Is the Government Out to Get Toyota?

April 8, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

It may just be that U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood forgets to engage his brain before he puts his mouth in gear. Either that or he is deliberately trying to make it harder for Toyota to maintain its share of the American automobile market.

Right now, thanks to the way the media has hyped the story, it would be hard to blame a consumer who questioned the overall safety of Toyota's passenger car fleet. LaHood has not helped matters, missing wherever he can the opportunity to calm the fears of the American public.

Back in February, he raised more than a few eyebrows when he suggested the proper response for anyone concerned about the safety of Toyotas was to "stop driving" them, a comment he was later to retract as an embarrassing misstatement. Now LaHood, who has just announced the Japanese automaker faces a record $16.4 million fine, is accusing the company of being "safety deaf" and says he would not be surprised if further reviews of internal company documents find additional problems with the vehicle fleet.

It sure sounds like he is trying to convince people not to buy Toyotas, which is a seemingly odd move considering the number of people in the United States whose jobs depend on that one company, its manufacturing facilities, and its dealerships. Then again, Toyota workers are not members of the powerful United Autoworkers Union, a key part of the Democrats' electoral coalition. And the U.S. government--of which LaHood is a most senior official--is not a part owner of the company.

These are just some of the reasons to wonder about the way in which this investigation has been conducted and if its spokesmen, including LaHood, have been impartial and even-handed. Their job is not to alarm the public but to reassure the American people that everything is being handled in an appropriate and judicious manner. Like the one they have regarding the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's preliminary investigation, announced earlier this month, into the possibility that vehicle brake lines have corroded in 6.2 million General Motors Co. vehicles.

According to the Detroit News, "NHTSA's investigation--made public today--includes 6 million 1999-2003 GM pickups and SUVs and 189,000 2003 2500 heavy-duty pickups. The investigation covers all models built--not all models remaining on the roads--so the actual number could be lower than 6.2 million."

"The complaints allege the loss of braking effectiveness due to brake line rupture because of corrosion," NHTSA investigator Chris Lash said in a government filing. "In 37 of these complaints, the brake line failure was confirmed by a dealer inspection." This is a calm and reasonable way to approach the problem about which no one, including the folks who run Government Motors--excuse me--General Motors should have any complaint. It's just too bad the standard does not seem to be equally applied.

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I bought a brand new GM product out of blind patriotism. This is 2010 model year and they still can't make a decent car. I would seriously like my 10 year old Honda back...it was a better car at 120k miles than my new GM product is at 20k miles.

This is pathetic...

Toyota has done NOTHING but push the safety envelope and create new technologies to make people safer...whereas Gov't motors has done so only because of gov't mandates.

Does it matter... of MI 10:42AM May 05, 2010

Have I missed something?

Has Toyota not recalled vehicles in question?

Has its CEO not been anything but concilliatory and cooperative?

This sounds like a witch hunt which is what made me google this story to begin with.

Mary Artemis of CT 9:30PM April 26, 2010

You see, this is what happens when you have no control over products manufactured in other countries, or foreign products made in this country. It's like the toys from china a while back with the lead paint. You didn't know it was there until your child got sick and the doctor discovered the child had lead posion. the same thing goes for the toyotas no one really checks out these things until someone is killed. If it starts, stops, and steers on the way out of the plant it passes and is good enough for the americans. Call me crazy or what ever, but when I go to a store I check labels. If it doesn't say "MADE IN THE USA" I won't buy it. I check labels in the grocery store, same deal. I drive two cars (but not at the same time) both are MADE IN USA. (I have a fifteen year old chevy van and a twenty-one year old camaro. Both run great and pass the emissions test with flying colors and have never let me down on the road). At least I know there was some sort of control when the product was being made. My brother-in-law has a toyota, and tried his best to get me to trade in my camaro on one. Never going to happen. Now he is trying to sell his with no takers. Now, this is just my view on things. You buy what ever you like and I hope you are happy with what you buy. As for me, I only buy American products.

woodenfrog of NJ 8:59AM April 22, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement