Poll: Independent Voters Have Turned Against Obama, Democrats

September 13, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

Resurgent Republic, the polling organization formed by former RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie, pollster Whit Ayres, and others to survey the national mood on key issues finds opposition among swing voters to President Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress has "calcified."

A national survey of 1,200 voters released Monday (with a sample made up of 800 Independents and 200 Republicans and Democrats each) found significant trouble for the party in power going into the November 2010 election.

Among the findings:

  • Independents express overwhelming disappointment with the direction of the country and by a 2-to-1 margin hold an unfavorable opinion of President Obama and his job performance;
  • The public’s disappointment with President Obama goes beyond the faltering economy, with many of them deeply concerned about his specific policies and the way he has governed, particularly his perceived failure to change the way Washington works;
  • Independents continue to look more like Republicans than Democrats, most notably on government spending;
  • Swing voters view President Obama as further to the left of Democrats in Congress on issues related to the proper role of the federal government;
  • Support among Independents is highest for candidates who oppose stimulus spending and government bailouts, favor tax cuts to grow the economy, prioritize reducing the federal deficit, and believe “drastic change” is needed to redress a federal government that has gotten “out of control.”

"On health insurance, government spending, environmental regulation, and immigration enforcement," Resurgent Republic says, “Independents are more aligned with the conservative argument, which is also closer to their placement of congressional Republicans.” The critical voter bloc in the upcoming election, they also perceive Obama as "further to the left of congressional Democrats on health insurance, government spending, environmental regulation, and immigration enforcement."

The concerns expressed by Independents, on the other hand, generally marry up nicely to what the Republicans in Congress have been saying for much of the last two years. More Independents, the survey found, “favor individual responsibility in purchasing health insurance than those who support universal coverage provided by the federal government” and that the federal government “should do more to exercise fiscal discipline even in light of more spending to help the economy.”

The Democrats should also find alarming the news that nearly two-thirds of voters now believe the country is on “the wrong track,” including an astonishing 70 percent of those who call themselves “Independents.” Likely voters, the survey indicates, feel even more strongly, with “wrong track” drawing more support than “right direction” by a 65 percent to 27 percent margin.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
recession,
2010 Congressional elections,
economy,
bailout,
immigration reform,
Congress,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
healthcare,
economic stimulus,
healthcare reform,
polls,
unemployment,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Steve, you have left off some important information in your diatribe against those evil rich folks. Many small businesses, representing 2/3 of all small business profit, fall in that top bracket that you obviously feel very passionate about raising. Are you saying that during a recession (high unemployment), raising costs for these businesses is a good idea? How about on top of the additional costs that they may be facing due to compliance with new health care regulations? Do you fear that hindering small business will stifle economic growth which is a key factor for how much revenue actually comes into the government?

Much of your thesis seems encapsulated by your final comment: "The rich have too much money." Obviously you view this as a moral "wrong." Further, you taking their money you view as a moral "good." What makes you feel that you will use their money more efficiently in the economy then they will? What will you spend it on that will have the maximal multiplying power? Is your investment knowledge that good or are your spending priorities that noble? The arrogance of central planning seaps through your commentary.

John of MD 9:27AM September 16, 2010

As usual you never address any real issues. You just gloat over the fact that so many Americans are stupid enough to support insane people. How sad!!

steve of IL 7:58PM September 15, 2010

Mike Castle lost...

Sarah supported winner...

Bill Hedges of MO 10:48PM September 14, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement