Health Reform Drags Obama's Poll Ratings Down

January 12, 2010 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Support for President Barack Obama continues to decline, fueled in no small measure by an increase in the public's dissatisfaction over the progress of healthcare reform.

A poll released Tuesday by CBS News shows the decline to be continual, with 54 percent of the more than 1,200 adults surveyed saying they disapproved of the way in which Obama was handling healthcare. With only 36 percent now indicating their approval, those responding to the latest poll were 11 percent more dissatisfied with the president than they were in October of last year and 6 percent more dissatisfied than they were in December, when the poll was last conducted.

The marks given to Congress are even worse, with 57 percent of those surveyed registering thumbs down to the way the Democrats are handling the issue and 61 percent saying they disapproved of the Republicans' conduct on healthcare.

Of particular importance, from a political standpoint, is that the CBS poll fails to demonstrate that there is anything approaching a consensus that Obama and Congress are on the right track. "Only about one in five Americans thinks the reforms strike the right balance when it comes to expanding coverage, controlling costs and regulating insurance companies," the poll shows while the public remains divided "on whether the reforms go too far or not far enough in providing health coverage to as many Americans as possible."

It's an odd turn of events for something that was the Democrats' signature issue during the 2008 presidential campaign. Survey after survey led politicians in both parties to conclude that healthcare reform was something the American people were demanding but, as has been the case before, they clearly do not like what they are being offered.

Partly, the process is to blame. Rather than focus on maintaining, even improving, the quality of care available in the United States, the White House and the Democrats who control Congress have labored to produce a hodgepodge of reforms that threaten the continued existence of the system as we know it while providing little in the way of guarantees that the parts of the current system people like will not be adversely affected by the proposed reforms.

This last piece likely explains why so much of the healthcare negotiation has been conducted in secret and behind closed doors. Rather than wave the victory flag, the White House, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi are all behaving like, when it comes to healthcare, they have something to hide. Which no doubt explains why the public's support for reform is dropping like a stone. They will not buy what they cannot see.

Tags:
healthcare reform,
Barack Obama,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Not many Americans understand the provisions of the current health reform bills that are currently being reconciled, so it is hard to take any polls seriously. To prove this, ask your friends, fammily and neighbors these few questions...

What is the concept of a Health Insurance Exchange and who would be eligible to use it?

What provisions are in the bills to incentivize large employers to continue to offer private group health plans to their employees? What qualifies as a large employer?

What provisions are in the bills to give small businesses assistance in providing private group health plans to their employees? What is SHOP?

What are cost-sharing subsidies and premium tax credits, and who would qualify for them?

What are non-profit Co-Ops and how would they play into the landscape of plans available in the Exchange?

What are the tiers of plans that would be available on the Exchange and how would their premiums and levels of benefits be determined?

What are the regulations that would be placed on the private insurers in terms of pre-existing conditions? What are Medical Loss Ratios?

What are the plans for financing reform? How much of the financing comes from changes to the income tax code for individuals? How much comes from taxing big pharma, medical device manufacturers and private insurance companies?

I bet that almost all of your friends and family would fail a test asking these questions. Who's fault is that? Well, I think that the The Congress and White House have done a horrible job at explaining what has been proposed, and has left it all up to the talking-heads, editorial writers, and bloggers. This has led to an enormous amount supposition, assumption and outright hysteria, all of which could have been avoided by just having some synopses of the bills published to public websites, so that people could take a look at the facts and figures. Then all they needed to do is get the word out to their constituents to let us know that we could read this stuff and form our own opinions based on the facts, instead of having to be informed through the filters of the media.

If you want to be informed yourself, take a look at this synopsis from the non-profit foundation, Kaiser Family Foundation. This is factual and is updated as things change:

http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/housesenatebill_final.pdf

Let's get the word out so people can make informed decisions based on facts. Then, once people actually have a clue about what is in the bills, we can take the polls seriously.

E Warren of GA 4:14PM January 16, 2010

Lyle Sir,

I am sorry to say that you do not understand health care reform, nor can you pretend to understand the current reforms because half, if not more, of the legislators voting on this bill have not even read it. In fact most of it has been done behind closed doors as you already know yet ignore. You are mistaken to have insulted James D when when you say his news sources are skewed. You are correct when you say health care is not completely free to everyone, but on the other hand it will be free to many more than under the current system, a system which is already unsustainable and deleterious to our ability to maintain a proper budget as states and a nation. Tell me though who is the one with a crooked "agenda" as you imply; is it those who are trying to pass a bill behind closed doors, or a person who comes out on national television and says what he feels is right, according to his and most Americans view of the constitution? The founding fathers also had an agenda, and you might do well to question the agenda in which you have placed your trust.

Sammy of UT 6:47PM January 15, 2010

There are many issues with the HC system, however, it was the government that created the problem in the first place with Medicare and State Medicaid. The real problem is with the Providers who've been cost-shifting because of the low rates paid by the government. The Providers tack those lost revenues onto the private insurance sector. This has NOTHING to do with insurance companies. It's the Providers and the government that drive the rising costs of HC and so it forces the private insurance to raise premiums to compensate. Insurance companies do not make that much (2-3% margin) as this crooked WH administration and the Democrats would have you believe. They are lying and using insurance as a scape goat to gain popular support from the nation and they are flat out wrong, but most bought into it hook, line and sinker. While *some* insurance companies may be guilty of recinding coverage or denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions, well think about this: Insurance companies have obligations to their members to ensure that they can cover their claims when they get treatment. If insurance companies just took anyone for any reason then what happens when all these very sick people with cancers, tumors, heart conditions, etc, just come onboard to the plan? Well, they're going to cost hundreds of millions to the company that potentially deprives the millions of other people for just those small handful of people. It would be reckless and irresponsible for them to just take anybody in when they know they're going to potentially bankrupt the company or impact everyone else's care/benefits. Just like the WH and congress are being reckless and irresponsible now in jeopardizing nearly 300 million people's coverage/lives for what- 10-20 million? That doesn't make sense and nor does this current HC legislation that is going to drive HC costs/premiums even higher and ultimately bankrupt this country. And it's funny how they say that it's wrong to charge sicker people more in premiums... Think about it like this: You go to get auto insurance and you have multiple accidents, tickets and a DUI... Do you somehow think that you're going to get the same rate as the perfect driver of 25 years that has never had a ticket, accident or DUI? It's all about RISK. Life insurance/actuarials work exactly the same: You smoke, you're overweight, you have high blood pressure and diabetes and you're 50 years old so do you think that you're going to pay the same as a perfectly healthy non-smoker age 25? Health Care is NOT a right. It is a privilege for those that work for it. It should be made affordable to all, however, that will never happen with any government meddling because they created the mess in the first place and will only make it worse. At any rate, first drive down the COST of HC and then look at larger legislation to help the uninsured; otherwise, you'll be dumping tens of million into a broke system that will go over budget in the first year.

SS of IL 9:50AM January 15, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement