Oil Spill Cleanup, Census Can't Hide Obama's Jobs Problem

June 4, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

The jobs figures released Friday are not good news for President Barack Obama.

Despite the massive amounts of government spending that the White House said would stimulate the U.S. economy, only about 41,000 of the new jobs created were in the private sector. The vast majority of the new jobs, about 95 percent, were jobs in the government sector, many of which are tied to the ongoing U.S. census.

Clearly the stimulus is not working, at least not as advertised. The economy is still struggling as Obama fails to show any kind of real leadership beyond being the first one in line to shovel federal tax dollars out the door toward so-called shovel ready projects.

Economist Larry Lindsey, who crunched the jobs numbers even further, argues they are even bleaker than they may seem.

Lindsey's analysis of the data indicates that as many as one-fifth of all the new private sector jobs may only be the result of the need for massive clean up operations in the Gulf of Mexico following the blowout of BP’s offshore oil rig.

“Employment in support of activities for the mining industry was up three percent (in April 2010), or 8,000 workers on top of a 5,000 gain” the previous month, making it “safe to assume,” the former Federal Reserve governor wrote, “that much of these jobs are being created to clean up the mess.”

[See photos of the Gulf oil spill disaster.]

This is not, as Lindsey suggests, the kind of economic activity that “makes one cheery” about the U.S. economy’s long term prospects. It is also not an endorsement of Obama’s approach thus far to either problem--the continual high unemployment rate or the oil spill. Instead the president’s standard pattern, one embraced by his fellow Democrats, has been to point fingers at other people like Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, as though he were still in campaign mode. But they are not president any more--he is, and he needs to start showing some leadership, leadership that does not involve being the first one to point out why these problems are somebody else’s fault.

Tags:
Gulf of Mexico,
George W. Bush,
economy,
oil,
Ronald Reagan,
economic stimulus,
Barack Obama,
White House

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Diasalbed veterans looking for clean up oppurtunties looking for clean up employment oppurtinties. Please respond,We as a crew of 2 or more are interested in clean up effort.

Daniel J burke of MS 12:53PM June 12, 2010

Rigling has it exactly right. First things first--reinspiring cash flow by attending to the financial industry's near collapse. There are no shortcuts at all to jobs created in the private sector: consumer spending has to be up, foreclosurers have to end, tax revenues have to be back to normal, and so on. Then, businesses will start hiring--and ONLY then. Tax cuts to stimulate jobs creation are for different times and circumstances; those used successfully by Ronald Reagan had a totally different set of problems and circumstances behind them.

Roff is, as usual, meeting his deadline with gloomy second guessing and really should get out of that rut with some original thinking. Lord knows, we need it with all of the pap straight out of the Middle Ages we hear daily on talk radio and TV.

Ron W. Smith of UT 1:23PM June 08, 2010

We all are dissappointed with the huge number of lost jobs and resulting pain. Consider however the alternatives had the current AND the previous administration not taken extraordinary efforts to recover the economy.

The world economic network, grid, structure was on the point of collapse in late 2008 and early 2009. The velocity of money was nearly zero. Banks and businesses were holding what little cash they had in fear of further contraction. Had the collapse continued and the economy failed, we very likely would have entered a period of even worse economic activity, massive unemployment, potentially twice or more of current levels.

So

Consider the alternative had nothing been done. The results are disappointing but better than the alternative.

A more mportant question is, what do we do now to stimulate private economic activity? It seems that banks, large, regional and local, need incentives to increase lending to worthy small business. The lack of capital on Main street remains the #1 impediment. BUT - until they repair their ballance sheets and capital reserves, these banks are constrained.

Until cash flow and lending recover, the economy will remain constrained.

Richard Rigling of FL 10:10AM June 08, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement