Wisconsin Senate Democrats Offer a Profile in Cowardice

February 24, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (22)

There should be a committee whose job it is to hand out awards recognizing political courage and cowardice in the face of difficult times. If one did exist, it would no doubt award the 2011 “Yellow Feather” to the Democrats in the Wisconsin state senate who, confronted with legislation that would damage the political power of their principal special interest patrons, promptly decamped to Illinois and brought the legislative process to a halt.

This is not, by any stretch of the imagination, democracy’s finest moment.

To review, Wisconsin, which has a reputation for being one of the most progressive of the 50 states, took a sharp turn to the right in the last election, voting in Republican Scott Walker as governor, ousting longtime liberal Sen. Russ Feingold in favor of a conservative Republican with no previous electoral experience and giving the GOP control of both houses of the state legislature.

It was, to put it simply, a Republican rout.

Walker is now trying to govern as he promised he would, which means--among other things--taking on the public employee unions whose work rules and generous salary and benefits not only impede reform all across the Badger State but which, over time, threaten to bankrupt it. He has also proposed scaling back considerably the collective bargaining rules for these same unions, something that is a real threat to their power and to their hold on the permanent unelected state government. [Take the U.S. News poll: Is Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker right about the unions?]

The unions, off course, cannot allow Walker to succeed. For them it is a survival battle. They have even agreed to accept the financial concessions on which he insists as long as the governor agrees to drop his demand to change the terms of the state’s collective bargaining laws as they apply to public employee unions

[See photos of the protests in Madison, Wisconsin.]

What they are really trying to protect, however, is their political influence. No one less than Franklin Delano Roosevelt warned against--and was unalterably opposed to--public sector unions, calling the idea “unthinkable and intolerable.” He feared, as did others the rise of a powerful political machine, not just subsidized but paid for outright by the taxpayers, capable of withholding vital public services from those who paid for them unless and until their demands were met.

From garbage strikes to “the blue flu” to the current goings on in Madison--where thousands of public school teachers are calling in “sick” so they can help occupy the state capital building, the public employee unions have shown again and again their willingness to flex their muscles in order to get their way. Up to now, the taxpayers have been insulated to some degree from the costs of that muscle. Moreover, the current set up insulates many of these same public employees--especially teachers and regulatory bureaucrats--from being held accountable for their performance on the job. [Take the U.S. News poll: Are Wisconsin teachers unfair to skip school for protests?]

The taxpayers are insulated no longer. What they have is a bad deal all around. They foot the bills. It is an arrangement that is crying out for reform--as Walker and a handful of other GOP governors have proposed to do. Unfortunately, because the public employee unions “own” the Democrats in Wisconsin and in so many other states, the cause of reform is being blocked by the senators’ exodus to Illinois. They know they can keep Walker’s plan in limbo as long as they fail to appear, the requirement for a quorum being higher on budget matters than they are for regular senate business.

The Senate Democrats’ decision to flee the state is childish, reminiscent of the kid in grammar school who owned the football and insisted that everyone play by his rules or he’d take his ball and go home. It is also an insult to the people of Wisconsin who voted in the current leadership last November, knowing full well what they intended to do. Wisconsin Democrats have put the demands of a well-funded, politically-influential special interest group--the public employee union bosses--ahead of the state’s general welfare and regular political order. Rather than stand and fight, they’ve run. Folks will remember in some future November.

And if anyone wants to send a “yellow feather” award of their own, the address is: State Capitol, 2 East Main Street, Madison, WI 53702.

Tags:
Wisconsin,
Democratic Party,
2010 Congressional elections,
unions,
Congress,
Republican Party,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I don't disagree with the fact that unions get their members great benefits, but the way that Gov. Walker went about getting the bill passed and the timeline (he was in office less than 2 months) was a bit of a slap in the face to public sector employees. "Hey, thanks for your support, now I'm going to cut your income and make you pay 2-4x what you've been paying for your benefits". What the Tea Party is doing is underminding the middle class- the very people who economist say are the answer to the economic crisis. Without the middle class, we would be left with the very rich and the very poor...who will fix our economic disaster then?

Walker's history should have been a warning to those who voted for him and are now regretting it. He lost his own district in the election. Milwaukee Cty had to pay THOUSANDS to bailiffs after he unilaterally decided to fire them all and replace them with a private security company (which was owned/operated by a felon).

Democrats need the financial support of unions because they are not sitting in the pockets of millionaires with political interests. The Koch Brothers stand to make millions more because Walker's bill included a no-bid sale of public utilities. Democrats don't have the PAC money that Repubicans do, so they need whatever support they can get.

BTW- Walker was willing to say that the unions for the State Troopers and other protective services would be exempt from the collective bargaining changes because they supported his campaign.

Mary J. Badger of WI 3:26AM July 13, 2011

Walker is legally within his rights to hold Recall elections for all of the democrats based on dereliction of duty-If it was Republicans that split town I guarantee they would be facing recall elections-absolutely no doubt in my mind. Lets hold Recall Elections now and see how they fare.

TomW of WA 6:03PM March 01, 2011

Dodging a quorum isn't a new tactic. It's cheap, but within the rules, and both parties do it. I don't know how often it's done in other states, but I'm familiar with the tactic in Texas:

In 1979, Democrats in Texas refused to show up over a bill to change the state's primary date - "The Killer Bees". I couldn't verify if they left the state, but I don't think so. The state troopers were fairly incompetent in tracking them down, though they did accidentally arrest one legislator's brother and forcibly took him to Austin. Poor guy.

In 1993, Republicans did the same (a one-day event to protest a bill over how judges are elected) - they were called (cleverly) "The Killer W.A.S.P.s". They did not leave the state; merely evaded state troopers. I worked in the legislature for that one; it was viewed as a pretty darn funny event. I know one legislator at least was playing golf that day.

In 2004, Democrats again denied a quorum over a redistricting bill, and they did actually leave the state (hiding out in Oklahoma) - "The Killer D's"

For those keeping count, that's about once per decade over the last 30 years.

Leaving the state is cowardly, in my view, but smart. There's nothing the GOP can do, short of kidnapping the Democratic senators and transporting them back across state lines. Which would be just slightly illegal.

Of course, the Republicans could (and should) take care of all sorts of business that only requires a simple majority, and not allow the Democrats any input whatsoever, unless they return. That, too, is cheap - but within the rules.

Rich of CO 5:50PM February 28, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement