D.C. School Reform? Public Schools' Absurd New Condom Policy

May 24, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (11)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Officials in the District of Columbia, which has some of the worst-performing public schools in the nation, are concerned that their program for the distribution of free condoms in those schools is failing. According to the Washington Post, “High school students and college-age adults have been complaining to District officials that the free condoms the city has been offering are not of good enough quality and are too small.”

If that alone was not bad enough, students are also complaining that it is embarrassing to have to ask school nurses and other health professionals for them.

In response, rather than review the program to see if it is even something the schools should be doing, D.C. officials have decided to begin dispensing a more trendy and more expensive brand of condom, and have begun “to authorize teachers or counselors, preferably male, to distribute condoms to students if the teachers complete a 30-minute online training course called ‘WrapMC’--for Master of Condoms,” the Post reports.

By involving classroom teachers in condom distribution, the D.C. schools are arguably going beyond the idea that it is a public health program. And the data is somewhat startling. “The number of free condoms that the District dispenses has been steadily increasing. The health department distributed 3.2 million last year, including about 15,000 in schools. The city, which has 600,000 residents, is on pace to hand out more than 4 million condoms this year, having distributed about 2.5 million so far,” the Post says.

Expanding the program to include items that are more popular, potentially, with students than what is already being offered won’t exactly break the bank. The program cost about $165,000 last year, according to the Post. The new condoms are more expensive, but by just pennies each. Nevertheless, one can question the judgment of city officials who think it is really the job of the school system to make available brands that are more consumer friendly than is currently the case.

The public schools exist to teach the 3 R’s--reading, writing and ‘rithmetic--not as laboratories for social engineering experiments. The idea that the condom distribution program needs to be modified as D.C. is doing without questioning its very existence is not only a concession to a particular point of view but is an example of big government run amok.

Tags:
students,
sex,
teachers,
Washington, DC,
AIDS/ HIV

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

quickly becomes either a broken condom or one that isn't worn in the first place.

If you can't even fit it on, then it isn't going on! And yes, the larger sizes might cost slightly more.

These kids need to be given standard responses to peer-pressure lines (useful for gracefully getting you out of booze, drugs, sex), and techniques to negotiate safe sex.

Abstinence is great, but you'd better know what your other options are so you can make an informed choice and can't plead ignorance. Because at some point, you aren't going to abstain. Or were you hoping that would be the case until marriage? What is the current marriage rate for these kids in particular? Low.

Let's leave abortion and adoption out of the picture: neither should be needed in the first place. Used correctly, condoms don't fail.

Lydia Gynoa of CA 1:45AM May 27, 2010

Someone who actually lives in the District of Columbia. Who has children in the DC public schools.

Condom use is not being used only in the schools but also for adults in DC.

This is a public health issue and the money is not taken out of the school budget.

Great for you if you live in a world where no one has premarital sex, no one has HIV or other sexually transmitted diseases, and no one has sex outside of marriage. Many other people do not live in that world and I think it is not so bad to offer a way to people to help protect themselves from getting a virus that could kill them. And by the way, it is very expensive for the public health system to treat HIV and viral hepatitis. Condoms may be much less expensive in the long run.

Agreed, of course condoms like anything else is not 100% effective---mostly because of not being used properly (see training regarding the proper use prior to being permitted to distribute them) and not because of failure of the prophylactic. Still, 99% effective or even 90% effective (probably a low estimate) is much more effective than NOT using anything at all when having intercourse.

Melissa in DC of DC 12:55PM May 26, 2010

This might be a moral issue. Too bad she wants to move away from that idea. After all, atheism doesn't allow any room for such thoughts.

Condoms simply are unreliable. Think about it, one of the brand names for condoms is "Trojan." I'm sorry, but the Trojans lossed the war just as people will lose the war on "safe sex-education." Abortion is not an option. It is flat out murder. The embryo is a human being regardless of its size, shape, level of development, enviroment, or dependency on the mom. To say otherwise is to ignore the facts. Condoms don't completely prevent STDs, pregnancies, or scarred emotions.

Also, when sex is used between one man and one woman in a marriage, there are fewer problems. Chances for HIV and other diseases go down considerably. If the woman gets pregnant and they don't want or can not support the child, there is adoption.

Dryfire of IL 9:46PM May 25, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement