Remember That the Arizona Shootings Are the Exception in America

January 12, 2011 RSS Feed Print

It comes as little surprise that, in the aftermath of the horrific shooting in Tucson, Arizona that killed a half dozen people and wounded more than twice that number--including a member of the U.S. House of Representatives--that the left and the right are both trying to establish a claim to the moral high ground.

The left is blaming the limited- and anti-government rhetoric expressed by the Tea Party movement and by the Republicans for creating an environment in which shooting pubic officials has somehow become fair game. The right is responding with charges of its own, pointing out where liberals and Democrats have urged or fantasized in public about meritorious acts of violence against, among others, former President George W. Bush, newly-inaugurated Florida Gov. Rick Scott and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

Neither side is completely right or completely wrong--even though, based on what we now known about the alleged shooter--the Tucson massacre was an act of madness rather than a political protest. The American political system, with its constitutional guarantees of free speech and free of thought, is notoriously vigorous and has been so throughout history. [Photo Gallery: Gabrielle Giffords Shooting in Arizona.]

Where both sides are mistaken is in the idea that the current level of rhetoric somehow represents a nadir for the nation. Those who choose to comment on it would do well to study U.S. history before opening their mouths or putting pen to paper. There are plenty of examples--the attacks the Jeffersonian Democrats made against John Adams and the Federalists, the Jacksonians’ assault on the character of John Quincy Adams, and the vehemence with which Lincoln was assailed by those opposed to his presidency even in the North--that make the arguments of the current era look like a high school debate.

What few if any of the commentators who are now weighing in on the Tucson massacre have failed to mention is that, in a nation of more than 300 million people, acts of politically-motivated violence are surprisingly rare. Remember that, through out the world there are places where car bombings, shooting, abductions, assassinations, riots and the unlawful arrest and detention of members of “the political opposition” are not rare but are, in fact, commonplace.

In the United States the Founding Fathers gave us a system of government that allows for the peaceful redress of grievances, most often through the use of the ballot box. In the days and weeks ahead, as the back-and-forth over the tragedy in Tucson continues to escalate, we would all do well to remember just how lucky we are to live in a country where political debates and the transfer of power, no matter how heated the rhetoric surrounding them may become, occur peacefully rather than violently.

Tags:
Abraham Lincoln,
John Quincy Adams,
Congress,
democratic party,
politics,
gun control and gun rights,
Gabrielle Giffords,
republican party,
Tea Party,
Andrew Jackson

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

. Algunos detalles realmente interesantes que ha escrito el # nombre me ayudó mucho, justo lo que estaba buscando: D.

testosterona of AL 12:54PM December 09, 2011

Peter, sorry you have him as your head cheerleader.

Hombre of AR 12:10AM January 17, 2011

Where to start?

You try to draw a moral equivalence between the Left blaming the attack on Right-wing rhetoric, and the Right defending itself by pointing out that the Left has also used such rhetoric? The missing part, of course, is that the Right NEVER blamed the shootings on Leftist rhetoric.

So no, IT IS NOT TRUE that both sides have equal claim to the moral high ground. The Right has consistently claimed that political rhetoric HAD NOTHING TO DO with the shootings, and as it turns out, they were right. I notice you left out that little detail.

BOTH sides claiming this is a nadir for political speech? Again, you are completely wrong. I don't know if the Left has claimed such a thing (it sounds like a claim they might make) but the Right certainly has NEVER claimed that. We on the Right already know that such rhetoric was routine in our nation's history.

Face it Peter: the Left jumped the gun (literally) blaming the Right for the shooting when they had absolutely ZERO evidence of a connection. All the Right did was defend itself. The crazed actions of this nut were not connected to any rhetoric by the Right. The Left was wrong and you darn well know it.

Trying to make both sides equally wrong in this sordid affair is just another example of media bias, not wanting to admit the truth.

Fred Goodwin of TX 4:30PM January 15, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement