Statistics Show Stimulus Package Results Have Gone From Bad to Worse

Reader Comments

Back to blog

Bill Hedges of MO, you really should read the Moody's testimony to the government regarding the stimulus bill. Tax cuts are an incredibly inefficient way to stimulate the economy and create jobs. Ironically, one of the absolute best (and counter-intuitive) ways that studies have shown to stimulate the economy is to give more money (or benefits, same thing) to the unemployed.

When the average affluent American is given money by the government, history has shown that they generally either save it or invest it in an economic bubble, neither of which stimulates the economy. Money given to the unemployed or the poor, however, is immediately returned to the economy. People with money *may* want to create jobs, but everyone *needs* to eat. More people buying food creates jobs more surely than anything.

In numbers, for every dollar the government gives to the affluent, ~0.38 dollars of economic stimulus is generated. For every dollar given to the poor or the unemployed, ~1.70 dollars of economic stimulus is generated. Economic stimulus creates jobs, not money stagnating in the bank accounts of the affluent, and money spent on extravagances doesn't reach the pockets of the working class either. Unless, of course, you really think those yachts are built in the US.

How much further disproof do you need of the myth of "Trickle-Down" economics? It's a myth the rich are using their money to make into a truth because the only people it benefits are them. Look at our current situation - post-stimulus studies have shown that the stimulus money has wound up going disproportionately to the wealthiest Americans. Business stats show that layoffs are up, as are CEO salaries and bonuses, which some companies have been shown to pay for by laying off more employees.

After the stimulus, the affluent are out of the recession, but the middle class is still desperately struggling, the poor are worse off than they started, and the economy as a whole is still a total mess.

Temporary tax cuts, by the way, stimulate the economy by 1.02 dollars for every dollar spent. Making the Bush tax cuts permanent? ~0.35 dollars for every dollar spent.

The problem with the current tax system is that having high taxes in high tax brackets doesn't hurt small businesses. It hurts small businesses and small business owners that save or keep money they should be investing in their business. Under the Bush tax cuts, there is no tax incentive for any business execs to invest in their company to keep in a lower tax bracket. Such incentive, creatable with high tax brackets, gives companies a reason to create jobs. Right now, they spend less in taxes by not spending and not hiring. How the heck do the Bush tax cuts help people who want jobs?

Robert of MA 11:46AM December 20, 2010

There are 3-4 million small businesses in this country that have more control over the economy than anything.The gov. can not stiffle them,it must encourage them to invest and expand.Higher taxes and more mandates does not do that.As higher taxes on us doesn't re:VAT tax.

We as a country where and are more prosperous when there is and was a smaller goverment.Not all of our bosses are villians.I don't know about you,in my case,if my boss(co.owner)doesn't make money I'm not getting a raise.

Hunter of WI 10:17PM March 29, 2010

As does yours!

Mitchell of NC 6:17PM March 29, 2010

I never thought you would get it.

Like $15 trillion is not being invested in market. With obama's anti business attitude and punishment it will sit. Gov. money prompting it up now.

With Bush cuts private money was invested and creating jobs. Jobs is the trickle down.

Clinton caused recession helping unqualified home buyers destroyed the good of tax cuts. But is shown in the income it created to government.

Really not here to explain to you. your past history proceeds you.

Bill Hedges of MO 5:41PM March 29, 2010

It's just you and those like you, don't worry ewverything is going to be ok! WE have leader that is on the job.

Bill, what if those that make profits are the villains? What if they limit the amount of trickle down to only crumbs, in relation to their bottom line, what do we do, let about 30 or 40 guys control the world, and deem the rest of us as peasant here only to serve them at their lavish birhday parties and ski trips?

If everything about our system had been perfect and our country was once the prosperous nation it once was, then I too would agree that we shouldn't change a thing. However, we are in a total mess right now and we need resolution immediately. To put our hopes in the hands of greedy individuals, is like giving money to a dope fiend to go grocery shopping alone, when they come back you will have nothing because they spent out on themselves.

Governmnet doesn't belong in eveything we do as citizens, but the usual pattern of abuse of power seems to always play a factor. Without checks and balances whom is watching the money-holders. Even with checks and balances the good ones have learned how to "cook the books" and are essentially crooked, knowing that there money is there continued freedom, that doesn't seem vey american to me!

Mitchell of NC 5:15PM March 29, 2010

Kennedy, Regan, and Bush caused the longest Wall Street Bull Market in our history.

Unfortunately housing program began by Carter and greatly expanded by Clinton lead to our surmise. If only Democrats had not voted against Bush’s regulations, that may have save us from the harsh reality we are in.

Punishing Wall Street investors is not going to get the many $trillions sitting on the sideline instead of in stocks. Companies use that money for expansion and creating job.

Obama wants to make saps out of Wall Street. Most of you who have retirement funds are investors. The company you work for may be listed.

Is there abuse in Wall Street, of course. There is everywhere. Worst place is DC. You got the master thieves controlling the penny-ante crooks.

Punishing and making villains of those who make profits gives no incentive to take risks and create jobs. Reward/risk theory.

Bill Hedges of MO 2:57PM March 29, 2010

Is is just me, or do the rest of you sense a complete lack of committement toward the economy and job growth on the part of Obama's admin?

david of ID 11:19AM March 29, 2010

Yes...

CBO came out that obama's GUESS of 10 year National debt is $1.2 Trillion too low.

If common to be off, but not that much.

Bill Hedges of MO 1:06AM March 29, 2010

Anyone else notice how the actual results achieved by Obama's "stimulus" are pretty much the opposite of what he said would happen? For example, he said Alabama would gain 52,000 jobs, but instead they lost 58,000, while he said his stimulus would bring California 396,000 jobs, whereas they actually lost 586,300. Most of the other states reported similar results.

This can't be right, can it? It must be the GOP manipulating the numbers so that it only SEEMS our economy is shedding jobs right and left. In actuality, Obama's stimulus must be creating jobs, and the numbers are lying. You know, because up is down, plus is minus, and left is right.

ttnewton of AK 11:35PM March 28, 2010

Talk about someone stuck in the play book,where are you stuck? You talk about people not happy with America,who's trying to fundamentally change it? You still do nothing more than resort to the same ol names and talking points.Is it to much trouble to include some facts and substance?Something I can read and learn from,something to think about and may-be change my opinion.Thanks for leaving your typical racist comments out,now lets work on some facts and points.

Hunter of WI 4:30PM March 28, 2010

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement