Gov. Rick Scott's Florida Budget a Tea Party Dream

February 9, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (15)

In an election full of surprises, one of the biggest was the election of businessman Rick Scott as governor of Florida.

Coming out of nowhere, Scott—who had previously been active in the fight against nationalized healthcare—bested two statewide elected officials on his way to winning the top office in the nation’s third largest state. What is even more surprising is that Scott, having promised to govern as a consistent conservative, appears to be doing just that on the basis of his just-introduced 2011 budget.

The state’s current budget, enacted under Republican-turned-independent Charlie Crist, puts total spending for the year at $70.4 billion dollars. Scott has proposed cutting that, turning a budget that spends $65.9 billion in 2011 and $63.3 billion in 2012—a sizeable cut by most any standards. He also proposes to cut taxes by $4 billion over two years, which is also a considerable amount, considering Florida is one of the few states left without a state income tax. Included in those cuts is a plan to reduce the business tax from 5.5 percent to 3 percent as a first step toward completely phasing it out by 2018, and a $1.4 billion cut in property taxes over two years. [See the 10 best cities to find a job.]

Part of the savings will be achieved through the elimination of failing economic development programs and a plan to “carefully” expand other programs based on “measurable goals”—something of a twist on the conventional approach to government problem solving, which usually measures the seriousness of a commitment by the amount of money spent rather on the results achieved.

Like other governors, Scott is also promising to take on the issue of public pensions before it becomes a crisis, saving taxpayers $2.8 billion over two years through modernization of the state’s pension system and a new requirement that state employees fund a portion of their retirement—Florida currently is the only state where taxpayers are on the hook for 100 percent of the costs of the state’s public pensions. [Read stories about the deficit and national debt.]

Scott’s budget, which is likely to pass through the GOP-controlled legislature without too much difficulty, also presumes $660 million in savings through the renegotiation of contracts and leases—using state purchasing power as leverage—and $270 million in savings over two years through the consolidation of duplicative functions, reorganization, privatization, and the elimination of programs that are not part “of government’s core mission.”

All together, Scott has proposed an ambitious plan that puts the taxpayers’ interests ahead of the special interests, especially those within state government itself. It’s the kind of budget that the Tea Party Nation can get excited about—making it a model for what other reform-minded governors may want to do in their states. It’s clear that Scott not only got the message about what voters wanted in 2010, he’s acting on it. The mandate they gave was not to better manage the welfare state; it was to winnow it down. [See the Year in Photos: 2010.]

If he’s successful, it almost assuredly gets him on the short list for vice president in 2012 or, depending on the outcome of that election, for president in 2016.

Tags:
Tea Party,
Florida,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
2012 presidential election,
healthcare reform,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

That's the great thing about the USA. If you don't like Florida, Go back to Maryland.

Pete of FL 8:32AM November 08, 2011

I truly wish that the House speaker will stop saying health reform is unpopular, as it not. The majority of the people like it or wish for even a stronger bill. When will the American people stop letting the Republicans define the narrative? It appears that the Republicans are saying two sides of the story, super in favor of it, until Obama intervenes, and once he intervenes they don't want it. They are a funny group.

Laurie of FL 10:10PM March 23, 2011

What a crock of hubris!

K.D. Heinly of FL 5:02PM March 13, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement