Democrats' Energy Bill Efforts Are Running Out of Gas

July 19, 2010 RSS Feed Print

The Democrats’ inability to move an energy bill through Congress has been a major disappointment to those who thought Barack Obama’s election meant an end to the nation’s reliance on fossil fuels. Despite their early optimism, buoyed by the successful passage in the House of a cap-and-trade energy tax bill, it’s looking more and more like nothing moves in the Senate before August.

“The most likely scenario for energy and climate legislation is that the Senate will pass no bill at all prior to the August recess,” says Capital Alpha Partners’ James Lucier, whose firm puts the odds of no bill “at 40 percent and rising.”

Part of the problem is the calendar. With a draft bill expected no sooner than the week of July 26, the effort to pass something—anything--runs up against the Democrats’ need to proceed to a vote on the confirmation of Elena Kagan and other business that should take them right up to the start of the break.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on Elena Kagan's Supreme Court nomination.]

They likely won’t get much help from the Republicans, who seem to be rejecting the idea that the now-capped well in the Gulf of Mexico provides a sufficient reason to move faster. “You have a crisis over here and you try to use that as an excuse to pass a piece of legislation over here,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said Sunday. “I think there are things in the energy area we could and should do. What I am not interested in doing is using the oil spill as an excuse to pass a national energy tax.”

[See who supports McConnell.]

It would be one thing if there was broad agreement on a specific approach. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid could twist enough arms and secure a GOP defection or two to get something through, but as Lucier points out, nobody agrees on what the bill should look like. “There is no consensus on a positive agenda that touches all four bases--carbon, renewable electricity, efficiency, oil spill--and gets to sixty votes,” says Lucier. “Meanwhile, there is a long list of guaranteed ‘No’ votes on issues that split the Democratic caucus: carbon, EPA regulation, rural coops, transmission, offshore royalties, offshore drilling, ethanol, oil and gas tax increases, and more."

[See which members of Congress get the most from the electric utilities industry.]

Compounding the problem is that there are a number of House members who, having voted for the energy tax back when it looked like a certainty, now find themselves exposed and vulnerable in an increasingly hostile political climate. They want the Senate to act so they can get a bill to a conference committee, ostensibly to iron out the differences that exist between the bills, but in reality to give incumbents the opportunity to cast a few votes to blur the issue and provide political cover.

In the face of this pressure it is possible Reid will try to keep the Senate in session past the start of the scheduled break in order to get something done before Labor Day--but that would put him at odds with members of his own caucus, who, seeing a national environment that is increasingly favorable to the Republicans and puts control of the Senate in play, feel the need to get home and campaign--Reid among them. It is just possible that, as far as a major energy bill goes, the Democrats have run out of gas.

Tags:
global warming,
Mitch McConnell,
Harry Reid,
2010 election,
energy,
Congress,
Barack Obama,
democratic party,
energy policy and climate change

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This "issue" about the white farmer is all spin. There was an incident but the USDA employee apologized and personally reconciled with the farmer for an incident that occurred about 24 years ago. As usual, the right wing spin machine omitted the most important part of the story in a deliberate effort to be misleading. This shows how unprofessional FOX News is;

Sherrod, 62, told the paper the short clip left out the rest of the story, when she says she eventually worked with the farmer to help him avoid foreclosure, and became friendly with him and his wife. At the time, Sherrod worked with the Georgia field office for the Federation of Southern Cooperative/Land Assistance Fund...In an interview with the newspaper today, Eloise Spooner, the wife of the farmer, called Sherrod a "friend for life." She said Sherrod helped her and her husband save their farm in rural Georgia and "kept us out of bankruptcy." Spooner, 82, said she spoke to Sherrod on the phone today and will publicly support her."

http://www.aolnews.com/politics/article/black-usda-official-shirley-sherrod-resigns-in-flap-over-white-farmer/19560922

The real story is USDA obstruction of justice for thousands of Black farmers.

"Under the 1999 settlement, the government paid more than $1 billion to about 16,000 farmers. John Boyd Jr., a third-generation farmer from Baskerville, Va., and founder of the National Black Farmers Association, says his group pressed for more aid because as many as 80,000 farmers didn't know about the settlement and missed filing deadlines...Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who is also a farmer, pushed for legislation included in the 2008 farm bill, co-sponsored by Obama when he was in the Senate, to give farmers excluded from the first settlement "another bite at the apple."

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-02-24-black-farmers-usda-settlement_N.htm

Congressional action was, indeed necessary for about 86% of the farmers covered by the suit who were denied restitution by the USDA.

"For the 81,000 farmers denied compensation, there is no future opportunity to obtain relief. Even though USDA has admitted to civil rights abuses, it withheld some three quarters of the $2.3 billion that the settlement was worth. Without intervention by the United States Congress, these farmers will never receive the compensation they so clearly deserve."

http://www.ewg.org/reports/blackfarmers

According to the very same report;

"...the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) willfully obstructed justice by deliberately undermining the terms of a 1999 landmark civil rights settlement with African American farmers. As a result, the vast majority of African American farmers have been denied compensation that the court, in approving the settlement, described as "automatic."

Historic discrimination against Black farmers is a far bigger issue than the phony one the race baiting right is drumming up just to foment more hate in an already highly charged atmosphere.

steve of IL 3:23PM July 20, 2010

"The United States needs our own objective, transparent 'climate truth commission' to think-through global warming.

-- Robert Moen, www.energyplanUSA"

If any of you think the Regress-licans can think through ANYTHING, you're sniffing your own methane.

The KoolAid is Red of WA 11:56AM July 20, 2010

Guess what media matters and the sorry mainstream media don't matter , only to usefull idiots .

Hey , how about the Obama USDA official that got fired for racial comments at a NAACP meeting , ( wouldn't help a farmer because he was white ) guess I missed the NAACP saying no , no , she must be a Tea Party member .

Oh yeah , healthcare is now a tax , how funny steve is so often full of it .

I don't think we could ever have a bigger LIER and shallow person in the White House as we have now .

Hunter of WI 10:27PM July 19, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement