House Republicans Tar Moderate Democrats With Liberal Healthcare Votes

November 19, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Showing new signs of life after the embarrassing debacle in New York's 23rd Congressional District, U.S. Rep. Pete Sessions and the National Republican Congressional Committee are already pounding some senior Democrats whose vote in favor of Nancy Pelosi's healthcare package may make then vulnerable at the next election.

In new ads designed to run in North Dakota, Arkansas and South Carolina, the committee is raising the issue of the votes Democrats Earl Pomeroy, Vic Snyder and John Spratt cast in favor of Pelosicare by using the words of fellow Democrats who voted against it:

"The worst things we could do during a recession is raise taxes - and this bill does just that." —Rep. Dan Boren, Democrat of Oklahoma

"... this big of a price tag in today's economic climate... " —Rep. Travis Childers, Democrat of Mississippi

"... there is too much new spending in this bill..." —Rep. Chet Edwards, Democrat of Texas

"... this bill will not reduce long-term costs." —Rep Bobby Bright, Democrat of Alabama

"Democrats are getting a taste of what next fall is going to feel like when they are going down to defeat thanks in part to the statements made by their liberal colleagues," NRCC spokesman Ken Spain said.

As a strategy, this is not so much about pitting Democrats in Congress against their colleagues as it is to drive a wedge between moderate Democrats and independent voters in key districts. The NRCC is, in effect, trying to make the moderates "own" the liberal agenda being pushed by Pelosi and the House leadership. It's worked before, as political scientists Merle and Earl Black document in their book The Rise of Southern Republicans. By linking moderate Democrats in suburban districts to the Democrats national—and liberal—agenda the NRCC hopes to nationalize the election—which is how the GOP built its last Congressional majority.

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You're not fooling me! You're really Sarah Palin aren't you? I can tell by the rambling incoherent comment!

Jaja of TX 5:35PM November 23, 2009

I am a prophet. Proven already that persons that speak out. Are targeted. Local gangs are so quick, liars-church goers. Indianpolis fed and or cia crooked or not funded. Or quick tech hog tactic? Moralist be a fed police officer in south IN. I am prolife christian republican.I aint conformed! campiagn compassionate prolife moralist republicans and prolife democrats for good officers. Think and change! watchout for tricksters and mean husbands that do not arm their wives And bully so called friends and room number givers! Thank you. Col 3:11. kjv. 1 corinth 14:26. psa99:9-outside pray. Faith in holiness choices.

andy tucker Jesus of IN 7:17PM November 21, 2009

What?!!! Marxist and Fascist are at opposite ends of the political spectrum and it's impossible to be both? Shut up! Stop confusing me with your logic!!! Thank God that America is safe now that Saddam is dead!!!

jaja of TX 3:26PM November 20, 2009

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement