Democrats Essentially Accuse GOP of Causing Cancer

March 9, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (19)

No one ever said that politics was a gentleman’s game. However, as The Hill newspaper reports, the Democrats may have reached a new low in their attacks on the GOP’s management of the House’s business.

One of the things the Republicans did upon their return to majority status was to curtail the allegedly environmentally-friendly, energy-conscious programs instituted under the regime of Speaker Nancy Pelosi. This included the replacement of the corn-based, compostable dishes and utensils Pelosi ordered to use in the House cafeterias with good, old-fashioned American Styrofoam. [See a roundup of political cartoons on Democrats.]

The change has been largely popular with House staffers, though a small but vocal minority has complained. Now, a group of Democrats have written House Speaker John Boehner, the paper reported Tuesday, complaining about the change.

In a letter to Boehner and other GOP leaders, the Democrats allege the new cups and other materials now being used in the cafeterias "hold chemical components that could cause cancer," suggesting that "the health of visitors to the Capitol could be compromised." [See which members of Congress got the most money from environment industries.]

Really? With all the problems facing the nation, this small group of Democrats think the leadership should be spending time dealing with an issue as small and as silly as this? It boggles the mind.

Never mind that Pelosi’s supposedly energy-conscious program never produced the kinds of savings that were promised. In an effort to rally the radical environmentalists that help make up the party’s political base, the Democrats who have written to Boehner have taken a position just shy of accusing the Republicans of causing cancer. It’s a low blow that would be laughable were it not for the fact that some folks will take it seriously.

Tags:
House of Representatives,
Congress,
politics,
John Boehner,
Nancy Pelosi,
environment

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"no longer use water mining technics."

What does this mean? Are you talking about mining water? Do you actually mean mountain-top mining? What are technics? I do not understand. I am trying, though. Please advise.

ann keenan of MI 8:47PM May 23, 2011

jheiens of Ohio,

The styrofoam industry; or more specifically, Dow Chemical, gave $498,000 to federal candidates during the 2008 elections. 44% to Democrats and 56% to Republicans. They spent $6,640,000 in 2009 on lobbying efforts. (www.sourcewatch.org)

Let the facts imply what they will without bias, misinformation or intentional omission.

Cole Younger of IL 8:50AM March 12, 2011

No, the Democrats were not accusing the GOP of causing cancer. The alleged cancer causer is primarily Dow Chemical Corp. I don't know how you can use the word allegedly in describing the environmentally friendly and energy conscious measures that were instituted under former speaker Pelosi. These same measures, by the way, were also fiscally more sound than the more recent changes.

The production of styrofoam emits, benzene, styrene,and ethylene. Chemicals that are proven to be hazardous to the workers who are involved in their production. The production emits particles of these chemicals into our natural environment. There are very few re-use recycle options for styrofoam. The stuff sits in landfills for years upon years not breaking down or decomposing organically.Corn based products are made from an easily renewable sustainable source this country has great supply of. Corn. Not petroleum, something in less supply. You didn't mention the GOP's plan to eliminate the installation of CFL light bulbs as well. CFL light bulbs use less mercury in their production meaning less potential mercury being release into our waters and if recycle properly none. CFL bulbs last far longer and use less energy requiring less thereby saving tax payers more money. There is nothing alleged about this. What is trivial about this debate is that it has become a partisan issue. All national leaders should be working towards a better economic and environmental future for the country as a whole. Not pointing fingers and bickering to save their own personal comforts.

Cole Younger of IL 4:23PM March 11, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement