Score One for Sarah Palin on the Healthcare Reform Death Panels

August 13, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

In what can fairly be described as an admission that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin knew what she was talking about, the Senate Finance Committee Thursday dropped language from its bipartisan healthcare reform package that Palin and others had suggested would eventually lead to mandated end-of-life counseling sessions for seniors.

Supporters of Obamacare, including President Barack Obama, had accused Palin and others of being dishonest in suggesting the counseling sessions would somehow lead to the government encouraging euthanasia as a cost-cutting measure as part of rationed care.

"The rumor that's been circulating a lot lately is this idea that somehow the House of Representatives voted for death panels that will basically pull the plug on grandma because we've decided that we don't, it's too expensive to let her live anymore," Obama said recently.

"It turns out that I guess this arose out of a provision in one of the House bills that allowed Medicare to reimburse people for consultations about end-of-life care, setting up living wills, the availability of hospice, etc.," he said, adding, "The intention of the members of Congress was to give people more information so that they could handle issues of end-of-life care when they're ready on their own terms. It wasn't forcing anybody to do anything."

The move to drop the end-of-life counseling provisions, as reported by The Hill, suggests otherwise.

"We are working very hard to avoid unintended consequences by methodically working through the complexities of all of these issues and policy options," Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said in a statement. "We dropped end-of-life provisions from consideration entirely because of the way they could be misinterpreted and implemented incorrectly."

Grassley said the end-of-life provision in the versions of the healthcare reform bill under consideration in the House would pay physicians to "advise patients about end-of-life care and rate physician quality of care based on the creation of and adherence to orders for end-of-life care."

"Maybe others can defend a bill like the Pelosi bill that leaves major issues open to interpretation, but I can't," Grassley added.

Score one for Sarah Palin.

Tags:
healthcare reform,
Sarah Palin,
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (158)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Note: The 2 organizations Roff is associated with - Institute for Liberty, and Let Freedom Ring - are very partisan right wing organizations, certainly not non-partisan as Roff's blurb suggests. The names alone suggest as much, but the websites nail it. I stopped wearing 3-cornered hats when I was a kid. When are you going to grow up, Roff?

Institute for Liberty

"An advocacy organization dedicated to combating the petty-tyrannies of government, especially the impact of an ever-expanding regulatory state on small..."

"Let Freedom Ring is a non-profit, grassroots organization supporting the Conservative agenda and countering the efforts of 527 organizations like MoveOn.org"

swatter of DC 9:39PM July 19, 2010

I may have commented on this before, but ran across it again now. I haven't read USNWR recently, and I guess this suggests I haven't missed much.

I read that part of the bill; the authors did not, or, are liars like Palin, Boehner, and all the republicans running for cover and angling for advantage. All it does is allow medicare to pay for an end of life discussion every 5 years for those over whatever age to help them plan while they still can in order to avoid Terri Schiavo scenarios and bringing in the lawyers - this should have made conservatives happy! Having this discussion with patients is one of many quality factors in rating doctors. Nothing is mandatory about it, there are no preconceived outcomes suggested. Bottom line: there is no way to mis-interpret the bill that way, except for an intentional misinterpretation. That Palin directed a day to be Healthcare decisions day in 2008 in Alaska, as posted before, makes it even more absurd.

The alternative: medicare doesn't pay for this discussion - patients either pay out of pocket or some may not have this discussion, which sometimes will end up with patients unable to make their own decisions and in come the lawyers.

As for it being taken out, a) hardly an admission that Palin was right - more an admission that it wasn't very important in the whole scheme of things and that there were too many paranoid idiots out there like the authors of this article who would not be convinced by actual evidence because they were unwilling to listen or think; b) the passed bill still has this in it, so a BIG RASPBERRY to the authors.

swatter of DC 9:32PM July 19, 2010

Sarah Palin really is a lady that is self-centered and needs to think about allot more than just herself and her failing career. People are amazed at the popularity of a hated woman, who is only out to make a buck. Take health care from her family for one year and have them deal with the limited public health clinics; which only if there is a opening and see how quick she jumps on the band wagon for health care. Those who have never consider those who do not have. Palin get a reality of real life. We once asked her to help us with the homeless and she deleted us from face book. What a winner she is, she needs 24/7 prayer.

Sarah Palin Unveils Target List for Midterm Elections

Noran of CA 8:28PM March 23, 2010

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement