Republicans Should Beware Televised Healthcare Negotiations

February 8, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (21)

It may be that the Republicans are on the verge of showing President Barack Obama a way out of the healthcare mess he has made for himself.

Up until the election of Republican Scott Brown to a seat in the United States Senate, the Democrats on Capitol Hill had largely been negotiating with themselves over what the final version of the healthcare bill would look like. They had the votes to pass it without the GOP but they didn't have the will--so the legislation was left to linger while the president talked tough about not running away from it.

All that changed after Obama, who was back to calling it "health insurance reform"--a phrase which polls better than healthcare reform--turned in a better than expected performance during the question and answer session that followed his remarks to the House Republicans, meeting in Baltimore.

The televised session had Obama, it should not come as a surprise, holding up rather well against the nearly dozen members of the GOP selected to ask questions. Politically, however, it is as though lightning struck, pointing out the way forward to members of the White House staff looking to save the president's signature issue.

In a brief interview televised right before Super Bowl XLIV, Obama announced he would be calling Democrats and Republicans together for a meeting on healthcare reform, a meeting that would be televised.

"I want to come back [after the upcoming congressional recess] and have a large meeting--Republicans and Democrats--to go through, systematically, all the best ideas that are out there and move it forward," Obama said Sunday in an interview with CBS news anchor Katie Couric.

"While (Obama's) been very clear that he supports the House and Senate bills, if Republicans or anyone else has a plan for protecting Americans from insurance company abuses, lowering costs, reducing prescription drug prices for seniors, making coverage more secure, and offering affordable options to those without coverage, he's anxious to see it and debate the merits of it," Politico quoted a White House official --sounding like the spider inviting the fly into the parlor--as saying.

This is the kind of thing Obama does extremely well. And it will no doubt be structured to make him appear as the moderating influence, scolding and cajoling the Democrats and Republicans in the House and Senate to work together for the sake of the country. It will put him in the middle of the discussion in the best sense of term while committing him to do nothing different than he has done thus far. In a setting such as this the Republicans, who have kept the focus on the Democrats thus far, run the risk of making themselves the issue. 

Tags:
health care,
health care reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (21)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It's pretty clear to me that the Dems, though they understand that malpractice reform and tax breaks to buy insurance isn't going to solve a complex health problem in the U.S., seem to be pretty lousy at selling it to the public. Perhaps it is because we know that the government isn't the best at simplifying anything. Really, how many people do you know head to the DMV or the Social Security office convinced that they'll be in an out in ten minutes. Nobody. You walk into a private business and wait more than fifteen minutes without help, that place will go out of business pretty quickly.

That being said, the Republicans are taking far too much credit in beating back a bill that the rest of us already knew would likely do little to solve increasing medical costs. We have an increasing elderly population and an increasingly unhealthy working public. Perhaps the insanely high cost of insurance will motivate people to eat healthier and exercise more. (I know it is a motivator for me).

The Republicans are more interested in getting back power than being part of a solution. Democrats went through the same strategy during the Bush years. Yet stuff doesn't change. People likely agree with the Tea Party movement on smaller government, but independents aren't going to get on the Obama is Muslim-Socialist-Kenyan bandwagon. The GOP needs to tread carefully, because as the Dems are showing right now, too much of one party is overkill.

Mia of WI 4:45PM February 18, 2010

Is this really where we are now!? That anytime Pubs and Dems are asked to speak in a public forum where they're forced to out their opinions for everyone to hear, it's considered a trap?

If the Republicans have a way out of this, then stand your self-serving, lazy butt up, open your cake hole and let intelligence spill out instead of rhetoric and immense loads of the opposite view, whatever that is THIS afternoon. Be EXCITED to stand up and let your GRAND ideas be heard. Right!?

Between the Democrats inability to grow a set and the Republicans acting like a bunch of spoiled brats in junior high who didn't make the cheerleading squad...I don't get it anymore.

If Republicans are scared to stand up and speak in the same room as the President because they're afraid he may OUTDO them? Are you KIDDING ME!? Sit down and shut up already.

Out problem isn't freakin' Socialism. It isn't big government. And it isn't that the President's middle name is HUSSEIN. It's because we have allowed Republican/Democrat to stand in the way of EVERYTHING it means to be America. I want somebody to stand up and do their god-forsaken job without pinning his/her failures on the other side. I am so DAMN TIRED of this BS!!

The self-serving article you just read is why this country is going to get EXACTLY what this behavior deserves. Don't be shocked when our stupidity becomes our undoing.

Unbelievable.

Guy Dye of IA 11:25AM February 17, 2010

Can anyone write or spell properly? You cannot expect anyone to take your opinions seriously when you are unable to express them in an educated manner. This is very typical of both extremes. Liberals and Conservatives need to get off of their soap boxes and pick up a book every once and a while. Learn from history, and you will likely be surprised by the degree at which your true opinions deviate from those that you’ve unwittingly adopted and regurgitated.

.

Jess of WA 3:09AM February 16, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement