Kansas Republican: VAT Tax Would Cripple U.S. Recovery

May 28, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt is demonstrating the kind of leadership that is sorely needed in Washington right now.

Fearing that a commission chartered by President Barack Obama and chaired by former Clinton White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles and former Republican U.S. Sen. Alan Simpson will recommend the introduction of a value added tax to pay down the debt all of Obama’s new spending has accrued, Tiahrt has authored a resolution asking Congress to go on record against the VAT.

[See which industries donated the most to Tiahrt.]

House Resolution 1245, written by Tiahrt and co-sponsored by 32 of his colleagues, expresses “the sense of the House of Representatives that the Value Added Tax is a massive tax increase that will cripple families on fixed income and only further push back America’s economic recovery.”

According to Tiahrt, his anti-VAT resolution is intended to put Congress on record as opposing a massive tax increase of this type, which he says is “the wrong path for the American economy and the working families of America.” As he points out, the VAT was first enacted in Europe in 1967, at a time when the United States and Europe both taxed about 27 cents out of every dollar of national income. Since the VAT is a sales tax that is imposed on goods and services at each stage of production, the true cost is ultimately hidden from the end user. Moreover, it is highly regressive, hitting unfairly the wallets of low and middle income wage earners while being a massive revenue machine for the government.

“Since the introduction of the VAT in Europe, its average tax take has gone from 27 percent to 41 percent, nearly a 50 percent increase in just four decades,” Tiahrt says. 

A member of the Class of 1994, Tiahrt is one of those activist House members who have consistently tried to change the way Washington operates, especially when it comes to issues of taxes, spending, bailouts and debt. Instead of imposing a VAT on the U.S. economy, Tiahrt says he would much rather see Congress adopt a pro-growth approach to the problems facing the American economy by taking up issues like tax relief and simplification, liability reform, regulatory reform, healthcare security and energy independence, which is the kind of thinking that is much needed today in the nation’s capital.

Tags:
Todd Tiahrt,
recession,
Kansas,
income tax,
sales tax,
debt,
Congress,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

hiiiiiiiii good articles to u.s news and good bissness and idea

That's because McCain genuinely has separate opinions from Bush on many topics, the strategist tells U.S. News. He adds that, "It happens to be the best thing to do politically this year" because Bush is so unpopular and McCain needs to show he is his old main.

ponting of MT 5:15PM June 19, 2010

Probably the only thing we need to know about the VAT is that it is generally disliked in countries that have it. In this country--what with federal income taxes, state income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes--implementing a VAT would a bit much. In states with no state income taxes, the VAT could be more easily absorbed, but those states are few in number.

So, any talk about the VAT really ought to begin with what each person's total tax liability is before the VAT and what it would be after. That way, we all start knowing what our personal tax burden will look like.

What, though, about PayGo? Pay for all undertakings up front, not disguised in overall federal liabilities, ever increasing and never ending? My first candidate for PayGo is our total expenditure as a nation on the combination of national defense, homeland security, nation building, and foreign aid designed to gain the cooperation of other countries. Contrary to popular belief, very close to 60% of federal expenditures annually end up in that hopper, much of it disguised in categories other than "Defense." As a debtor nation of some notoriety nowadays, we can't afford that. With PayGo, we'd not want to, and all talk of a VAT would soon dissipate like yesterday's weather.

Some would say, no, it's entitlements spending that's causing our ever deeper indebtedness. True, it accounts for a lot, but given a rewards system in the U.S. that rewards only achievement, not just hard work at whatever level, social safety net programs like Medicare, Social Security, etc. are necessary. Look to the Middle Ages and Victorian England for two spectacular examples of what happens when cheap labor is prized and no safety net exists. Once you get into the ugly that was then, you'll not want it on your watch, lest the gates of Heaven close on you. PayGo before such entitlements were voted into effect or into expansion would no doubt have been a factor in limiting them. But, so too, PayGo would've had a remarkable influence on changing the nature of rewards in the private sector. Just think about that.

Any talk about a VAT, in other words, needs to occur with everything else presently the case in the United States considered. Instituting PayGo the minute the next fiscal year's budget is being thought about could have a wondrously clarifying effect in the minds of those now careless in how they think about "necessary" and "unnecessary." It is my guess that once we see how almost 60% of our annual budget is being deployed, we'll repent of past sins--like thinking the projection of American power around the world produces benefits in excess of expenditures.

Ron W. Smith of UT 6:19PM June 01, 2010

Somebody has to pay the expenses of government. The value-added tax seems to work well in Scandinavia and much of Europe. 24% Norwegian tax does hurt a little, but not as much as their taxes on gasoline, home transfers, and new car taxes. In Book 4 the free e-book series "IN Search of Utopia" (http://andgulliverreturns.info) a Swedish study was discussed which indicated that some are around 485 is the maximum tax that people will generally pay. The Scandinavian countries are at about that level. Of course they have strong social welfare systems. America's taxes on gasoline are so low compared with Europe's. The total taxes we pay, according to a study released this week, is under 10% of our income. This is definitely too low if we're going to have Medicare, Social Security, subsidized housing, a huge military experience, food stamps, FREE education. and the many other benefits we have grown to expect. To call the tax regressive is appropriate only under certain circumstances and criteria. What really seems to be regressive is our national debt which is an anchor on our economy and on our individual buying power. We can't just keep talking about taxing the rich, because there's so many loopholes. It seems to me that a VAT tax and a flat income tax, along with other luxury taxes would be the fairest way to go. The VAT might also make people think twice before having a child that they will have to feed and clothe when VAT is applied. And remember the VAT is generally applied to goods and services.

Bob O'Connor of CA 3:11PM June 01, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement