Democrat Abuses Spurred GOP Filibusters

January 4, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

A new Congress means new rules.

Over in the House the new GOP majority has committed to post its rules package online so that every interested American can see it and, hopefully, better understand how the chamber will operate over the next two years. Things in the Senate, however, are not as clear.

Right now the Republicans--who start the year in better position than they were two years ago--are marshaling forces to beat back an effort to terminate the filibuster, an institutional safeguard that protects the rights of the minority while oft times frustrating the ability of the majority to get its way.

The filibuster, which both sides have used to their advantage over the years, was a particular thorn in the side of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid during the last session of Congress--despite the fact that the Democrats at times enjoyed a filibuster-proof majority. The arguments some Democrats are making in support of its abolition, however, ignore some significant facts.

The rules of the Senate are written in such a way as to protect the rights of the minority--one of the few remaining vestiges of the idea that senators were the representatives of their states as political entities rather than the people of their states. Under Reid’s leadership, the Republicans say, the right to debate and the right to amend proposed legislation--two of the Senate’s most important functions--have been curtailed by the majority.

[See a slide show of new faces in the Senate.]

“The Majority Leader is always the first to be recognized on the Senate floor, and he can use that power to offer a series of Democrat amendments to pending legislation in a manner that prevents Republicans from offering any of their ideas,” the Senate Republican Policy Committee said in analysis released Monday. Reid has used this tactic, which is know in Capitol Hill parlance as “filling the tree” “a record 44 times.” In fact, he has filled the tree “three times more often than the previous majority leader, and more than the past six majority leaders combined.” The GOP is also critical of Reid who, it says, “has made a habit of shutting down debate before it even starts.”

“In the Senate, the majority can force an end to debate on any matter by a procedure known as cloture. Majority Leader Reid has indicated his lack of interest in deliberation by moving to shut down debate the very day measures are first considered on the Senate floor. According to CRS (the Congressional Research Service), the majority has done this nearly three times more, on average, than the previous six majorities. In fact, the current majority in its two Congresses in power has moved to end debate on measures a total of 29 times prior to any amendments even being voted on. The previous majority did this less than half as often--only 12 times in the preceding two Congresses,” the RPC says.

[See a roundup of political cartoons on Democrats.]

Reid’s effort to exclude the minority from the legislative process, Senate Republicans say, is the primary reason the filibuster has been used so frequently over the last two years. Right now the two sides are at loggerheads, with the Democrats threatening to change the rules on a party-line vote, throwing aside decades of Senate traditions in the pursuit of political power. If the voters tried to send a message in the last election that they wanted more debate and more b-partisan solutions it is so far, as far as the Senate majority is concerned, falling on deaf ears.

 

Tags:
Democratic Party,
2010 Congressional elections,
Senate,
Congress,
Republican Party,
Harry Reid,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Yes, I honestly believe that many who are conservative is either un-American or stupid or both, as so frequently demonstrated by the so many f'n idiotic conservative responses here.

Reid is correct in streamlining the process in the Senate, especially so the Senate can more quickly flush the toilet with all the crude coming the new GOP House punks, who have a clear reactionary agenda that will hurt the American people and the American economy if any of it actually could get enacted.

Cheryl of OH 9:50PM January 06, 2011

It's one thing to disagree with each other. But do you honestly believe that everyone who is conservative is either un-American or stupid? No, I truly don't believe that you do. However, that would be hard to prove by your comments. But then, I always try to think the best of people.

I could easily argue the merits of the article, but why should anyone bother trying to have a decent conversation with someone who is always calling them names. That's how a ten-year-old behaves, not a mature adult.

KenBob of SC 11:27PM January 05, 2011

Senator barry was against raising debt ceiling in 2006.

Now with debt ceiling 65 % higher he is for raising.

In last 6 months another $$$ trillion debt.

We needed the filibusters to slow/stop Democrats. They had the super majority for long time. Democrats controlled both Houses under Bush and barry.

Bill Hedges of MO 10:40PM January 05, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement