Polls Show Why Republicans Could Win Big in November

July 12, 2010 RSS Feed Print

Things continue to look bad for the Democrats. Appearing Sunday on NBC’s Meet the Press, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs conceded there are enough congressional seats in play to deny the Democrats another turn as the majority party in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The outcome, he suggested, hinges on whether or not President Barack Obama can convince enough people that the way he and his party have led the nation over the last two years is still preferable to the way the Republicans would govern.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on the 2010 campaigns.]

Gibbs has likely been reading the polls, which on the surface show the contest for control of the House is at least competitive. Looking further down, however, it appears that the Democrats are in a deep hole.

The latest Gallup poll, taken among more than 1,300 randomly selected registered U.S. voters, has the Republicans with a 2 point edge over the Democrats. The GOP’s 46 percent to 44 percent lead is inside the plus or minus 3 point error margin, meaning the race looks like it is a statistical dead heat--but there’s more to it than that.

Polls of registered voters, while useful, measure opinion against status--not behavior. A person who is registered to vote is, it should be obvious, not as certain to turn out and cast a ballot as someone who is a likely voter, either because they say they are almost certain to vote in the next election or because their voting history suggests it is highly probable they will. Probing further into the new data Gallup found that “Republicans continue to hold a significant edge on this potentially important indicator of voter turnout rates” by 13 points--which is down from the average 17-point lead the GOP has held since March but is still part of a consistent trend.

“Each month that Republican parity with the Democrats is maintained reduces the likelihood that the Democrats will move into a substantial lead before November,” the polling firm said. “Prior Gallup analysis has found that the party preferences for Congress seen in the first quarter of a midterm election year generally carry through to Election Day. The only recent example of a major change as late as the summer or fall came in 2002, when Democratic support surged in July and August, but diminished by Election Day.”

[See a slide show of 5 key issues in the 2010 elections.]

The momentum away from the Democrats is almost certainly fueled by a case of buyers’ remorse among Independents who bought a package when they voted for Obama only to find they did not get what they were expecting. But it is still momentum away from the Democrats, not toward the Republicans--a qualitative difference that will be increasingly important in the weeks and months ahead.

In its analysis of the data Gallup concludes that “historical trends suggest that a slight Republican lead on the generic ballot among registered voters--or even a statistical tie--would translate into sizable Republican seat gains in Congress on Election Day, given their typical advantage in voter turnout.” That does not mean, however, that the GOP has sealed the deal with the American electorate. To do that they need to offer, in contrast to what Obama has done, what former House Speaker Newt Gingrich used to call “An agenda worth voting for.”

Tags:
Robert Gibbs,
2010 election,
Congress,
Barack Obama,
democratic party,
Newt Gingrich,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You also ignored Rasmussen's Poll, the most conservative polling organization, showing not only that most Americans want a public option but that the reason the final version of the Health Care reform became unpopular was that the public option and the Medicare Buy in option for those under age 65 was dropped. The mandate was quite unpopular but favored by the insurance industry as I've mentioned several times. Why don't you address my points. All you do is spit back right wing propaganda that isn't relevant to the arguments made. To believe that the idea of a public option is unpopular is to utterly ignore reality.

steve of IL 6:20PM July 14, 2010

“Alleged” Steve ?

“SurveyUSA seems to be a respected polling service. I don't know about their alleged connections to MoveOn.org but they seem to know what they're talking about. ”

Did you read your own link Steve ? Let me quote from your link:

"SurveyUSA data collection for this project was underwritten by MoveOn.org. Poll respondents did not hear MoveOn's name. SurveyUSA is an independent research company and does not endorse any particular cause or ideology. SurveyUSA has no stake in the outcome of any health-care legislation and is a disinterested party in the health-care debate."

Notice I give full quote not ‘3 word quote’ as you like to do Steve.

http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=5ba17aa2-f1b9-4445-a6b8-62b9d1ba8693

Some problems with SurveyUSA

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0210/Abramowitz_challenges_blog_surveys.html

“However, SurveyUSA is aware of no other research company that can match the local and hyper-local research credentials of SurveyUSA”

Not Nation wide:

http://www.surveyusa.com/index.php/hyper-local-polling/

Anyhow, you're beating a dead horse.

By most measure there will be less Democrats in Congress in January. Public option could not get passed with super majority. What chance then.

More likely obamacare will fall by the wayside:

“53% Favor Repeal of Health Care Law”

Monday, July 12, 2010

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/health_care_law

Depending on the strength of Republican win, either obamacare will be repealed or changed. If Democrats stay strong may have obamacare as is. After years and years of waiting.

Bill Hedges of MO 6:17AM July 14, 2010

Tax cuts generate more revenue into the goverment , proven , politicians can't quit spending , get a clue ..

Today we have unfunded pension plans , unfunded entitlements , unfunded S. S. , unfunded unemployment extensions , people unfunded buying houses they shouldn't have , unfunded Post Office , medicare , mediciad .

We have an underfunded goverment , because they keep spending every dime they get and hope to get . Until that changes , we will be an unfunded nation .

You can not keep taxing the "rich" , they and their jobs will leave or they will run out of money , then what ?

Hunter of WI 7:40PM July 13, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement