Obama's Stimulus Is Only Boosting the National Debt

August 12, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Anyone who still thinks the Obama stimulus was a good idea and helped the U.S. economy up off its back would do well to take a look at a new report--titled "Summertime Blues"--documenting just how wasteful and mismanaged it is.

[See a slide show of 10 wasteful stimulus projects.]

Prepared by Sens. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and John McCain of Arizona, the report highlights 100 projects funded through the economic stimulus package that run counter to its stated purpose as investments “in long-term priorities to create and sustain economic growth.”

[See who donated the most to McCain's campaign.]

“When Congress passed the $862 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in 2009, otherwise known as the stimulus bill, it passed with assurances that it would stem the loss of American jobs and keep the economy from floundering,” the report says. “Eighteen months since the law’s passage, millions of jobs are still gone and the economy is as uncertain as ever. The only thing getting a boost is our national debt--the stimulus has helped push it 23 percent higher, to $13.2 trillion, a new record.”

Among the projects highlighted in the report are:

  • $554,763 to the U.S. Forest Service to allow it to replace the windows in a visitors center at Mount St. Helens, Wash., that is currently closed and which the Forest Service has no plans to re-open.
  • $1.2 million to convert an abandoned train station in Glassboro, N.J., that has been boarded up and unused for 40 years, into “a museum, public meeting space and welcome center.”
  • $1.9 million to allow the California Academy of Sciences to send researchers to the Southwest Indian Ocean Islands and east Africa, to capture, photograph, and analyze thousands of exotic ants--with the photographs to be posted on AntWeb, a Web site devoted to organizing and displaying pictures and information on the world’s thousands of ant species.
  • $677,462 to researchers at Georgia State University to study why monkeys respond negatively to inequity and unfairness.
  • $712,883 to researchers at Northwestern University using stimulus money in an effort utilizing “artificial intelligence” that will mine jokes from the Internet and “use them to create hilarious presentations that mimic real-life comedians.”

 Despite this, Congress is gearing up for stimulus, round two. Will they never learn?

Tags:
Tom Coburn,
Barack Obama,
Congress,
economy,
economic stimulus,
recession,
John McCain

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The stimulus DID save and/or create millions of jobs; it is clear that it did or we'd be an even bigger mess. Obama can't fix the mess Bush made overnight. When Bush left office, the unemployment rate was already 8% and rising. Jobs continued to be lost at an alarming rate. Was all this supposed to suddenly change on January 20th, 2008?

Obama ran on a platform that included a fiscal stimulus plan. Those still unemployed are angry and blame him for their continued suffering. This is absurd. McCain's tax cuts of a further 10% off the top margin would have made federal deficits even worse with still no job creation. It would not even have put a bubble on the stock market since the market was already depressed having lost more than half its value. The fact that the Dow has regained more than 55% of its value to date is proof that the stimulus worked. The fact that the US treasury bond market is still growing while paying only 3% annual interest on long term bonds is proof that the bond market fears neither deficits nor inflation; the US treasury bond market is the safest place to put one's money right now. All other options are either too risky or likely to return less than 3% average annual profit.

This is why there is no investment, spending and job creation; The private sector is saving not spending due to fears of deflation NOT deficits. It was the recession that created the current deficits, not the other way around. The federal government has amassed trillions in private savings with which to stimulate the economy. The private sector wants to save, not spend. There is no crowd out effect. Interest rates are declining not increasing. The government should spend to stimulate the economy. The private sector isn't doing this; they're saving their money. Two renowned economists, one of whom was a former FED vice chairman, assess the stimulus in a new study;

"...effects of the fiscal stimulus alone appear very substantial, raising 2010 real GDP by about 3.4%, holding the unemployment rate about 1½ percentage points lower, and adding almost 2.7 million jobs to U.S. payrolls. These estimates of the fiscal impact are broadly consistent with those made by the CBO and the Obama administration."

http://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/documents/End-of-Great-Recession.pdf

The WSJ explains one cause of anti-stimulus sentiment;

"An urgent need to draw new investors to buy muni bonds gave birth to the taxable, federally subsidized "Build America Bonds." The experiment worked. It helped revive the muni-bond market, keeping local construction projects going...Build America Bonds pay more than corporate bonds with similar ratings, even though municipalities rarely default. The big losers: High-end taxpayers who have fewer tax-exempt bonds to buy."

http://online.wsj.com/article

/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748704398804575071170893255254.html

To this we might add corporate bond sellers who must now compete with the new Build America Bonds.

steve of IL 8:17PM August 13, 2010

True, some of these projects seem wasteful and pointless, but the immediate effect was that they kept people employed or maybe even allowed more people to be hired. So I disagree with the author, the national debt is not the only thing getting a boost.

I'm not saying it was wise to replace windows on that unused visitor center in Mt. St. Helen though. There certainly must have been another project that had more of a lasting benefit to the community - maybe replace the windows in a school that's actually occupied and in use.

I would like to see some more light shed on what the criteria are to approve these projects. My opinion is that we should first prioritize projects with these characteristics:

- USA jobs being created or maintained

- USA sourced materials being used

- lead to improving a USA asset (e.g. better transportation infrastructure, better communications, better technology, better education system, better human and social services,better USA competitiveness...)

Roger Hsieh of CA 3:02PM August 13, 2010

Every day we receive reports of how the government is wasting tax payers' money. This problem is shared by Republicans and Democrats. Neither group is immune from government waste.

As a nation, we have two choices:

1. Continue on the same path and destroy our economy and nation.

2. Elect representatives who will take a long term view of what is good for the nation, not their special interest groups. Hold these representatives accountable for their actions. Fire them if they don't do what is good for the nation. We can no longer afford or tolerate the status quo in government.

Jim in Seattle of WA 2:36PM August 13, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement