The Republican March to Majority Is Stalling

July 22, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

The latest Gallup Poll shows, as my bloleague Robert Schlesinger wrote here Wednesday, that registered U.S. voters now--by a narrow margin--prefer to have the Democrats in charge in Congress after the next election.

Ostensibly there is no reason for this. Another Gallup survey just out shows Congress is one of the least respected institutions in the nation. The Pelosi-Reid legislative agenda is largely moribund, despite claims by the Democrats that this has been the most successful Congress in many decades. Of course these claims are made by many of the same people who say nothing has been accomplished because the Republicans have blocked everything. Perhaps one can have their cake and eat it too. [See who supports Reid.]

The Gallup analysis suggests the shift in preference for which party should control Congress in the future can be accounted for by a change in the opinions of the self-described independent voters, who probably hold the balance of power in the upcoming election. Independents are motivated by ideas rather than by party affiliation. At least they tell themselves that they are. The change in the polling should suggest to the Republicans that they need to propose a positive, reformist agenda as the basis of the upcoming campaign.

[See a slide show of 5 key issues in the 2010 elections.]

The Republicans will not win back control of Congress if their candidates just stand around like Frankie and Annette Moon expecting to surf into office on an anti-Obama wave. Yet this is just what many of their consultants are advising them to do, lest they say something that will alienate the voters.

To win in November the Republicans, while not needing to replicate the Contract with America, need to develop a consistent set of themes that set them apart from the majority. It is not enough to not be the other guy; you have to stand for something--a concept that House Minority Leader John Boehner seems to get.

[See who gave the most to Boehner.]

A veteran of the Contract, Boehner has been incrementally assembling a series of proposals that could form the basis of a positive, proreform agenda. The latest, which he unveiled Thursday through the GOP’s America Speaking Out website, is to support legislation originally offered by Texas Republican Rep. John Culberson to require that all bills be available online for at least three days before Congress votes on them. [See who supports Culberson.]

A proreform idea, it stands in sharp contrast to the way Reid and Pelosi managed the healthcare bill and may load down the lame duck session with additional surprises. It’s the kind of thing that Washington insiders easily dismiss as fluff but that real Americans understand and, more importantly, vote on.

Tags:
Congress,
2010 Congressional elections,
John Boehner,
Nancy Pelosi,
Harry Reid,
Barack Obama,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The republicans have never stood for anything. They always trot out the same old slogans and the uneducated buy it. Then they get into office and fatten their own wallets and take care of big business and the rich. This

is nothing new.

Sos of AR 1:23PM July 23, 2010

I had to expound on Steve of IL's comment, and second that of Matt of IL. The only violence I have seen to date is from the left. In fact, I just listened to King Shabbaz in Philly call for the murder of crackers, especially cracker babies and the women who breed them like baby factories. Would you call that "violent?"

Us Tea Party people are great at yelling and hollering, and that's about it. Oooh, how violent! But I will promise you one thing: we are all patriots, and we will not be pushed over that cliff. The Constitution is our banner, and Democrat and Republican alike need to keep it as our rule. When that goes out the window, so do all the rules.

We live by rule of law, not rule of people. When there is no law, there is anarchy. When the law is warped to fit the government, there is oligarchy. Neither will be allowed to exist in this country, except it be over the bodies of those who will only live as free men. Samuel Adams said this:

"Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say 'what should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship and plough, and sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom - go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!"

Think about that, and about on who's side yo will stand.

TPaine of FL 10:17AM July 23, 2010

...much like Mt. Vesuvius the night before!!!

It appears Peter Roff had nothing else controversial to write about!

havahavana of CA 6:40AM July 23, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement