The Tea Party Movement Is a Middle Class Revolt

October 7, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (22)

Richard Nixon popularized the idea that there existed in America a “silent majority” at odds with the values and vision of the leftist radicals who put the nation through a period of prolonged social upheaval back in the 1960s.

Today the “silent majority” is silent no more. As seen in the Tea Party movement the middle class, on whose shoulders the heavy burden of the nation’s economic health and well-being fall, are beginning to rise up.

They are not social outliers. They are leaders in their communities. They are the kind of people de Tocqueville would have seen as the glue keeping the country from breaking apart. After decades of being taxed and regulated and spent into hard times, seeing their futures and their childrens’ futures put out to sea on an ocean of red ink, watching their economic liberty and their ability to pursue happiness erode, they are fighting back.

The people who form the elite political and media culture laugh at the idea. In a major disconnect, they see the Tea Party movement as just a network of nuts, flakes, and right-wing anarchists that foolishly fails to realize just how good the government has made for them. They are to be tolerated, coddled, perhaps even feared but it is hard to believe they form a lasting threat to the establishment.

[See editorial cartoons about the Democrats.]

The signs that things are changing are everywhere, even though some people will only be able to see them clearly in the rear view mirror. Typically the pool of people seeking federal office, for example, has been the province of local elected officials, the very wealthy, lawyers, the sons and daughters of those holding other offices and union activists. Now, for many of the same reasons that the Tea Party movement came to be, that’s changing.

Call it the revolt of the middle class.

According to the National Federation of Independent Business--the nation’s leading organization of small business owners--32 of its own members are running for Congress this cycle, more in a single year than ever before.

Why? NFIB’s Lisa Goeas puts it well when she says, “Our members feel that the over-reach of government is putting their ability to own and operate there businesses in jeopardy. That level of alarm is what has spurred them to take matters into their own hands and run for office.”

“Independent business owners can only be pushed so far” Goeas says, “before they get involved in a serious way.”

[See editorial cartoons about the economy.]

It’s not just small business either. The consistent push toward a “government-first, patients last” national healthcare system like Obamacare sent more than one physician into the political arena. According to one source, 47 doctors sought a seat in Congress in this election cycle, more than three times the number currently serving there. Auto-dealers too have responded, now that the Obama administration decided it could, as part of the partial nationalization of General Motors and Chrysler, abrogate contracts and force dealers to close their doors.

All across America the people derided by the likes of Sinclair Lewis as “Babbitts” are awakening. They are beginning to reassert themselves, pushing back, saying “No” for the first time in a long while. It may not last--the politicians may find a way to mollify them or they may give up and go home. Or they may change the country. Either way they are a more serious, more substantive movement--even in what the smart set patronizingly likes to point out are its inconsistencies and innocence--then what the columnists and commentators who deride them are willing to acknowledge.

Tags:
2010 Congressional elections,
small business,
Tea Party,
Congress,
healthcare,
Richard M. Nixon,
healthcare reform,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"Tea Party Candidates are being financed by outfits that supported the TARP Bailouts and outsourcing American industry. " That is the craziest thing I ever heard in my life. The candidates I (and my other middle-class friends) are campaigning for are not being "financed" by anyone except for individuals and small business owners in their communities.

Interesting that YOU SAY THAT, and THEN YOU SAY THIS in the same article:

"the only thing they are promising to do is to shut down the government."

Besides those statements being MORE OPPOSITE than my grandmother is compared to Saddam Hussein, that line about "shut down the government" is a pile of FEAR-MONGERING CRAP the Democrats (like John Olver) are using to attempt to scare people so they can keep their jobs.

UNTIL YOU SAID THAT, I thought maybe you were confusing the Tea Party Express with the Tea Party Movement. It's obvious you just want socialism in this country, the same as the PAID/THREATENED Union members who were forced to carry "Socialism Now!" signs in Washington, D.C. a few weeks ago!

Silent No More of MA 1:20PM October 24, 2010

What a lie.

Policies of the Tea party candidates are diametrically opposed to the interests of the American middle class.

While I initially thought the tea party fiscal conservatives ideas would be good,but now I see the whole Tea Party movement has been hijacked by the big money of same crowd that swindled the country into this recession.

How is it that the so-called Tea Party Candidates are working against getting things done and the only thing they are promising to do is to shut down the government. How is it that all the candidates who call themselves Tea Party Candidates are being financed by outfits that supported the TARP Bailouts and outsourcing American industry.

Its no coincidence that what remains of tea party anger has been hijacked to kowtow to the policies that are screwing the middle class. What was the Tea party has been bought off by the moneyed special interests to just stick the knife in deeper.

Jeff of KS 8:45PM October 13, 2010

Teacher - if I may be so bold; what exactly do you see in the Tea Party movement that would lead you to describe them in the haughty and unfavourable light you've intoned? What is it about a group of people from across the various levels of our society, gathered together in pursuit of something that has clearly been taken away from them (freedoms, choice, individual rights, economic decisions that have failed spectacularly, etc.) that would lead you to believe that these fine folk are even remotely "dangerous?"

Further, what is there about Tea Partiers at any level of political involvement that makes you so uneasy as to downgrade their status as "normal Americans" -preferring instead to call them out as "Tea Baggers" or some other nascent slur?"

I'm sorry but your elitist petticoat has just been put on display for all to see. And it's dirty, ripped, and shorn of any dignity it might've once had. For, you see, it is precisely your demeanor, lack of understanding, and dismissive attitude that has brought about the movement you now seek to condemn.

Oh, and thank you. We're fully awake now.

Mr. Butler of MN 10:25PM October 12, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement