Obama's National Debt Dwarfs Bush's and Reagan's

June 8, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

It is a measure of the nation’s economic illiteracy that the most recent debt projections have not received more coverage. Sure, most people can tell Karl Marx from Harpo but it is highly unlikely that they can distinguish between Adam Smith and Will, even if he were to bite them on a visible hand.

As reported Friday by Bloomberg, the total United States debt under President Barack Obama is poised to explode past its statistical post-war norms to a point where it “exceeds the value of the nation’s annual economic output.” Total federal government debt rose past $13 trillion for the first time in June 2010 and is on track to surpass U.S. Gross Domestic Product by the year 2012, according to projections just issued by the International Monetary Fund.

Part of the problem is that the U.S. economy is not growing. The stimulus spending that President Obama and the Democrats who control Congress said would solve the problem and bring about an early end to the recession has not worked as advertized, leaving unemployment figures at their highest point in decades and doing little to spark productive economic activity.

Right now, according to a variety of estimates, the U.S. economy, if it grows, will do so at something less than its statistical average in the latter half of the 20th century, which puts it at below 3.2 percent.

There are those who will undoubtedly point to the large deficits run up on a yearly basis under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush as proof that what is happening under Obama is just business as usual. And they would be wrong.

Under Reagan and under Bush the U.S. economy grew, and strongly, making the annual new debt to GDP ratio something that could be absorbed as increased revenues filled federal coffers. Under Obama, the new spending along with the projected tax increases that will occur when he allows the Bush tax cuts to expire will lead to a decline in future federal revenues, making the new total debt--nearly half of which has been amassed under the current president alone--something that may handicap the U.S. economy for at least a generation.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
recession,
Barack Obama,
George W. Bush,
economy,
debt,
Congress,
GDP,
federal budget,
Ronald Reagan,
economic stimulus

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Republicans Sink Bailout — But Why?

by Steven Stoft, September 29, 2008

"We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House," —Minority Leader John Boehner

The leading House Republican claims the Republicans sank the bailout because they didn't like Pelosi's speech. Really? They sent the Dow down 777 points or 7% and cost the entire stock market roughly $1 trillion because they didn't like Pelosi's speech.

I just don't think the Republicans are that vindictive and misguided. So why'd they do it?

"We’re all worried about losing our jobs. Most of us say, ’I want this thing to pass, but I want you to vote for it — not me.’" —Paul Ryan, Republican-Wis.

Ryan is making sense. No one would trash the American economy to spite Pelosi, but they might do it to get elected.

Here's the big picture. Bush and ultra-free market Republicans opposed regulation of the financial and mortgage industry for years. Then comes the time to pay the piper. Paulson does his best to clean up the mess, but it gets totally out of hand.

The economy is in real danger as Paulson, every banker, and Wall Street knows. They beg Congress for help (and Bush and Cheney join in—they hate it but they are desperate.)

Now the Democrats don't like Wall Street, don't like the deregulators who made the mess, hate Bush and Cheney, and know their constituents hate the bailout. But they see the danger. So they get a couple of compromises to protect tax payers, and then 60% of them sign on. But they don't want to all sign on because, like Republican Ryan says, everybody wants the other guy to vote for it, and the Dems don't want to do all the voting for it while the Republicans point their fingers at them and call them big spenders.

But the Republicans—more than 2/3 of them voted against it. They had said they would deliver 77 votes for, which would have been only 39% for it, compared with the Democrat's 60% for it, and they would not even do that to save the economy.

Sources for quotes

Shirley of TN 10:38PM July 10, 2011

todays big problem -debt ir effect on a country's growth....

http://www.debtmanagementplan.co.uk of IN 2:41AM February 10, 2011

The US Military was going to construct a compact Military that no two nations could fight, and succeed, But all of that money has been spent totaling over 2 trillion on The Bush/ Iraq debacle, and now Afganistan. Surely The US could have contracted hunting of terrorisrs much cheaper then this portion of our debt. I come from a state of two Demo US Senators, and Maria Cantwell is the biggest Bush/ war sell out in our states history. Our boys are still dying, and she will never take an ounce of responsiblity. Quit spending somewhere??? How about these wars. The only money being saved is at KBR/ Haliburton. " Our citizens do not need to think. We will think for them." Dick Chenney

Govlove of WA 7:18PM August 09, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement