Catholic Bishops Weigh in Against Abortion Compromise in Health Reform Bill

December 18, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (30)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Last-minute efforts to craft a compromise acceptable to Senate healthcare holdout Ben Nelson of Nebraska on the issue of abortion were dealt a blow late Friday when the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops weighed in against it. Daniel DiNardo, the archbishop of Galveston-Houston, Texas, and chairman of the conference's Committee on Pro-Life Activities, said in a statement that the proposed compromise being pushed by Pennsylvania Democratic Sen. Bob Casey was insufficient to fix the problems in the healthcare legislation currently being debated in the U.S. Senate. The current bill, DiNardo said, would continue to be "morally unacceptable unless and until it complies with longstanding current laws on abortion funding such as the Hyde Amendment."

"Senator Casey's good-faith effort to allow individuals to 'opt out' of abortion coverage actually underscores how radically the underlying Senate bill would change abortion policy. Excluding elective abortions from overall health plans is not a privilege that individuals should have to seek as the exception to the norm. In all other federal health programs, excluding abortion coverage is the norm. And numerous opinion polls show that the great majority of Americans do not want abortion coverage," DiNardo said.

Casey's effort to improve the bill, the Catholic clergyman continued, "do not change the fundamental problem with the Senate bill: Despite repeated claims to the contrary, it does not comply with longstanding Hyde restrictions on federal funding of elective abortions and health plans that include them." DiNardo urged the Senate to include language in the bill that would block federal funds from going to elective abortions and promised continued opposition to the legislation until their concerns were addressed.

Tags:
abortion,
religion,
healthcare,
Catholic Church,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (30)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This amendment may give them what they want making even D&C's which are not sinful by canon law not covered. And yet they still aren't happy. They wont be happy until Vatican II is completely reversed and we go back to the 40s.

The sad thing is they had a chance to have everyone treated. And reduce the burden on families thus reducing abortion and treating the sick. They chose not to. They could have had the child born with 2 chambers of a heart covered. The sad thing is 70 years ago the Church would have been in favor of universal health care. How far it has fallen with its blinders on.

Truly I tell you they have received their reward.

neo of MN 12:32PM December 22, 2009

Yes, the Vatican has its agents firmly planted in the GOP. They're successful partly because they conned people of other faiths into being "ecumenical" & supporting Catholic policies of banning abortion & suicide. The Catholic Church has long been the biggest church, with the most buildings, schools & assets. It tells all priests to convert every person in the world. I re-read Goldwater's "Freedom is My Flight Plan." He repeatedly mentions the importance of God. As a "Jew" he ecumenically turned the GOP toward Christianity. His brother Bob represented Christianity. Both parties have too many Ban-Abortionists & there are far too many Prolifers in Congress & courts. Taxes are higher because so many religious poor women refuse to abort because their church says it's a sin. When the dad walks out, the poor unwed mom puts herself & baby on welfare, ADC, food stamps, health care & subsidized housing. If she wants another kid by a deadbeat dad, she goes ahead & adds the next one to the burden on us taxpayers. If we had taxpaid abortion, each one would cost less than $4000 but would save us taxpayers from being stuck with providing $500,000 over l8 years of the welfare kid's life and that of its mom.

auradawn veirs of CA 8:43PM December 21, 2009

You can't have your cake and eat it too, USCCB. You backed this marxist monster in the presidential election because he told you he wanted common ground. How's that hope and change working out for the unborn and elderly. Over HALF of all Catholics voted for this marxist because Catholic leadership told them it was okay. You guys clapped, and smiled, and fawned all over this Marxist at the most prestigious Catholic University in the country, Notre Dame. You, and a great deal of our Catholic leadership have betrayed the Catholic faithful because of your mistakes, and we are not about to trust you anytime soon. Get your idealistic heads out of your buts, and help capitalists and the free market get our country out of this huge and dangerous mess YOU helped get it into. This is COMMUNISM, not freedom - to anybody who is not a progressive: get your heads out of the sand, we're fighting for our very freedom!

Donna of TX 6:11PM December 21, 2009

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement