Republicans Could Win the Senate in 2010 Elections

July 6, 2010 RSS Feed Print

The United States Senate is sometimes referred to as “the world’s greatest deliberative body.” With its members elected to six-year terms--sometimes in cycle with the presidential election and sometimes out of it--the Founding Fathers intended it to be a governor, not just on the power of the presidency but on the passions of the people.

Lately, however, the Senate has seemed more vulnerable to prevailing political passions than either the House or the presidency. In 2006 and 2008, for example, the Republicans saw their wings clipped in a flurry of anti-Bush sentiment that caused them to lose every race that was on the bubble because of environmental factors as well as the personal political issues on which races of this type often turn.

The next election, to borrow a term from the financial analysts so much in disrepute these days, may produce an overdue market correction. In just one cycle the GOP may leap from being a barely relevant minority to being a carefully constituted majority.

[See a slide show of 5 key issues in the 2010 elections.]

Almost every objective analysis of the seats up in 2010 finds that the Republicans are highly likely to hold on to what they currently have. This means no Republican incumbents seeking re-election would be defeated and they would retain control of seven open GOP seats in New Hampshire, Missouri, Kentucky, Kansas, Ohio, Florida, and Utah.

The Democrats are not so fortunate. Most forecasters already concede they will lose seats in North Dakota, Indiana, Arkansas, and Delaware--putting the GOP at 45 and the Democrats at 53, plus independents Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Bernie Sanders of Vermont who vote with the Democrats to organize the chamber. [See who gives the most to Sanders.]

Of the remaining seats, as pollster Scott Rasmussen and others suggest, there are at least seven and perhaps as many as ten where the Democrats will have to fight hard to retain control. Those seats clearly in the toss up category include the open Democratic seats in Illinois and Pennsylvania, a formerly Republican seat in Colorado and seats in Washington state, Wisconsin, and California, where the GOP has had major success recruiting serious challengers to incumbents the polls indicate are quite vulnerable.

“If the election were held today,” Rasmussen says, “the GOP would be favored to pick up a few more than the four seats already moving in their direction. However, it is impossible to know how these races will look in November. While individual candidate performance will obviously play a role, the overall political tide may be an even bigger factor.”

Tags:
2010 election,
Bernie Sanders,
Senate,
Joe Lieberman,
Congress,
democratic party,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Opine

It is far too soon to evaluate the Senate final structure on November 12. Pollsters are notoriously wrong, even after the facts are in.

The Tide for the Left has gone out. The USA Electorate is quietly, but certainly evaluating each and every candidate. No longer a GOP, a Dem, a Indy, but a principled, honest and fiscally sound candidate will win. The USA Electorate, as I have said elsewhere is finally, thourghly awake. Polls do NOT reflect this.

Semper FI

WE WILL PREVAIL

end

Tenn Slim of TN 10:09AM July 12, 2010

I would quote other polls but you would have a reason to dislike. Have you accepted the Senate results in MA yet ?

I would have provided conflicting poll results if I was you to make my point. You know back my statement.

Bill Hedges of MO 4:24PM July 07, 2010

This is the lamest piece of 'analysis' I've seen lately. Rasmussen? Why not just quote Karl Rove?

SaneInPa of PA 4:13PM July 07, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement