Democrats’ House-Senate Public Option Impasse Could Kill Healthcare Reform

September 30, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

It's too soon to tell but September 29, 2009, just may be the day that healthcare reform died.

On a bi-partisan basis the Senate Finance Committee rejected Tuesday two amendments, one by West Virginia Democratic Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV, and a more modest proposal by Sen. Chuck Schumer, a Democrat from New York, to add the so-called "public option" to the healthcare reform legislation currently being written.

Congressional cynics are already describing the votes as "fig leaves," intended to give vulnerable Democrats a "No" vote on the unpopular public option they can point to during their re-election campaigns. And they further predict that, regardless of whatever the Finance Committee produces, the legislation the Senate will finally vote on will either include some type of public option or will lay the groundwork for one in the future.

Taking the members of the committee at their word, or at least at their votes, means the public campaign against public option has had the desired effect—as least as far as the Senate is concerned—setting up a direct conflict with the House of Representatives.

Back even before the August recess began the pressure to drop the public option got so strong that its strongest supporters—more that 60 members of the House Democratic Caucus—signaled to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that they would not vote in favor of any healthcare reform package that did not include it. Meanwhile, a smaller group of Democrats in the House seem to be saying they won't vote for any healthcare reform that includes public option.

It's not at all clear that the Democrats opposed to public option can muster enough votes, along with the Republicans, to bring down the bill. The Democrats who support public option, by withholding their votes from any plan that in their eyes doesn't go far enough, can.

With the House unable to pass anything without public option and the Senate looking like it can't pass anything with it, the Democrats and President Obama seem to be headed to a point where they are frozen in place, staring at each other like Dr. Seuss' north- and south-going Zax, with neither willing to move aside so the other can proceed.

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Some people can teach themselves meters. Like 3 level to 7 level. A politician could think what if i was in that position. Usually some hateful and or spoiled person yells at political meetings. I do not want to be a police officer. Also i am scared of walking cause i am so outspoken and abuse in past. Dreams in East MO. I do not own a working vehicle. I live Not a big city so no unstressfuls job. Give tax breaks to employers for working with the slow! Some do not know it is terrfying to work with quick and mean! So slow to apply at jobsites.Mark business windows. Encourage to fed gov. to use street security cameras were there is high rate of kidnappings!Thank you. Psa99:9-outside pray.Col 3:11. Rev 12:9. Blame the devil not Great Lord God. Fire the corrupt. Warn victims and prosecute!

andy tucker of IN 10:11PM October 03, 2009

The healthcare business has paid a lot of money over the years to prevent this. Many of those, many Democrats, who got benefits which includes stock won't bite the hand that feeds them. The fix is in.

Tommy of IN 8:46PM October 02, 2009

In 1993 disloyal democrats got away with betraying us because they suffered no consequences for their treachery.

We spent 700 million to elect Obama and a super majority on a platform that includes the public option.

The focus on Republicans only let's the traitors in our midst get away with another 1993. These people don't care what is happening to our Party as a result of what they are doing. The only way to bring them in line that has not been tried is to publicly shame them.

Join our campaign to enforce party discipline at http://forprogress.org/healthcare

BRING ON THE FILIBUSTER!

It will expose the traitors and bring the wrath of the 65% that wants the option to buy into Medicare on them. The misuse of the filibuster by disloyal democrats must end, if we are to pass the platform we promised the American people.

edwin forprogress.org of FL 12:55PM October 02, 2009

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement