Government Should Stay Out of Media, Let the Press Fend for Itself

October 20, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

Writing in Monday's Washington Post, former executive editor Len Downie and Columbia University Professor Michael Schudson offer a menu of options to save print journalism by creating mechanisms to bring "public sources of support" for news reporting.

Saying that "American society must now take some collective responsibility for supporting news reporting," Downie and Schudson argue that government must take a leadership role and subsidize the news gathering process because "What is paramount is preserving independent, original, credible reporting, whether or not it is profitable, and regardless of the medium in which is appears."

Among their recommendations is for the Internal Revenue Service or Congress to "clarify tax regulations to explicitly allow new or existing local news organizations to operate as nonprofit or low-profit entities, allowing them to receive tax-deductible donations, along with advertising revenue and other income." Also, they want the Federal Communications Commission to create a "national Fund for Local News" out of the fees it collects "from or could impose on telecom users, broadcast licensees or Internet service providers." The money from this fund, Downie and Schudson suggest, would be distributed in competitive grants issued by "independent state Local News Fund Councils to local news organizations for innovations in local news reporting and ways to support it."

Both of these are monumentally bad ideas, in no small part because they make the government and media partners in the news business.

The spirit of American journalism is anchored in the idea of a free press, one that is constitutionally protected from government interference by the First Amendment. Adjusting the tax code or using government money to keep struggling news chains in business would have a chilling effect on the news business because, unlike what Downie and Schudson seem to be saying in their piece, it always has strings attached.

As real world newspapers and news magazines are experiencing a decline and being forced to reinvent themselves, the nation is seeing an explosion of Internet-based news reporting, some of which is very, very good. Rather than run to the government for high-minded handouts, news business decision makers ought to be reassessing their product and making the changes necessary to keep their customers.

Tags:
journalism,
media

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

mg the pain New is may buy,

Akmzocup of CO 6:09AM November 16, 2009

neverantagonist Information in nervous in,

Dhkwegij of CO 6:09AM November 16, 2009

central cellulose site's the on our is check for be ethanol,

Khqbmsgj of CO 6:09AM November 16, 2009

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement