Detroit Mayor’s Surrender Shows the Failure of Liberalism

February 25, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (20)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Back before he was president, Ronald Reagan used to joke that the Johnson administration had declared war on poverty and that "poverty won." Indeed, the American landscape is riddled with examples of how the liberal welfare state has continually failed to achieve the improvements in living standards and quality of life its political sponsors promised it would bring.

In certain places, the overreach of the welfare state and the way it has suppressed entrepreneurial initiative has led to the near collapse of governing institutions, the latest example being the long-oppressed city of Detroit, where Mayor Dave Bing has announced a plan to "shrink" the city.

According to the Detroit News, Bing plans to relocate residents from distressed and desolate parts of the city into areas that can support viable neighborhoods. "If we don't do it, you know this whole city is going to go down. I'm hopeful people will understand that," Bing said, adding, "If they stay where they are, I absolutely cannot give them all the services they require."

"You can't support every neighborhood," Bing told radio station WJR's Frank Beckmann. "You can't support every community across this city. Those communities that are stable, we can't allow them to go down the tubes. That's not a good business decision from my vantage point."

There are those who will no doubt argue that such efforts have been tried before but under different names, like urban renewal, when slums were bulldozed in favor of giant public housing projects, an idea that has since be abandoned. But at no time that I can remember has a city government simply given up, raised the white flag and abandoned whole neighborhoods--while potentially forcing people to move.

Those who think the government actually can run the healthcare system better than the private sector would do well to study the example of Detroit, which the mayor argues must now ration government services on the basis of local geography and demographics--and at the expense of the liberty of the people who still live there.

Bing's relocation initiative is a remarkable admission of failure, not just of his administration but of decades of Democratic rule in the city once known proudly as "Motown," a failure of central planning and state-based renewal efforts that deserves national attention.

Tags:
Detroit

Reader Comments Read all comments (20)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Lifelong Detroiter here, (City, not Suburbs) a few things that are crucial to understanding what is actually happening here. First these "neighborhoods" are vast empty expanses where MAYBE 3 or 4 dilapidated houses still stand. Why would you continue to fund FULL city services to areas that bear more semblance to farmland/prairie? If you have a gangrenous leg do you keep it in hopes it "Gets better" or "returns to normal" NO... You amputate the leg, to save the body. My neighborhood (Warrendale) is typical of Detroit (not one of the ones you see on T.V.) working class houses, neatly manicured lawns, actual grocery stores, racial integration, and Good Schools. Police response time SUCKS, other city services follow the same metric. By cutting off farmland from Detroit (and therefore allowing emergency services to become Wayne Counties problem) response times in my neighborhood WILL improve, Hell my property taxes might even be adjusted to a more realistic level! Cutting off deserted, "diseased" portions of Detroit, Neighborhoods like mine might be spared, and more importantly Detroit can move on. Naysayers should bite their tongues, this situation could happen anywhere there are manufacturing jobs. This is NOT a surrender, a failure, or poorly thought out knee-jerk reaction. This is Detroit Taking two steps forward, without the usual 3 steps back.

@MP of WI... Communism, and Socialism are different, drastically. Communism was a failure in the Soviet Union because of poor egocentric leadership, is the People Rep. of China a failure? No. Sweeden? No. Canada? No. I'm sorry your head is buried in the sand, but do your homework before you start glib talking on a subject you obviously do not understand.

Bradley J. Greene of MI 4:57PM December 07, 2010

What types of Liberal Democratic policies were to blame? Welfare? Smart Growth? High Density Development? Endless government programs? The usual Democratic Social engineering attempts at creating a utopia? I am concerned because they have a habit of trying to repeat the same mistake in other cities.

Michael LaPlante of MN 1:29AM May 15, 2010

Nice to see all cons including the scumbag author of this article, are all clueless and dumb.

All fox viewers I bet !

idiots

GOPdestroyingthisnation of FL 8:13PM May 14, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement