Senate GOP Vows United Opposition to Health Reform Reconciliation

March 10, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

A unified Senate GOP let the Democrats know Wednesday that it will resist efforts to ram the healthcare bill through Congress using the legislative maneuver known as the reconciliation process.

In a letter to Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, the 41 members of the Senate Republican Conference announced they would vote as a bloc in order to remove the changes needed to "fix" the Senate healthcare bill that are necessary to winning the votes of recalcitrant House Democrats unhappy with the cost of the total package as well as the comparatively weaker language banning abortion funding.

As things currently stand, the House must pass without amendment the version of the healthcare bill approved by the Senate at Christmas in order to get around the possibility of a GOP filibuster. If the Senate bill is amended in the House it would have to go back to the Senate once again, where it would be "dead on arrival" because Reid is now one vote short of the 60 he needs to bring it to the floor.

To get around this problem, congressional Democrats have been working on a strategy involving the reconciliation process where the changes demanded by wavering Democrats necessary to winning their votes for the Senate version of the healthcare bill would be worked out in reconciliation, a parliamentary maneuver typically used to address budget and spending issues that cannot be stopped with the filibuster.

The GOP letter makes its combined objection to the strategy clear.

"To endeavor to ensure that the reconciliation process is not used to fast-track an unpopular bill through Congress," the 41 Republicans wrote Reid, "we wish to inform you that we will oppose efforts to waive the so-called Byrd Rule during Senate consideration of any reconciliation bill concerning health reform."

The "Byrd Rule" was created by former Senate Democratic Leader Robert Byrd as a way of ensuring that reconciliation bills--which are not subject to the filibuster--are not used to enact policy changes that are not primarily and specifically related to the federal budget.

"As it takes 60 votes to waive the Byrd Rule," the Republicans wrote, "we can ensure that any provision that trips the Byrd Rule will be stripped from the bill, which will require that the bill be sent back to the House for further consideration and additional votes."

Using the Byrd Rule to strip out the needed legislative fixes--like new compromise language on abortion--that House Democrats will need to pass the larger bill is a superior bit of strategy, the kind the GOP is often thought incapable of developing. The GOP may have found a way to check the Democrats in their race to get healthcare done before the end of the current Congress.

Tags:
healthcare reform,
Congress,
healthcare,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Gee, the Republicans must be uber-scared by the possibility that, after 30 years of fighting for the American people & the US economy on long overdue health care reform, Democrats are very close to pulling off victory...don't Republicans have any work to do on behalf of their districts & constituents, or do they just spend all day playing political games and throwing slimy accusations and threats at Democrats re health reform.One wonders.

Here is Senator Byrd's response to the Daily Mail, W.Va, when he was misrepresented as being against the use of budget reconciliation for the current health reform bill. He supports use of the procedure for this bill and, since I believe he wrote the law, his opinion should carry weight.

Thursday March 4, 2010

Reconciliation can be used to find savings

Advertiser

It has been said that a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. In the Daily Mail's March 2 editorial regarding health care reform legislation, "Using reconciliation would hurt Democrats: Choking off debate is no way to muscle through health legislation," the newspaper's misunderstanding of congressional procedures misinforms readers who, in rapidly increasing numbers, find themselves unable to obtain or afford medical insurance.

The editorial correctly quoted me as saying in the spring of 2009 that using reconciliation to enact a huge health care package would "violate the intent and spirit of the budget process . . .".

I believed then, as now, that the Senate should debate the health reform bill under regular rules, which it did. The result of that debate was the passing of a comprehensive health care reform bill in the Senate by a 60-vote supermajority.

I continue to support the budget reconciliation process for deficit reduction. The entire Senate- or House- passed health care bill could not and would not pass muster under the current reconciliation rules, which were established under my watch.

Yet a bill structured to reduce deficits by, for example, finding savings in Medicare or lowering health care costs, may be consistent with the Budget Act, and appropriately considered under reconciliation.

With all due respect, the Daily Mail's hyperbole about "imposing government control," acts of "disrespect to the American people" and "corruption" of Senate procedures resembles more the barkings from the nether regions of Glennbeckistan than the "sober and second thought" of one of West Virginia's oldest and most respected daily newspapers.

My commitment to protecting the best interests of all West Virginians and the American people remains as firm and consistent as my devotion to observing the necessary and essential Senate rules and procedures intended to guarantee debate and the airing of diverse views.

Robert C. Byrd

Washington, D.C.

Byrd is the senior U.S senator from West Virgini

Arabella of NY 11:34PM March 17, 2010

A very good link with the Dollars and cents...

http://www.taxcutsincreaserevenue.com/

Bill Hedges of MO 8:47PM March 11, 2010

Bush tax cuts increased government revenue from rich:

"Two of the most oft-cited objections to the Bush tax cuts by the left are that it helped only the rich and it was largely responsible for the federal deficit at the end of the Bush presidency. Instead, it is true that if the current administration allows any or all of the Bush tax cuts to expire, economic growth will be slowed and tax revenue could actually decrease, perpetuating our deficit dilemma."

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/lying_about_bushs_tax_cuts.html

Historic proof cutting taxes increases taxes paid by rich:

http://www.heritage.org/research/taxes/wm327.cfm

Bill Hedges of MO 8:36PM March 11, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement