Obama's Approval Rating Gap

June 1, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

The latest Gallup poll finds that President Barack Obama remains more popular than his policies. A survey of 1,049 adults 18 years of age and older living in the United States found 54 percent view him favorably while 43 percent see Obama in a negative light. His favorability numbers, which relate to the man, not the job, have consistently been five to seven points higher in the Gallup survey than his job approval numbers, which measure what people think of the job he is doing as president.

What does that all mean?

Well, for starters, it means that the American people are naturally predisposed to like this president no matter what he says or what he does. In fact, with the possible exception of Nixon in 1968 and 1972, every presidential election since the end of World War II has been won by the candidate whom the voters sensed would be better company over a cold, frosty pint.

Kennedy, in 1960, was certainly more appealing and more likeable than Nixon. Reagan came across as more likeable than either Carter or Mondale. And Bill Clinton is still more fun than most of the folks in Washington today.

In 2008 Barack Obama, with all the historical considerations that surrounded his candidacy, came across as more appealing than Arizona Sen. John McCain, who could never quite get past his “Hey you kids--Get off of my lawn!” demeanor. [See who contributes to McCain.]

By contrast, presidential job approval numbers relate specifically to performance and are a measure of a president against himself. By engaging in a reckless spending spree, by failing to take command of the activities surrounding the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and by jamming an unpopular health care bill that means higher taxes and fewer choices for most Americans while unemployment continues to be a national concern, Obama comes across--specifically to Republicans and self-described Independents, as not exactly being up to the job.

As a matter of politics, these numbers indicate that the Republicans must walk a fine line in their opposition to Obama.

If the GOP attacks on Obama remain focused on his performance as president--e.g. to question the way he has handled the current problem in the Gulf of Mexico, they will be on much safer ground politically than they would by suggesting that the offer of a job to Democratic Rep. Joe Sestak in exchange for his dropping out of the Pennsylvania Senate primary might constitute an impeachable offense.

It is one thing to criticize Obama for his policies. It is quite another, the data over time suggests, to do anything that appears to criticize the man--which may be the underlying reason why the president’s decision to forego the a Memorial Day wreath-laying at Arlington National Cemetery has not really moved his numbers down.

Tags:
John Kennedy,
Joe Sestak,
Richard M. Nixon,
Walter Mondale,
Jimmy Carter,
Congress,
Barack Obama,
John McCain,
Ronald Reagan,
Bill Clinton

Reader Comments Read all comments (17)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The worst president in modern times. He could not manage a lemonaid

stand. Any idiot can read a teleprompter.

john of FL 6:44PM July 04, 2010

Politics is all about being the most popular. You cannot be unattractive and win the Presidency or almost any political seat, some exceptions apply especially smaller seats.

Obama did not win because he was black , to say that is clearly racist. He won because he best represented people's frustration on the state of the nation during the elections. He is an elegant speaker and aroused people to vote for him. He will be very difficult to beat come 2012 especially if the economy is back in a boom, which statistically and hopefully for all Americans sake it will be. Personality goes a long ways look at the Kennedy-Nixon debates. Or even Clinton charm won both of those elections.

Mr look here of GA 10:27AM June 24, 2010

Wade,

What are you like 5? This comments sounds like liberal statements dictated to a child. I like obama. I am not a racist. I agree with what the liberal media tells me.

Here are FACTS: It is wrong to deny a man a job because of the color of his skin - to do this is clearly racist.

FACT: It is wrong to GIVE a man a job because of the color of his skin - this is also clearly racist.

Obama was not critized for his inexperience, because the liberal media calls that racist... which is not a fact, just a stupid tool to manipulate people with.

And to Muser,

Clear every day sense? How much clearer could every day American's have been that we did NOT want his healthcare bill?

Clear as in his stance on TRANSPARENCY??? If he's so clear and transparent why are there more "closed door" meetings than ever before.

Yes, Obama is clear if you're head is in the sand, as yours clearly is.

orlandojvc of FL 9:00AM June 24, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement