Why Is the Media Ignoring Discovery Channel Gunman's Radical Views?

September 3, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (20)

James Lee, who walked into the headquarters of the Discovery Channel Wednesday, taking hostages, was an environmental radical who believed people were destroying the planet.

According to a manifesto of sorts he posted on the Internet, Lee believed that “Civilization must be exposed for the filth that it is” and demanded that the Discovery Channel and its affiliated networks stop airing programs “encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants and the false heroics behind those actions.”

Oddly enough, it’s a view shared--perhaps not directly but at least in the same general neighborhood--by any number of prominent thinkers and talkers who take a dim view of the impact mankind has on the planet.

Lee, who not only holed up with hostages but had pipe bombs strapped to his body, was, in the general sense, antimankind--as he said on his Web site in a somewhat distorted echo of the prophecies and prescriptions of Zero Population Growth founder Paul Ehrlich. “Saving the Planet means saving what's left of the non-human Wildlife by decreasing the Human population. That means stopping the human race from breeding any more disgusting human babies!”

Ehrlich, it is worth noting, predicted in the late 1960s in his book The Population Bomb that the resource needs of mankind could not keep pace with the growth of the world’s population and, as a result, global famine would be commonplace by the mid-1970s or early 1980s.

According to news reports Lee was also influenced, alarmed, and possibly even spurred to action by former Vice President Al Gore’s film An Inconvenient Truth, which holds out equally dim prospects for the future of mankind as long as necessities like the internal combustion engine are allowed to continue in operation. Lee himself touched on that issue as well on his Web site, writing that is was important to:

Find solutions for Global Warming, Automotive pollution, International Trade, factory pollution, and the whole blasted human economy. Find ways so that people don't build more housing pollution which destroys the environment to make way for more human filth! Find solutions so that people stop breeding as well as stopping using Oil in order to REVERSE Global warming and the destruction of the planet!

If James Lee had been a member of a Tea Party group or an activist opposed to abortion rights the national media would be in the throes of ecstasy, describing his actions as the product of some sort of loosely organized effort that should have all Americans living in fear for their lives and their liberty. The Department of Homeland Security would probably announce the creation of some sort of task force to investigate his activities and root out his followers and allies. And President Barack Obama would no doubt address the issue in his weekly radio address. But Lee was neither of those things. He was a radical on the edge of an already radicalized movement but one that continues to gain uncritical acceptance among the general public. Perhaps it’s time for a reassessment.

Tags:
Al Gore,
Tea Party,
media,
environment,
Barack Obama,
terrorism

Reader Comments Read all comments (20)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I remember when that guy crashed his plane into the IRS building, the left piled on when they thought he was a TEA Partier. Turned out he was more from the political left, and they shut up.

Still kind of a pointless article; we know why they ignore leftist terrorism.

Rich of CO 10:48PM September 08, 2010

Sir, with all due respect, you draw the weakest tangential links to last week's unfortunate events, which many of us here locally witnessed up close, perhaps including you. From what's reported on Lee right now, he wasn't affiliated with any organized environmental movement. Second, Lee's family has described his history of anti-social, if not extreme schizoid behavior, which some armchair psychologists in the press are too busy speculating about rather than confirming. As you suggest, it's possible his behavior may have been influenced by misanthropist rhetoric among some U.S. environmentalists. But for you, a pundit who works in same "the media" you so eagerly truncheon, it's smarmy to twist this unfolding situation into scoring points for your base. You know damn well local police and the FBI have long-established profiles for "lone wolf" shootings. Your "if the tables were turned" point on the president's address is mere hyperbole.

With a nod to the Tea Party, your rhetoric rightly notes the unfairness, and perhaps hypocrisy, of linking lone cranks to social movements with legitimate concerns. That may be logical, but it doesn't automatically end the discussion. I'm sure you recall the White Citizens' Councils of the '50s and '60s. You remember: the middle-class, "legitimate" face anti-segregationists who tacitly backed KKK terrorism against southern blacks, and overtly backed their disenfranchisement and economic reprisals used against them. They were, in effect, the South's Stasi, imposing authoritarian principles through the deployment of local police with no fear of reprisal.

Here some 50 years later, I too am frustrated with this presidency's priorities, and nor am I "liberal." But I'm fence-sitting on the Tea Party precisely because I fear the inchoate anger coming mostly from disaffected whites, many who aren't stereotypically "poor," under the tutelage of narcissistic, mercenary gadflies, especially as all our economic fortunes weaken. You ignore this to our country's peril, even with our possibly one-term, "post-racial" president. Long before Glenn Beck's so-called "March on Washington," I observed at another Tea Party event here that people weren't so much united in anger over economic or social policy, but reveled in a seemingly endless mass of racist T-Shirts, placards, and vile comments. Worse is the fork-tongued pandering by some GOP politicians to the party's worst elements. Some of us clearly see opportunists' attempts to hoard power, and the frightened masses' desire to turn back the clock. If you've ever resided under that lethal boot heel, you might understand my concern.

Separately, while I agree some activists are too quick to doubt human ingenuity, and some are just plain nuts, it's foolhardy ignore warnings about our precarious ecological position. Here, the Lee incident is used as a straw man to attack the broader environmental movement. Rather than finding common ground, sir, you stoke the fire.

Cheryl of DC 2:46PM September 07, 2010

James Lee was clearly confused. Although he was clearly a believer in the Church of Global Warming and its patron profit, err, prophet, Mullah Gore, he must have missed the memo that insisted moonbat Lefties such as himself disarm themselves and bow down to lick the boot of Federal authority which alone has a monopoly on guns death and violence. A good true leftist tree hugger would have been feckless and paralyzed without that nasty firearm. God damn America and its Constitutional Rights. May one day Mullah Gore and his Nation Socialist Democrats take our guns and impose servitude once and for all so that they may enjoy their waterfront Montecito mansions without interruption. Lee missed the fact that while he was being shot to death to save the planet Al Gore was getting a 4 hour long frontal massage en route to his hot tub.

stanl of FL 11:41AM September 06, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement