Pelosi’s Comeuppance: Why Democrats May Sack the Speaker

March 12, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (19)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog 

No matter what the outcome of the elections next November, it is time to consider the possibility that the House of Representatives will have a new speaker in January 2011. 

Having made heavy-handedness a hallmark of her leadership style, Nancy Pelosi now appears well on the way to receiving her comeuppance, if not from her fellow Democrats then from the American people. National poll after national poll shows public approval of the job Congress is doing is at near-record lows--and someone has to take the blame for that. As the Democrats do not yet appear ready to toss President Barack Obama over the side, Pelosi seems the most likely choice. 

She has won herself few friends by trying--over and over--to force the House to vote on healthcare legislation a majority of Americans have said repeatedly they do not want. Rather than negotiate with the Republicans to produce a compromise, Pelosi has insisted that her Democrats go it alone, a decision that is going to cost her party dearly at the polls. A reduced majority--or a new minority--even though it would likely be more liberal than the Democrats' current majority, may not be in the mood to reward Pelosi's ineptness by handing her the gavel for another two years. 

Nor has Pelosi distinguished herself in the management of the House. She came to the speakership promising to "drain the swamp" after a series of ethical embarrassments cost the GOP its majority in 2006. Only she failed here as well, trying to build a small air force for herself during the initial days of the Obama presidency and by refusing to boot New York Democrat Charlie Rangel from the chairmanship of the Committee on Ways and Means. She has also failed, apparently, to distinguish herself in the way she dealt with the ethical missteps of another New York Democrat, Eric Massa, now resigned. 

Massa, as everyone now knows, resigned his seat in Congress earlier this week after allegations surfaced that he had inappropriate physical contact with members of his staff including, according to published reports, an intern. The House Ethics Committee had shut down its investigation into the matter because it felt it no longer had jurisdiction over him, given that he had resigned his seat. The House, by a vote of 402 to 1, disagreed Thursday, voting to encourage the committee to keep the investigation open--and with good reason. There is now a debate over what Pelosi knew about the allegations against Massa and when she knew it. 

According to a report that appears on the Fox News website, Pelosi's aides knew that concerns about Massa's behavior existed "as far back as October." 

Shades of Mark Foley. It is worth remembering that, shortly after the allegations concerning the former Florida Republican's contact with congressional pages surfaced, Pelosi accused the GOP leadership of having engaged in efforts to cover it up. 

As the Palm Beach Post reported on Sept. 30, 2006, Pelosi issued a statement calling for an investigation into Foley's activities in order to determine "when Mr. Foley sent the inappropriate emails, who knew of them, whether there was a pattern of inappropriate activity by Mr. Foley with pages or former pages, when the Republican leadership was notified, and what corrective action was taken once officials learned of any improper activity." 

Now that the shoe is most clearly on the other foot, it will be interesting to see how Pelosi and her fellow Democrats react. If the investigation moves ahead and reveals that Pelosi knew more about what Massa was doing than she currently lets on, she will become an almost unredeemable embarrassment to her Democratic colleagues. So much so that, even if her party does manage to maintain a much-reduced majority in Congress, it would be politically foolish for it to let her continue to preside over the House. 

Tags:
Democratic Party,
House of Representatives,
Nancy Pelosi

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Just bought this in the gift shop at the Capitol

The Nancy Pelosi Urinal Screen! Now you can do to Nancy Pelosi what she did to the American voters!

Hugh J of NJ 9:30PM March 25, 2010

I find it hard to understand how the american value system puts wealth ahead of decency and glorifies itself morally.

At last you have a President who actually has soul and conviction to do the right thing and you hound him ( of course largely because he has different colour and a different name) after the absolute sleaze-bags who have run your country into the ground - starting with Reagan whose intellect was best matched by a chimp.

You consider yourself fortunate in your freedom to bear arms - how primitive can the world get.

I consider the american intellect that emanates from the conservative end to be tribal and primitive. The reason why you are disliked now as a country and are fighting wars where you have no business to be is because you are a morally bankrupt country carrying guns into more civilised parts of the world.

I live in a country where people look after each other and have the ability to rise above greed and consumption to look at welfare and social security as our obligation to the deprived. Your lobbyists would not understand this.

You support dictatorship - if it supports you. Freedom and liberty is the last thing on your minds - you are convoluted in your logic as you twist it in any way to fit the occasion.

You are a tragic country awaiting a tragic future.

Thank god you got Obama.

You forget a short while ago you had Bush.

Sameer Kalra of AL 8:55PM March 22, 2010

This Democratic congress had decided it would vote in favor of the minority and disregard the desires of the majority of Americans. The majority were thus not represented properly by the elected officials. In essence, this congress told us to kiss their a** and comes November elections, ww will kick their a####.!

Jerry king of CA 2:11PM March 22, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement