Clinton Vets Like Daley Show Dems See Obama as Empty Suit

January 7, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

The meaning behind the utterly surreal episode in the White House press room several weeks ago in which former President Bill Clinton dazzled the assembled reporters while Barack Obama left for a Christmas party is now clear. It was a deviously subtle way to announce the Obama administration was coming to an end, to be replaced by the third Clinton administration.

The Obamalogues that populated the White House staff are largely gone, at least from senior positions. Left wing stalwarts Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, and most lately Press Secretary Robert Gibbs have been banished to Chicago. Larry Summers and the rest of the economic first team--save for Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner--are off to Wall Street or academia or back into retirement. Their replacements, at least those that have been announced, are solid centrists and veterans of the Clinton administration, the latest picks being former Clinton Commerce Secretary Bill Daley as White House chief of staff and Clinton White House veteran Gene Sperling, who is once again headed to the National Economic Council. [See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

Make no mistake about it. The White House, which has been seemingly adrift for the last two years, and which, frankly, blew the mandate it had been handed in the 2008 elections, is once again in the hands of adults. The shellacking the Democrats took in the 2010 elections, the blame for which falls squarely at the president's feet, is only part of the reason for the move. Party elders have obviously realized that, for all his promise, President Obama is largely an “empty suit,” who, like Jimmy Carter in 1980, threatens to take all of them down for a generation or more.

It is not simply a matter of the White House needing to move away from the left and back towards the center; it's that, despite all that Obama's election augured, the party has almost nothing upon which to base a successful re-election effort two years hence. Unemployment remains well above 9 percent, the economy is still in the doldrums, federal spending is out of control, and the all-too-critical bloc of independent voters--who by voting overwhelmingly for the Democrats in 2006 and 2008, nearly rendered the Republicans irrelevant--have gone over to the other side in huge numbers. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on Obama.]

With these new appointments, Obama appears to be falling back on a “whatever works” strategy, which requires him to recycle key elements of the post-1994 Clinton administration who know how to get things done. It matters little what they accomplish--they simply must have something encouraging to tell the voters and some record of success to which they can point come the next election. Otherwise, they are doomed--and you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that.

Tags:
David Axelrod,
Democratic Party,
Rahm Emanuel,
Robert Gibbs,
Larry Summers,
2010 Congressional elections,
William Daley,
Tim Geithner,
Congress,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
Bill Clinton,
2012 presidential election,
unemployment,
Barack Obama,
politics,
White House

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Mr. Roff:

As a journalist, you are well aware that we form our opinions based on facts (truthful information--should your definition of "facts" be different than mine). Could you, therefore, direct me to the primary documents you gathered for this article about Clinton's opinions of President Obama?

You are not going to use the Fox defense are you? You know, the defense News Corporation ALWAYS uses when forced, in court, to defend their "tall tales"?

...when News Corporation points out that many of their broadcasts, particularly, "news" broadcasts, are included in the term: "...a Public Forum," and gracefully remind the plaintiff that News Corporation, as a "Public Forum," is not required to tell the truth...and News Corporation, then, wins! You would not stoop to use that defense would you? Could you verify that you practice "journalistic ethics?

I would love to be wrong about this, and find that you do, indeed, have truthful and primary documents, on which you based your article.

anna banana of MI 11:15PM January 15, 2011

Great credentials but all this author boils down to is another talking head for Fox. So tell me, oh wise one, was the 8 years prior to President Obama ran by adults, children or a mixture of both in the neat little world of nepotism. You are awfully mean-spirited. He is not an empty suit! As far as I'm concerned, he is of high moral fiber and truly cares about the people. Even you!

Elizabeth of MD 12:03PM January 12, 2011

Americans showed their appreciation for barry and Democrat Congress Nov.2.

Those "Republican rats" kicked out a whole lot of Democrats in Congress and across this great Nation. Looks like you are mistaken as far as the voters are concerned. Reason why liberals are 20 % and free falling without a chute...

Bill Hedges of MO 2:04AM January 09, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement