Burden of Big Government Taxes and Regulation Skyrockets in 2009

August 13, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

No one really knows how much the government in the United States really costs. Politicians and activists alike have a lot to say about taxation and spending, about how much things cost and, as currently the case in the debate over the Obama administration's effort to put more government in the healthcare system, about how much more expensive they are likely to get. But that is only part of the equation.

The truth is that no one really knows how much the level of government we have in the United States, in precise, absolute terms, costs the American taxpayers each day or even each year.

One effort to get to inside the ballpark when it comes to fixing government's cost is produced by the Center for Fiscal Responsibility and the pro-taxpayer Americans for Tax Reform Foundation, which each year calculate what they call "Cost of Government Day"—Cost of Government Day is the date of the calendar year on which the average American worker has earned enough in gross income to pay off his or her share of the spending and regulatory burden imposed by government at the federal, state, and local levels.

This year, in 2009, Cost of Government Day fell on August 12, 26 days later than in 2008, when it fell on July 16 and came later in the year than at anytime going back to 1977, the first year for which the date is calculated.

In simple terms, this means the average taxpayer has to work 224 days out of the year to earn enough in gross income just to meet the cost imposed by all levels of government.

The reason for the dramatic increase, says the groups' report, "is that all components of the cost of government—federal spending, state and local spending, and regulations—are now increasing faster than national income, which shrunk as a result of the financial crisis in 2008."

The data appear to bear out the claim, now that federal spending alone has reached a record 28.5 percent of U.S. Gross Domestic Product. But more than that, the report says, "The average American worker must labor 65 days in 2009 just to cover the costs of government regulations. This compares to 61.1 days in 2008, reflecting rapid growth in regulatory costs. This year, regulation is estimated to consume 17.7 percent of national income which, compared to 16.1 percent in 1999, is a drastic increase."

These are not precise measurements, but they do convey, in terms and images readily accessible to most Americans, a real sense of how much the government costs. Many politicians, including President Obama, one suspects, would rather beg the question of whether it's all worth it, which is why so many of them are canceling their town meetings over the summer recess or taking phone calls right in the middle of them.

The taxpayers who are coming to these meetings, on the other hand, seem to be giving voice to a shared sentiment that, whatever it costs, they're not getting what they pay for—which may be part of the reason so many of them are opposed to giving the government an even bigger role in the healthcare system.

 

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Because we're going broke nationally and don't want to add to the problem, somehow that means we get rid of all services?

Utterly ridiculous. We can't afford the government we have and you fools want to throw more gas on the fire. The middle class is MAXED OUT.

Do you freaking get it?

My teenage son is going to inherit a massive and crushing debt because of generations of "feel good" political solutions made without regard to consequence and we are going to hit a brick wall at high velocity around 2020. But hey, the Musers of the world have to feel good about themselves.

Funny, the pseudo-intellectual Starbucks leftists never seem to have the time to raise any kids of their own, they are far too important and self-absorbed for anything like that. The fact they they often feel so entitled to screw up the future for mine has me seething.

We can't put any more on the national credit card! Just because Bush was a financially irresponsible idiot does not give you the right to make it worse!

Jeff of MD 7:31AM August 15, 2009

I don't believe Roff wants to "end it all" as you state. To the contrary. I believe he makes valid points.

The core point I take from his article is that a bloated, expansive government and politicians who believe money solves all problems is not what this country needs.

Government today consists of thousands of programs of dubious worth and politicians who maintain their seats and are elected based on their ability to spend.

And now, at the worst time ever, Americans have a spend happy executive and legislature. These folks are not content with a mere 28% of US GDP. What these grifters want is to control 100% of GDP and they're almost 1/3 of the way there.

Think about it, folks. If elected officials were truely concerned about America's financial health, would they even consider or discuss a $1.5 trillion dollar health care program right now? Would they be signing off on massive spending bills and bailouts? Would we not see them dispensing with failed programs of little value or worth? Would they not be slashing and eradicating wasteful expenitures and implementing thrift? Wouldn't these officials treat taxpayer dollars as a sacred and solemn responsibility and see that each dollar represents an individual sacrifice to an American man, woman, or child? Would they not be more concerned about restoring America to financial health and prominence rather than granting millions of dollars to things like dirigible research and turtle tunnels?

So, my question, Muser of NM is this: if you contend that Roff's premise is obtrusive and that we, as American's are wrong to take issue with the "Cost of Government Day" (August 12th), then at what date would you actually begin to take issue--October 9th? November 1st? December 10?

August 12th is not just concerning, it's appalling! Aug. 12th means you and I have 141 days left in the year for the rest of us. Maybe we should have celebrated August 13th as "'Festivus' a day for the rest of us!" . . . to borrow a Seinfeld phrase.

David of ID 6:16PM August 14, 2009

Of course, there are some legitimate services provided by our various levels of govt. However, we have allowed the role of govt to grow so large and so expensive that we can not afford our bloated govt anymore.

We may end it all by going broke. It has happened before and will happen again.

Unfortunately, too many people look to govt as a source for handouts. This includes the poor and the wealthy. There is no free lunch. We shall all pay if we continue down this path.

Jim Bower of WA 3:32PM August 14, 2009

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement