New Census Data Hurts Obama in 2012

December 21, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Things aren’t looking so good for President Barack Obama.

The tax deal he cut with congressional Republicans has created chaos on his left. His other victories--the stimulus package, the new healthcare law and the repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell" policies--are discordant rather than inclusive, meaning that just as many Americans if not more oppose them than embrace them. And, as pollster Scott Rasmussen reported Friday, “For the first time since he became president, only 35 percent of voters say Barack Obama thinks society is fair and decent.” Obama is a divisive political figure--not at all the post-partisan unifier he promised he would be when running for president in 2008. All of which spells trouble with a capital “T” as far as his re-election hopes are concerned. [See a roundup of editorial cartoons about 'don't ask, don't tell.]

Added on to that is the mathematics of reapportionment. Every 10 years the census count is used to determine just how many seats each state will have in the U.S. House of Representatives, which in turn affects the numbers of votes each state has in the Electoral College that determines who the next president will be. According to figures released Tuesday, the projected shift in seats will make it just that much harder for Obama to win reelection in 2012.

[See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

The pattern over the last several decades has seen states in the Northeast and industrial Midwest losing seats to the South and Southwest--a movement of from states that are generally, evenly reliably, Democrat at the presidential level to states Republicans routinely win. That pattern, according to the latest estimates, continues this year.

Democratic New York and toss up Ohio are expected to lose two seats each while reliably Republican Texas is expected to gain as many as four. GOP-leaning Florida and Arizona will each gain one, possibly two seats. Presidentially Republican Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah, and Democratic Washington will probably each gain a single seat while Democratic Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Republican Louisiana may each lose one. [Read more about the 2012 presidential election.]

All told, it’s a significant shift in seats from Democratic territory to places that are Republican strongholds, which will not only produce a GOP-run House of Representatives for the next decade but will also make it tougher for Obama to win a majority of votes in the Electoral College--especially if he continues to move to the left in his battles with Congress.

Tags:
census,
healthcare reform,
Congress,
democratic party,
politics,
2012 presidential election,
Census Bureau,
national security terrorism and the military,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Do you attend a sister, "Leftist University of Maryland" down there in Florida?

http://snooperreport.com/internet-videos/2010/12/20/leftist-university-of-maryland-fox-viewers-most-misinformed.html

...or not unlike most liberal pokey heads, do you get your information from yet another liberal pokey head and call it Gospel???

Thetruthwillsetyoufree of MD 9:20AM December 23, 2010

In fact, under new health care reform your health insurance company will no longer be allowed to cancel your policy if you get sick, we should be doing this already! search online "Wise Health Insurance" it is a good place to find insurance if you have illness like me.

andrewthoone of CA 2:45AM December 22, 2010

September 22, 2008

“Bush Called For Reform of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac 17 Times in 2008 Alone Only To Have Dems Ignored His Warnings”

http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2008/09/bush_called_for.php

Leslie E. jt sounds logical to you that if you raise taxes on rich government revenue increases.

Is true if you raise taxes on the non producers, the lower tax rates.

Rich pay MORE tax with decreased tax rates. I‘LL PROVE IT. Why don‘t you prove you‘re right or me wrong with evidence ?.:

“Millionaires Go Missing”

“Maryland's fleeced taxpayers fight back”

“Maryland couldn't balance its budget last year, so the state tried to close the shortfall by fleecing the wealthy. Politicians in Annapolis created a millionaire tax bracket, raising the top marginal income-tax rate to 6.25%. And because cities such as Baltimore and Bethesda also impose income taxes, the state-local tax rate can go as high as 9.45%. Governor Martin O'Malley, a dedicated class warrior, declared that these richest 0.3% of filers were "willing and able to pay their fair share." The Baltimore Sun predicted the rich would "grin and bear it."

“One year later, nobody's grinning. One-third of the millionaires have disappeared from Maryland tax rolls. In 2008 roughly 3,000 million-dollar income tax returns were filed by the end of April. This year there were 2,000, which the state comptroller's office concedes is a "substantial decline." On those missing returns, the government collects 6.25% of nothing. Instead of the state coffers gaining the extra $106 million the politicians predicted, millionaires paid $100 million less in taxes than they did last year -- even at higher rates.

No doubt”

http://www.taxcutsincreaserevenue.com/Go-To-9823-0314-8302/Tax%20Increases%20Cut%20Revenue.htm

“The Soak-the-Rich Catch-22”

“Since 1978, the U.S. has cut the highest marginal earned-income tax rate to 35% from 50%, the highest capital gains tax rate to 15% from about 50%, and the highest dividend tax rate to 15% from 70%. President Clinton cut the highest marginal tax rate on long-term capital gains from the sale of owner-occupied homes to 0% for almost all home owners. We’ve also cut just about every other income tax rate as well.”

“During this era of ubiquitous tax cuts, income tax receipts from the top 1% of income earners rose to 3.3% of GDP in 2007 (the latest year for which we have data) from 1.5% of GDP in 1978. Income tax receipts from the bottom 95% of income earners fell to 3.2% of GDP from 5.4% of GDP over the same time period. (See the nearby chart).”

http://cliftonchadwick.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/the-soak-the-rich-catch-22/

You call $259,000 the rich. Those who make that and more are the ones who produce J O B S for people like you. They take the risk of business and must pay their help no matter if the business succeeds or fail. They invest their money and time. With no guarantees.

The best become Bill Gates…

Bill Hedges of MO 12:43AM December 22, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement