Senate Republicans Hold Firm Against Obama Tax Hikes

December 1, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

The split control of Congress produced by the November 2010 elections left some conservatives concerned that Republican senators would be less likely to stand firm on key issues than their counterparts in the incoming majority GOP House of Representatives.

Part of this is process driven. Individual senators have much more power, especially on the Senate floor, than individual House members. That, coupled with the fact that the Senate is allegedly more collegial than the House, sometimes leads to oddly bipartisan coalitions that push issues that might better be left to the political back burners.

Right now, the major issues before Congress are providing the money needed to keep the government running and whether or not to extend any or all of the current tax rates, something that many Democrats are loath to do.

In a letter sent Wednesday to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, the entire Senate GOP conference—which now numbers 42 members, one more than is needed to sustain a filibuster—indicate they would oppose doing any Senate business until these two critical issues are addressed. 

“The nation’s unemployment level, stuck near 10 percent, is unacceptable to Americans,” the letter begins. “Senate Republicans have been urging Congress to make private-sector job creation a priority all year.  President Obama in his first speech after the November election said ‘we owe’ it to the American people to ‘focus on those issues that affect their jobs.’  He went on to say that Americans ‘want jobs to come back faster.’ Our constituents have repeatedly asked us to focus on creating an environment for private-sector job growth; it is time that our constituents’ priorities become the Senate’s priorities.”

“For that reason,” they say, they will “not agree to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to any legislative item until the Senate has acted to fund the government and we have prevented the tax increase that is currently awaiting all American taxpayers.”

Politically what that means is the Senate GOP is holding firm against the Obama tax hikes by threatening to shut down all the Senate’s business until this issue, along with the need to keep the government running is taken care of. [See a slide show of the GOP's rising stars.]

The news was not well received by Reid who, on the Senate floor, called the letter an example of the GOP unwillingness to work “on critical matters, then blaming the Democrats for not addressing the need of the American people.”

In reality it means that the more moderate GOP Senate Conference heard the same message from the American electorate that the incoming House majority believes it sent. The message from that election is that the problems in Washington are too much spending and too much job-killing regulation not under taxation. Inside the beltway, that’s what’s called “a game changer.”

Tags:
Democratic Party,
2010 Congressional elections,
Congress,
taxes,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
unemployment,
federal taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Vikki and John, et. al.,

Although I agree with some of your sentiments, some of your facts are not correct. The GOP has stated plainly from the beginning that they want to extend unemployment benefits to the '99ers", but they want the money to come from the stimulus funds that are still waiting to be applied somewhere, instead of borrowing more funds and adding even more to the deficit. When a person has heavy credit debt they don't need ANOTHER line of credit--they need to learn how to budget wisely and stop living off credit alone.

The 'obstructionists' as you called them, have only said "the entire Senate GOP conference...indicate they would oppose doing any Senate business until these two critical issues are addressed." The critical issues are "providing the money needed to keep the government running and whether or not to extend any or all of the current tax rates."

Now, I understand the enmity people feel with those making more than $250,000 a year. I might make that in nine or ten years. And I agree with John's assessment of all the jobs going overseas. Reminds me of Ross Perot talking about the "giant sucking sound" of all our jobs leaving the country.

However, though I'm not a business expert, it seems to me that a temporary agreement to let the rich keep their 3% isn't going to make much of a dent in things. And the Republicans HAVE offered a temporary agreement.

It seems more like class warfare to me. And Tree Hugger wants all of us to pay more taxes anyway. Why? And why is it so hard to let unemployment benefits come from the stimulus package? It seems to me that the Democrats are more obstructionists than the Republicans.

KenBob of SC 11:58AM December 02, 2010

John Stutsman of NM really tells it like it is. Congratulations.

Now if we can only get a few million other people shouting the same message we would really get something done in spite of the Republican stonewall.

JC of RI 10:49AM December 02, 2010

You said it Vikki. There is no tax hike, it is simply letting the Bush/Cheney tax cuts which should have never been implemented in the first place expire.

Republicans are out to destroy this country and people like Bill Hedges of MO are helping to push us off the cliff like a bunch of lemmings.

Tree Hugger of CO 10:27AM December 02, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement