Cheney for President in 2012? Republicans Have No One Else

June 2, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

The sudden re-emergence on the political scene of former Vice President Dick Cheney is somewhat puzzling. Why would a man who has occupied positions of authority in Congress and the White House, been a success in business, and has a wife who works outside the home want to re-enter the arena when he didn't have to? Could it be that he is testing the waters for a 2012 run for the Republican presidential nomination?

Admittedly it would be a tough row to hoe but, looking around, who else have the Republicans at the moment got?

Having been the chief of staff in the Ford White House, the Republican Conference chairman and—for a brief time—whip in the House of Representatives, United States secretary of defense, CEO of Halliburton, and, finally, vice president for eight years, Cheney has an impressive record of experience that no one else can match. And, because he has dealt—more or less successfully—with economic, social, and foreign policy matters and was never considered a part of the so-called Christian Right, Cheney would unify and perhaps re-energize the Reagan coalition in ways that few if any of the potential GOP candidates could. As several conservative activist types with whom I spoke agreed, "He's solid on all the issues." And every time he goes on television lately, his approval numbers go up.

A Cheney 2012 White House bid is an intriguing prospect, and also a highly unlikely one.

Former Cheney White House aide Cesar Conda says he has the distinct impression the former vice president is "permanently retired from political office." But, musing on the hypothetical, Conda says, "Cheney would be driven by principles, not by polling data." And, against President Barack Obama, "He'd be the anti-politician running against a master politician and communicator."

Further, says Conda, "Cheney would run as an unabashed economic and national security conservative—an experienced grown-up who would be for lower tax rates, more economic freedom, and a strong national defense. On social issues, he's solidly pro-life, but believes same-sex marriage is an issue best left to the states, which as you say could give him broadened appeal."

But whether or not he could win, and not one person I spoke with thought he could, would depend heavily on the state of the economy, what is happening on the national security front, and whether or not terrorism had returned to U.S. shores.

So, if he's not running for president, why is he back on the Sunday shows, making a forceful case for the policies of the past eight years and showing more leadership than the many Republican elected officials who are wilting under the onslaught of the Obamacrats? Perhaps it really is just about setting the record straight, as one senior GOP official told me. "He's not thinking about running for president," the official told me. "He just got fed up with Obama getting a free ride criticizing what has been a spectacular and successful defense of the country for seven years."

As the Wall Street Journal's John Fund put it, the only reason Cheney "is able to be forthcoming is because he is not running for office," which is a sad commentary on the current state of affairs. Only the politicians who aren't running for office can speak with force and conviction. It is, after all, highly unlikely that Cheney would ever again attempt to climb, as Disraeli put it, "to the top of the greasy pole." It is unlikely, but not impossible, to overcome the tremendous negatives, to use the political term, he amassed while vice president. But it's an interesting idea.

Check out our political cartoons.

Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our new digital magazine.

Tags:
campaigns,
President,
politics,
republican party,
Dick Cheney

Reader Comments Read all comments (44)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Just had to fix a few typos on my previously posted comment that have been bugging me. Below I have written a revised version of the same comment I previously posted...

I agree. Dick Cheney is one of the only strong leaders left on the republican forefront. He may appear to be a heartless bastard, but he's a strong leader who had shown ability to take action as a leader. In contrast to Obama he seems very unflinching when faced potential controversy. He's willing to make risky decisions. If no strong democrat is willing to challenge Obama I feel we'll need a strong Republican challenger in the race.

I think Al Gore or Hillary Clinton should run though. Despite the off put both politicians' previous campaigns for presidency may provide, they both should consider running a possibility. In the 1960 presidential election, then Vice President, Richard M. Nixon lost to John F Kennedy. Nixon still was able to rebound and successfully elected president 1969. Nixon also succeeded to receive re-election in 1972. We all know Nixon at the very least appeared, and likely was, corrupt. We all realize he resigned due his speculation of his alleged involvement in the Watergate Scandal. I'm only using him as an example, not as a role model.

Nixon lost to Kennedy receiving just forty-nine point percent of the Popular Vote, and two hundred nineteen votes in the Electoral Collage. In the 2000 election Gore lost by technicality receiving the majority of the Popular Vote, but failing to receive Electoral Majority. He had once previously ran for president in the 1988 election, ultimately dropping out of the race. Hillary lost in a close race. She'd also be a fine candidate.

A unlikely alternate on the Republican front would be having George H. W. Bush (Bush Sr.) run. As stated it's unlikely, especially considering he'd by a large margin be the eldest president to serve. He'd also be only the second president, if successful, to serve two non consecutive terms after only Groover Cleveland. His health, additionally paired with his age, pose a threat to this possibility.

Cheney also, only by a small margin, would be the oldest person to assume the presidency. This though would be a minute factor considering that his age only would be a few years senior to Reagan (the eldest _resident to assume the office). The condition of his health though might pose an off putting question to voters.

Of course we always have the possibility of a wild card candidate, or a very strong third party candidate.

In the upcoming months we'll just wait to see if any new candidate arises with promise of positive leadership. We need a viable candidate. We need a good leader. But what makes a good leader in the first place is a huge debate.

Tyler Kochman of IL 6:37PM October 10, 2011

I agree. He's one of the only strong leaders left on the republican forefront. He may be a heartless bastard, but he's a strong leader. If no democrats is willing to challenge Obama I feel we need a strong Republican challenger.

I think we should have Al Gore or Hillary Clinton run though. Despite the off put both previous bids for presidency may provide them, they both should at least consider running. In 1960 then Vice President, Richard M. Nixon failed in his to John F Kennedy in his campaign, but still was able to rebound and succeed in his 1969 bid. He also succeeded to receive re-election in 1972. We all know Nixon at the very least appeared, and likely was, corrupt. We all realize he resigned due to the Watergate Scandal. But I'm only using him as an example, not as a role model.

Nixon lost by 49.6% to Kennedy. Gore lost (by technicality) with 48.4%. Hillary lost in a close race. She'd also be a fine candidate.

A unlikely alternate on the Republican front would be having George H. W. Bush (Bush Sr.) run. As stated it's unlikely, especially considering he'd by a large margin be the eldest president to serve. He'd also be only the second president, if successful, to serve two non consecutive terms after only Groover Cleveland.

Cheney also, only by a small margin, would be the oldest person to assume the presidency.

Of course we always have the possibility of a wild card candidate, or a very strong third party candidate.

In the upcoming months we'll just wait to see if any new candidate arise with any promise of a positive leadership. We need a viable leader, and also a good leader. But what makes a good leader in the first place is a huge debate.

Tyler Kochman of IL 10:54PM September 29, 2011

this is the only ticket that can bitch slap Obama ! Prove me wrong.

LiveAlchemy of WA 12:08PM May 01, 2011

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement