Game of Chicken on Bush Tax Cuts Holds Economy Hostage

December 3, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (34)

Just hours after the still Nancy Pelosi-run U.S. House of Representatives voted to extend the current tax rates for middle- and lower-income Americans--rather than keeping all the tax rates where they are on everyone as the Republicans want--negotiations to bring up similar measures in the U.S. Senate collapsed.

Senate leaders, according to various published reports, had been working on a plan to offer four different approaches, one that mirrored what the House passed, one that extended the current tax rates for anyone making less than $1 million per year, one that would extend the current tax rates for everyone for five years and one that would make the current tax rates permanent.

What will happen next is anyone’s guess. Harry Reid, the leader of the Senate Democrats, is expected to push for a vote on the House-passed measure as early as today but it is not at all clear there are enough votes in favor of the measure to allow it to come to the floor.

[See our editorial cartoons on the economy.]

Almost everyone agrees that raising taxes in an economy as weak as the U.S. economy is now is foolhardy. And there is plenty of evidence that lower tax rates, up to a point, on the highest incomes provides the biggest bang for the buck as far as stimulating the economy goes. So we’re in a position where party politics and good economic policy are at loggerheads, with the Democrats continuing to adhere to the class warfare argument that the rich are somehow less deserving of lower tax rates than the rest of the country. 

In essence, the U.S. economy is being held hostage to a political game of chicken. The White House is still trying to work out a compromise with congressional leaders to craft a measure acceptable to everyone, which would mean preserving the current structure as it is for some period of time, but the general perception is that it is following rather than leading the discussion. There is still time to work a deal out and pass something that will allow all sides to claim victory. One idea is to link yet another extension of unemployment benefits to a package that extends the current tax rates on everyone for everything, but the economic uncertainty the ticking clock is producing is likely to drive the economy way down as the year comes to an end.

 

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Congress,
taxes,
Republican Party,
Nancy Pelosi,
Harry Reid,
unemployment,
politics,
federal taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (34)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"...the Bush tax cuts actually shifted the total tax burden farther toward the rich..."

That is because the rich made THAT much more money than regular working stiffs. Look at this article titled "Top 1 Percent of Americans Reaped Two-Thirds of Income Gains in Last Economic Expansion

Income Concentration in 2007 Was at Highest Level Since 1928, New Analysis Shows": http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=2908

If you look at historical rates, you'll see that we are near the lowest ever:

http://www.truthandpolitics.org/top-rates.php

In this time of deficit talk, ain't it funny how the compromise calls for more spending and less taxes.

Watts of NC 11:06AM December 07, 2010

ok low taxes gives the people the power. right now we work for the goverment not the other way around. Are politicians make more money than the average american. They spend money like mad and expect us to foot the bill. Are goverment only survives off of leaching from the private sector.

High taxes also make america un competitve. High taxes drive bussiness out. If you doubt that look at new york.

bob of NY 9:28AM December 06, 2010

“The greatest average growth America ever experienced was when tax rates were much higher than they are today.”

W R O N G…

Reducing high taxes gave us longest BULL MARKET. That would be John F. Kennedt, Ronald Reagan, and G.W. Bush:

“The tax cuts of the 1920s”

“Tax rates were slashed dramatically during the 1920s, dropping from over 70 percent to less than 25 percent. What happened? Personal income tax revenues increased substantially during the 1920s, despite the reduction in rates. Revenues rose from $719 million in 1921 to $1164 million in 1928, an increase of more than 61 percent.”

“The Kennedy tax cuts”

“President Hoover dramatically increased tax rates in the 1930s and President Roosevelt compounded the damage by pushing marginal tax rates to more than 90 percent. Recognizing that high tax rates were hindering the economy, President Kennedy proposed across-the-board tax rate reductions that reduced the top tax rate from more than 90 percent down to 70 percent. What happened? Tax revenues climbed from $94 billion in 1961 to $153 billion in 1968, an increase of 62 percent (33 percent after adjusting for inflation).”

“The Reagan tax cuts”

“Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation).”

“Harmful Spending & Complexity”

“Lower tax rates are important, but they are not the only critical issue. Both the level of government spending and where that money goes are very important. And even when looking only at tax policy, tax rates are just one piece of the puzzle. If certain types of income are subject to multiple layers of tax, as occurs in the current system, that problem cannot be solved by low rates. Similarly, a tax system with needless levels of complexity will impose heavy costs on the productive sector of the economy.”

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2003/08/the-historical-lessons-of-lower-tax-rates

Bill Hedges of MO 11:09PM December 05, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement