April 29, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement