Elena Kagan Reverses Course on Supreme Court Nominee Testimony

May 11, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

So much for the “Kagan Standard.” Our nation’s newest Supreme Court nominee has already reversed herself.

Back in 1995, as written here previously, Kagan wrote of her belief that nominees to the nation’s highest court should have to answer questions about “the votes she would cast, the perspective she would add (or augment), and the direction in which she would move the institution.”

Now that she herself has been nominated it is being pointed out that she no longer believes what she wrote. As reported by the Daily Caller, an Internet-based publication, a senior White House aide is reminding people that Kagan has changed her mind.

Briefing reporters in the White House, Ron Klain, described as “a top legal adviser to Vice President Joe Biden who played a key role in helping President Obama choose Kagan,” pointed to Kagan’s own testimony during her confirmation hearings to be U.S. Solicitor General as an indication her views had matured.

“She was asked about it and said that both the passage of time and her perspective as a nominee had given her a new appreciation and respect for the difficulty of being a nominee, and the need to answer questions carefully,” Klain said.

Nevertheless, the standard Kagan previously set is a good one, at least as far as nominees with a record as thin as hers go. During her confirmation hearings, senators should hold her to it.

Tags:
Elena Kagan,
Barack Obama,
Congress,
Senate,
Supreme Court

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

i love to fart in elevators. i like to do it several different ways. sometimes i fart real loud, laught outloud and then act like nothing happened. sometimes i fart silently and yell out i did it and then act like nothing happened. sometimes i fart silently and look around like someone else did it and cough a few times. finally sometimes i fart outloud and then just act like nothing happened. i love doing this. i can't get into an elevators without doing it. it's just so funny to watch people's expressions especially when its a nasty fart.

fart of CA 3:49PM July 03, 2010

dude, most republicans are extreme successful individuals. it's hard to say how ignorant they are. they wipe their a s s e s with the things you depend on in everyday life.

me of CA 3:47PM July 03, 2010

Are you a fiscally conservative voter/taxpayer? Do you hate to to see taxes wasted on welfare for unwed poor moms who refuse to abort for fear of "going to Hell?" If you are, you know ProLifers force people to have lots of babies who become tithers. It costs $500,000 to support one poor unwed mom & one child to age l8. But see how cheap abortion is. To ten weeks, it costs only $527. To l6 weeks, it's $735. To the end, abortion still costs only $1379. Compare that with $500,000 & see that it saves us taxpayers $498,630!! It means Big Government to pay all those people who dole out welfare, ADC, food stamps, health care & subsidized housing. As a fiscally conservative ProChoicer, i hate Big Government subsidy of poor families. In 1973, the Court made the civil government stop enforcing church law that bans abortion. Roe v Wade says there's a right to privacy concerning abortion. But the best argument for Roe is that it's about MOBILITY of women. It's about our right to MOVE AROUND, to GO where we want to be & that includes going to abortionists. We need taxpaid contraception, voluntary sterilization & abortion. ProChoicers are best money managers as genuine fiscal conservatives.

aura dawn veirs of CA 8:52PM May 12, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement