Obamacare Repeal Could Hinge on Government Shutdown, Debt Ceiling

March 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

Marking the one-year anniversary of Obamacare becoming law, congressional Republicans are doing their level best to repeal the law.

The first thing they did, after coming into the majority in the U.S. House of Representatives, was to pass H.R. 2, a comprehensive piece of legislation that totally repealed the new healthcare law. Unfortunately for the GOP, the law’s 60-vote requirement in the U.S. Senate means total repeal is unlikely to go anywhere, meaning the legislation is going to have to be dismantled piece by piece.

Even there, however, there is considerable disagreement over what strategies to pursue. Federal Judge Roger Vinson’s finding that the entire law is unconstitutional because of the individual mandate upon which much of it rests means that, for a time at least, the mandate—arguably the singularly most unpopular portion of the legislation—must remain in place. Its removal would render Vinson’s decision moot. [See a slide show of 10 ways the GOP can take down Obamacare.]

House Republican leaders are generally united on the idea that the Obama administration will get no more new money to fund the law’s implementation. There is less unanimity of opinion, however, on the idea that they should take steps to pull back the money the administration has already received thanks to a number of self-funding mechanisms that were included in the original law. According to some estimates, that may be as much as $105 billion.

Getting that money back is not as simple as it may seem, as it all may hinge on the threat of a government shutdown. Efforts to include provisions taking back the money may be offered to the next continuing resolution, as Iowa GOP Rep. Steve King and Minnesota GOP Rep. Michele Bachmann would like to do. But to make such a threat stick, it would first have to win the approval of 60 U.S. senators and, after that, President Barack Obama—who is thought unlikely to want to defund his signature accomplishment, even if it means shutting down the government to defend it.

In a letter to Speaker of the House John Boehner, both King and Bachmann argue that “The success of our effort to shut off funding for ObamaCare will hinge on the leverage points of this first session of the 112th Congress—namely the CR, which expires on March 18th, and the vote on raising the debt ceiling. We recognize the work to defund ObamaCare began with the inclusion of language in H.R. 1 to restrict annual appropriations from being used to implement the law. However, we also recognize that even this language, if enacted, leaves on the table $105.5 billion in automatically appropriated funds for the law's implementation. We cannot successfully defund ObamaCare without shutting off these automatically appropriated funds.” [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on healthcare.]

“If we do not stand our ground on the CR, leverage it as the ‘must pass bill’ that it is, and use it to stop the $105.5 billion in automatically appropriated funds,” the two Republicans said, “ObamaCare will be implemented on our watch. We will also have conceded a significant amount of ground on this issue and will find it difficult, if not impossible, to regain the strategic advantage in future legislative vehicles.”

There are those who have already likened the GOP’s effort to repeal Obamacare as akin to putting the toothpaste back into the tube, something that, once done, is almost impossible to undo. The fallback position may be to slow things down enough to allow the 2014 deadlines within the original legislation to come and go without allowing the administration to make any real progress on creating the bureaucracy necessary to oversee Obamacare—hoping that there will be in place a U.S. Senate and a president who are more open to the idea of reform and repeal than the current crew.

Tags:
Steve King,
Congress,
Republican Party,
John Boehner,
deficit and national debt,
healthcare reform,
Michele Bachmann,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

There will not be an appeal of healthcare reform.

Bring it on, let the GOP slit its own throat by trying to shutdown the govt.

Republicans can go ahead and shut down the government - it will be the final nail in the coffin of the Republican party. These chickenhawks never had the least bit of intention of governing fairly - its all about giving away the treasury to the oligarchs and billionaires buying elections.

Yea, folks finally see the anti-government nut jobs are essentially against the USA in everything they do. These gop wing nuts hate this country, plain and simple. Just a pack of paid lobbyists and corrupt politicians with a koch addiction. Let's not forget the worthless pr punks who never write a word not pre-approved by koch overseers.

This obstructionist terrorism will not stand.

Ron of MI 7:36PM March 17, 2011

Want to know more about this individual mandate everyone is talking about? Healthcare reform droids can help explain key concept. http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=3618

Jeremy Engdahl-Johnson of NY 11:19PM March 16, 2011

The American Polls are trending against Obmacare. The latest Rasmussen polls show 62% FAVOR getting rid of ObummerCare. 51% Strongly Favor Repeal. "Only 33% of voters oppose repeal, with 24% who are Strongly Opposed." Pretty much a two to one ratio. Go to Gallup and look for *their* latest polls about this if you want to Poo Poo Rasmussen (who predicted Obama's win in 2008 and the Trunovers in 2010 better than anyone else combined!) and you will find recent polls where the Plurality of Americans would prefer to see a shutdown of the Federal Government if that is what is needed to get ObummerCare DOA!

So call Bachmann and King's efforts lunacy, but they at least are doing what the American People are asking them to do. I for one, want to give them as much traction as possible!

Clearbrook of CO 12:29PM March 16, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement