Obama’s Coming Tax Hikes Will Cripple the Economy

August 13, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (17)

Rather than be in the middle of “recovery summer,” the U.S. economy is still flat on its back. And it’s likely to get worse after the first of the year, thanks to the tax hikes the White House is planning.

Americans for Tax Reform, a nonprofit taxpayers’ interest group, reports that the Obama administration, with the support of congressional Democrats, “have said they want to raises taxes in the top two income tax rates in January 2011.” Under their plan, the group says, the current 33 percent rate will automatically rise to 36 percent and the 35 percent rate will increase to 39.6 percent, negatively affecting families and small business owners earning at least $200,000 per year.

[See a slide show of 5 bad Democratic policy ideas.]

The impact of these tax increases will be felt throughout the economy but particularly in the small business sector, where much of the nation’s job creation comes during an economic recovery. The reason for this, ATR says, is that:

  1. Unlike corporations, small businesses usually don’t pay their own taxes. Rather, business profits flow through to the business owner. The business owner pays taxes on her small business by adding the profits to her income tax form. Therefore, personal income taxes are the same thing as small business taxes.
  2. According to the IRS, most small business profits pay taxes in households making more than $200,000 per year. The IRS keeps track of two types of small business income: sole proprietors, and “pass-through” entities like partnerships and S-corporations.
  3. Mature small businesses make a majority of the profits and employ a majority of the workers. The Census Bureau reports that the top 3 percent of small businesses employ a majority of everyone who works for a small business. Raising taxes on these most successful of small businesses will cost jobs.

According to a number of estimates, a majority of U.S. small business profits will face a tax rate hike under the Obama plan. Instead of putting profits back into the business in the form of equipment updates, new hires, and expansion, the small businessmen and women who make up the backbone of our economy will be called upon to underwrite, in the name of “raising taxes on the rich,” Washington’s addiction to overspending.

 

Tags:
recession,
corporate taxes,
small business,
economy,
business,
taxes,
federal budget,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You keep vomiting up the same nonsense. Show a link!! The CRA, which is what you're too stupid to realize that you're actually referring to, had NOTHING to do with the subprime meltdown. Moderate and low income people got CRA loans but so long as they were conforming loans, which were the only ones made by banks operating under CRA rules, these people didn't default. It was the 3.5 million subprime loans that had nothing to do with the CRA lending regulations that had a high default rate.

More than half the subprime loans made were by private mortgage lenders that were not regulated by the FDIC and had no CRA lending obligations. They made subprime loans to for profit knowing they were going to package and sell every bad loan on the secondary mortgage market. The Federal Reserve and John C. Dugan, Bush's Comptroller of the Currency, already made this clear. From the Dallas Fed report;

"The subprime market took off in the late 1990s. By 2006, the market had surpassed $600 billion and accounted for one-fifth of mortgage originations. Independent mortgage companies made 46 percent of these loans; banks and thrifts made 29 percent. Affiliates and subsidiaries of banks and thrifts made the remaining 25 percent. While subprime lending existed before the 1990s, the flagrant and widespread abuses in this market did not occur until the late 1990s. The originate-to-distribute model presented the opportunity for independent lending institutions and mortgage brokers to make substantial profits. In this model, originators sell, or “distribute,” loans to the secondary market and have less incentive to scrutinize the riskiness of these loans than if they keep them. Their income and fees are based on volume of loans sold, so their focus is on quantity. Before the subprime market fell, securities backed by these loans yielded high returns and were thus appealing to many investors...There appears to be a direct correlation between the quality of subprime loans and the degree of regulatory oversight. Nondepository mortgage providers such as mortgage lenders and brokers are regulated by 50 different state banking supervisors instead of a federal body responsible for comprehensive oversight. Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan reported that these companies “originated the overwhelming preponderance of toxic subprime mortgages” and these loans “account for a disproportionate percentage of defaults and foreclosures nationwide..."

Dugan also made clear that, "Only 6 percent of higher-priced loan originations made by banking institutions and their affiliates in 2005 and 2006 went to lower-income borrowers or borrowers in lower-income neighborhoods within CRA assessment areas..."

http://www.dallasfed.org/ca/bcp/2009/bcp0901.cfm

Elsewhere in this same report, Dugan stated that more than half of all subprime loans were made to middle and upper income mortgage borrowers who did not live in CRA areas and did not take out loans under the CRA program.

steve of IL 11:35AM August 16, 2010

That's what he wants , cripple the economy , big goverment to the rescue , more people dependant on goverment , get over the 50% of goverment dependants thus ensuring democrat votes .

Otherwise people would have to work and be responsable for what they do , what a concept , not relying on someone or something else . Doesn't fit the progressive agenda .

Hunter of WI 12:26AM August 15, 2010

That's because it's wrong - and no on in government is doing anything about it. It's all about buying votes to re-elect Obama. He won't raise taxes on anyone under $250K (at least obviously) until he cinches re-election. Then you all can expect tax increases.

The problem is (as many people have mentioned) that spending is not being addressed. The one thing that surprised me when Obama took office (and yes, I voted for him) was that he immediately started spending all over the map. There was no overall plan, nothing - just spending all in the name of "stimulus", Well, if that was stimulating - you could have fooled me.

We need an overhaul of the tax code that takes the 50% non-pay rate into account. As someone earning over $250K I have no problem whatsoever paying higher taxes - IF some effort is made to get others to pay as well, not just those in my bracket. And furthermore I have no problem if the money is used to reconstruct the American economic deficit. We can start eliminating it, or we can waste more money on give-away junk to win votes.

We have another one coming in 2013 in the guise of a health care reform tax. It is an increased Medicare tax for over $250K's especially on unearned (especially invested) income. This is yet another tax burden that is being used to spend more money not save it. If we change the Medicare tax, it needs to go to Medicare - not overall health "reform" - especially a bill that does not reform anything.

40-30-20 years ago, people thought of government as having a more legislative function. Now it is thought of as a way of life and a source of free things. We are running out of free lunches, and that has been shown not to work anyway - just look at Europe.

Jon of CA 4:11PM August 14, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement