Plummeting Polls Show the Cost of Obama’s Afghanistan Dithering

December 1, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

After dithering for many months, President Barack Obama has finally decided on a course of action for Afghanistan. The new plan, to be announced Tuesday during a speech at the United States Military Academy at West Point, may be costly—but not perhaps as costly as the months of indecision have been.

According to the latest Gallup Poll, Americans are increasingly disappointed in the president's handling of events in Afghanistan. Only 35 percent say they approve of the way he is handling things there, down from 49 percent in September and 56 percent in July, an overall decline of 21 points in just four months.

The decline, which Gallup says is in double-digits across all party groups, represents the leading edge of an overall drop in support for the president and his policies since coming into office in January 2009. Moreover, the new Afghan policy, while not quite a half-measure, will likely do little to win him friends on either side of the aisle.

Among Republicans there is a sense that Obama may be sending fewer troops than are needed into a hostile environment. And, by clearly enunciating the exit strategy, the president is being reckless with the troops because he is unwilling to ignore domestic political considerations.

For Democrats, says Gallup, "a slim majority of Obama's fellow Democrats approve of his handling of the issue" but that the idea of sending additional troops anywhere, especially into this particular war zone, is unsettling. They remember, many of them do anyway, the way in which Lyndon Johnson's emersion of the U.S. military in South Vietnam derailed the promise of LBJ's presidency.

This likely explains how and why prominent Democrats like Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John F. Kerry and obscure backbenchers like New York Democratic Rep. Maurice Hinchey had surfaced to blame the problems in Afghanistan once again on George W. Bush.

By shifting the blame away from the current president to the previous one they are trying to buy him some political cover. It's a strategy that worked on the economy, one they now hope will help cushion the bad news that may be on the way.

The American people, who have been more forgiving of Obama's missteps and misstatements since coming into office, will likely hold him to a higher standard of accountability where Afghanistan is concerned, since his actions from this point forward are the product of such a publicly deliberative process.

Tags:
Gallup,
Barack Obama,
War in Afghanistan (2001-)

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Roff and Cheney just demonstrate a miserable similarity in their profuse Anti-American attitude. Because the people don't go along with their narrow sleazy demented view that chickenhawks should be dictate government, that the public doesn't need to to know or understand what is best for them. Ignorance is bliss for manipulators, not their victims when they find out they've been had.

Sorry state of the country with shenanigans like this.

Hank of TN 11:03PM December 09, 2009

Nothing new. Typical teleprompter lint to lolipop conversion.

Felt sorry for the 4,000 cadets who had to listen to the boring Commander in Retreat who used them as a photo op prop!

One of Obummer's worst speeches thus far.

Training mission that will take 24-36 months and he is sending troops over that will, maybe, be on the ground 12 months before he withdraws them in 2011 in advance of his re-election bid. It is all about polotics and his ego, not at all about America.

Ken of WI 1:28PM December 03, 2009

Winning a war requires our military to do all it can do. That means devastation and overpowering the enemy with force.We could have won Vietnam, Korea and this war with force.Asking our military to only shoot at a clear target or avoid the so called innocent is not war it's sitting ducks for our troops. We leveled Japan we could level Afghanistan. With this leadership and the politically correct liberal we will only be losing troops as in the other wars and there will be again no victory. We didn't start this war, they did with 9-11. We owe it to our citizens and our troops to come out as winners no matter what the consequences are to the enemy. We can no longer allow liberals to dictate the strategy as they are the weak and the first to run to the hills. We must use our superior force and it will provide victory and that force will prevent another 9-11. 1-nuke and everyone will learn what we can really be,the superior power! And all the sympathizers here who cry peace should be the targets in Afghanistan not our brave troops. But we have another major problem and that is Obama, he is not a qualified commander in chief and it shows!

True American who loves their country, but not it's leader of NY 11:21PM December 02, 2009

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement