How Republicans Can Repeal Health Reform

Reader Comments

Back to blog

When barry was running for office did he tell you that you must wait 4 years and longer for full obamacare ? I did not hear that. Did you learn about obamacare on CSPAN, as obama promised ? How many other promises did he break concerning obamacare ? CBO says no savings. We know there will be denial of care.

To wait 5 years to give it a chance isn’t going to happen. Not working in WY, MA, Canada, England, Cuba, etc.. Cost overruns and care restrictions.

In short order something like Republican plan can pass and begin in short order. With cash savings…

Bill Hedges of MO 6:44PM November 29, 2010

Difficult with One House.

I do not believe the Senate is as it was. Deaf to the will of the people. During obama’s campaign a Democrat from my State was a lap dog to obama. Her recent words has changed. If this is a barometer of motivation of Senate, could be helpful against obamacare. Remember CONTRACT WITH AMERICA.

Obama & Pelosi haven’t even tried to clear up what they claim as lies/misconceptions of obamacare. Wisely they choice most of obamecare to take effect after Presidential election. America not saving ALL THAT MONEY. Ha-ha in the mean time. Not helping ALL THOSE PEOPLE. Saving the ILL and their NESTEGGS. Another ha-ha.

If I recall correctly cap and trade passed House, other than that, nothing can pass with ok of heavily controlled Republican House approval in New Year:

“The New Labyrinthine Bureaucracy of Obamacare (159 New Ones) to Streamline and Decrease Cost Of Healthcare”

“Below is a list of new boards and commissions created in the Obamacare bill“.

1. Grant program for consumer assistance offices (Section 1002, p. 37)

2. Grant program for states to monitor premium increases (Section 1003, p. 42)

3. Committee to review administrative simplification standards (Section 1104, p. 71)

4. Demonstration program for state wellness programs (Section 1201, p. 93)

5. Grant program to establish state Exchanges (Section 1311(a), p. 130)

6. State American Health Benefit Exchanges (Section 1311(b), p. 131)

7. Exchange grants to establish consumer navigator programs (Section 1311(i), p. 150)

8. Grant program for state cooperatives (Section 1322, p. 169)

9. Advisory board for state cooperatives (Section 1322(b)(3), p. 173)

10. Private purchasing council for state cooperatives (Section 1322(d), p. 177)

11. State basic health plan programs (Section 1331, p. 201)

12. State-based reinsurance program (Section 1341, p. 226)

13. Program of risk corridors for individual and small group markets (Section 1342, p. 233)

14. Program to determine eligibility for Exchange participation (Section 1411, p. 267)

15. Program for advance determination of tax credit eligibility (Section 1412, p. 288)

16. Grant program to implement health IT enrollment standards (Section 1561, p. 370)

17. Federal Coordinated Health Care Office for dual eligible beneficiaries (Section 2602, p. 512)

18. Medicaid quality measurement program (Section 2701, p. 518)

19. Medicaid health home program for people with chronic conditions, and grants for planning same (Section 2703, p. 524)

20. Medicaid demonstration project to evaluate bundled payments (Section 2704, p. 532)".

Other 139 in link.

http://www.saveyourrights.com/government-control/the-new-labyrinthine-bureaucracy-of-obamacare-159-new-ones-to-streamline-and-decrease-cost-of-healthcare/

Not counting increase size of IRS and other exiting federal and State agencies. Including Medicare and Medicaid...

Bill Hedges of MO 6:17PM November 29, 2010

mr. roff. it would seem from your piece that you are one of the fortunate ones who has decent healthcare,well bully for you.it,s people such as yourself,and members of congress,who are in fine shape,who donn;t understand or donn;t care about the plight of many people who are not as fortunate.before we rush off to repeal the law it would seem more prudent to let the law be fully implemented and then,if needed,fix the parts that may not be working as they were intended to preform.this would insure that we have a healthcare system that benefits everyone.

bruce b of NV 5:01PM November 29, 2010

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement