Obama’s Healthcare Plan’s Support Shrinks as its Price Grows

July 20, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (36)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

For President Barack Obama, the news just keeps getting worse.

The tri-committee reform package released in the U.S. House of Representatives went over like a lead balloon. And things aren't going much better in the Senate, where Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., is taking his own sweet time moving the bill along. The versions of healthcare restructuring moving through both chambers give credence to the idea that any piece of legislation offered up by this Congress will be, in the words of Conservatives for Patients' Rights Kerri Houston Toloczko, "Too big to read and too expensive to pass."

The latter idea, that it is too expensive, got a considerable boost when Douglas Elmendorf, the director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, told the Senate Budget Committee Thursday that his office did not see "the sort of fundamental changes that would be necessary to reduce the trajectory of federal health spending by a significant amount. On the contrary, the legislation significantly expands the federal responsibility."

In plain English, the plans under discussion in Congress and backed by the Obama White House don't control costs and would only make things worse.

At the same time, a group of U.S. governors who should be Obama's friends on the issue voted thumbs down to the approach being contemplated. Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen, a Democrat, called the House bill "the mother of all unfunded mandates." New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, whom Obama had originally wanted in his cabinet, said he was "personally very concerned about the cost issue, particularly the $1 trillion figures being batted around."

Even worse for Obama, it is not at all certain the votes are there in the House for the tri-committee plan, the main vehicle for moving the issue forward. Over the weekend, Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, indicated the bill hit the ground with such an explosive thud that it was back to the drawing board, even as the majority continued to go ahead.

Hoyer and other members of the House leadership will also have to find ways to mollify a group of Democrats representing conservative districts, and who are less liberal than the majority of their colleagues, who have expressed concern about the cost and about the possibility that any Obama-backed plan would include taxpayer funding for abortions here in the United States.

 

If all that were not bad enough, a new report from the private-sector Lewin Group says the bill introduced last week in the House would lead more than 83 million Americans to be shifted from private healthcare coverage to the government-run public option. The report, commissioned by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, estimates that nearly half would lose their private coverage and that the government plan would have 103.4 million members once implemented, according to the Lewin analysis.

The reason for the dramatic shift, says the American Spectator's Phillip Klein, "is that the Lewin Group has anticipated that with government setting lower reimbursement rates for doctors, hospitals and other health care providers, the government plan will offer lower premiums than private plans. However, the flip side is that the Congressional Budget Office estimates providers will lose $361.9 billion in revenue over the next decade if the House bill is passed. That will mean lower quality of care, shortages in doctors and hospitals, and/or increased shifting of costs on to those with private health care. Should further cost-shifting occur, it will then in turn erode private health care coverage even more dramatically."

The more information that's out there, the less enchanted the American electorate is with Obama's vision of healthcare reform. A new ABC News/Washington Post poll finds that the country is almost evenly divided on this issue: 49 percent of Americans approve of the way Obama is handling healthcare, 44 percent disapprove.

President Obama has been trying to sell the American people on healthcare reform for three months, but the people aren't buying. Those who now strongly disapprove of his handling of healthcare outnumber those who strongly approve 28 percent to 22 percent. Hoyer is right. For the White House to have any hope of victory on one of its two signature issues, it is going to have to put on the brakes, turn around, and go back to the drawing board. Unfortunately, that seems to be the last thing on Obama's mind.

Tags:
health care,
health care reform,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (36)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

What gives Obama & Congress the right to make our healt care choices for us. It isn't good enough for them, but great for us

little peons. Why should we have to settle for less?

Our drs. don't have the choice to treat us now, as they should

& someone else should not have the right to tell us that we can or cannot have the treatments needed.

More considerations needs to be given to getting jobs back to

the USA & getting people back to work. More people could afford to buy health insurance.

Linda Nickell of KY 7:37PM September 08, 2009

God himself gave us freedom of choice which from as far as I am able to discern is more than our president is willing to do. I am certain that The Lord knows what is best for me, yet He allows me to make my own choices. I am not nearly as confident that the presidebt knows which way to turn. I am so tired of this foolishness about the government solving our problems. The government is our problem. Who among you believes that if you are in financial distress,that the best thing to do is go out and spend ever more money that you are borrowing. In the private sector, printing useless money is counterfeiting. What is the proper name for it when it is authorized by the president. As far back as I can recall, it was called inflation and was a poor move. We need to stop where we are and demand that the elected officials that we voted into office be accountable for this spending spree that they are on. From the word of God, it was up to the people of faith to provide for those who could not provide for themselves. I have never read a word in the Bible that says that the government should do that. We have a responsiblity to God to stand for what is right. I only owe the federal government taxes and money that they keep borrowing in my name and I for one, want it stopped.

Linda Hunt of AL 9:13AM August 26, 2009

I just had an idea. What if all the liberal democrats were allowed govern themselves how ever they want in their own part of the country. Then the the rest of us were left to run our part of the country how we wanted. I would be curious to see how that would size up. Only problem is i suppose that would become two nations at that point. Some states did it, why could we not do it on a national level. I find it totally unacceptable to live in a country with communist or socialist ideology. God Bless America, or what is left of it. By the way how many trillion dollars is this going to cost us, our children, their children? How many generations? What exactly is a trillion dollars anyway? Private Health Insurance works just fine. There only needs to be fine tuning and more regulation. To entirely replace it with government insurance is outrageous. We have the best Health Care in the world. What justification is there for an all out government take over? This is not about refining our Healthcare at all. This is a power grab by those with socialist and communist ideology. This is truly a fight between good and evil. God Bless

Art of FL 10:04AM July 26, 2009

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement