Obama's Notre Dame Speech Was an Alarming Violation of Church-State Separation

May 18, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

There are a number of dimensions to the controversy over Notre Dame's granting of an honorary degree to President Obama as well as to the speech he gave there at Sunday's graduation ceremony. As someone who is not Catholic—but who does have Catholic roots in my family tree—I had not intended to add my thoughts to the commentary so ably provided on both sides of the issues by so many others.

Having read the speech, after being urged to do so by my Thomas Jefferson Street colleague Mary Kate Cary in her Monday post, it occurs to me however there is much about its message that should give all people of faith reason to pause.

In his remarks the president urges the graduating class of Notre Dame to be aware that the challenges before them "require that we remake our world to renew its promise; that we align our deepest values and commitments to the demands of a new age." As I read that sentence, it means President Obama wants those in attendance to reorient their faith in ways that allow them, indeed compel them to address global problems—not as the church or as Pope Benedict define them—but as he and his political cohorts see them to be.

"This generation, your generation is the one that must find a path back to prosperity and decide how we respond to a global economy that left millions behind even before the most recent crisis hit—an economy where greed and short-term thinking were too often rewarded at the expense of fairness, and diligence, and an honest day's work," he said, using the language of politics and social organization rather than providing a scriptural basis for his assessments.

And again here: "Your generation must decide how to save God's creation from a changing climate that threatens to destroy it." And here: "We must find a way to reconcile our ever-shrinking world with its ever-growing diversity—diversity of thought, diversity of culture, and diversity of belief."

As I read it, President Obama is telling the "one, holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church," of the Nicene Creed that it must catch up with the times, be part of the change, and accept diversity of all kinds and stripes. Which sort of reminds of the scene in Hannah and Her Sisters when Woody Allen, thinking he is dying of a brain tumor, visits a priest in contemplation of conversion, talks about joining "the against school prayer, pro-abortion, anti-nuclear wing," of the church despite the fact that he still doesn't believe in God but has to believe in something.

Writing Monday for National Review Online, noted Catholic scholar and papal biographer George Weigel issued a caution of his own about the Notre Dame speech.

"What was surprising, and ought to be disturbing to anyone who cares about religious freedom in these United States, was the president's decision to insert himself into the ongoing Catholic debate over the boundaries of Catholic identity and the applicability of settled Catholic conviction in the public square," Weigel wrote, adding that "Obama did this by suggesting, not altogether subtly, who the real Catholics in America are."

As Weigel and other commentators have written, Obama's trip to South Bend, Ind., is part of an ongoing effort to hold on to the political support he received from Catholic voters in the November 2008 election. Catholics are a powerful voting bloc, having been on the winning side more times than any other religious demographic in the presidential elections of the postwar period.

Now, as Weigel wrote, he is trying to "settle the decades-long intra-Catholic culture war in favor of one faction—the faction that had supported his candidacy and that had spent the first months of his administration defending his policies." Even if President Obama had been paying attention to the sermons of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, this is a disturbing violation of the idea of the "wall of separation" between church and state of which Jefferson wrote in his famous letter to the Danbury Baptists.

Check out our political cartoons.

Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our new digital magazine.

Reader Comments Read all comments (98)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

1) To have Obama at Notre Dame is an outrage! John Jenkins, who

calls himself a Catholic Priest, has betrayad every American

Catholic who believes that Abortion is the killing of an

innocent child, who is ready to breath.

2) Cunning Obama got everthing he wanted. He knows that he will

need about 40% of the Catholic Vote in any upcoming election.

So he appeared reasonable/intelligent/ fair...etc etc.

What did Notre Dame, or Catholics get? Nothing! Nada!

3) To invite a pro-abortion person, to notre dame, is bad enough. But to give them an award! is even worse. Mister John

Jenkins should be fired at once. He laughed and make clowns

of the Catholic Bishops of America. Henceforth. . .I will spend

sevaral years writing to American Catholic Institutions. . . . .

asking them not to contribute an financial support ot Notre

Dame University. . .not even one penny.

4)Since John Jenkins doesn't understand the language of moriality (not anymore)....he still understands the language

of money. The people who now run Notre Dame U. would rather

be politically correct, than to be morally correct. They should

all resign. And John Jenkins should resign, or be fired.

5) The people who run Notre Dame are modern-day Pharasies. Those

are the kind of people that Jesus had trouble with. The keepers

of the Law! The ones who always wanted to be politically correct, above anything else!

6) The little babies at the abortion clinics, don't know anything about politics, or obama. But they are only moments

away from death. It's nice that Obama, and all other rich

politicians can clink thier wine glasses, at expcnsive

white house parties! Away from the abortion clinics. That

way they can't hear the screams coming from babies being

killed! Isn't it nice. . how everyting can be hidden, or

explained away, or sanitized? This shame is on all Americans.

7) We are all guility by participation, or by default. It wasn't

only the newborns that were killed, in the time of Jesus.

Now. . we "modern" americans are doing the killing, on a a scale

that would put the soldiers of Herod to shame. We and Red China

, and Russia, are showing the world hot it's done. How mass

murder is done! Does anyone really deney it? How about you,

dear Reader? What do you say? Frank R. Garcia

Frank R. Garcia of NM 2:09AM December 21, 2009

I guess everyone is entitled to an opinion, but it would be nice to read one that is informed.

The author prefaces by saying "as I read that sentence." He should be commended for acknowledging that he may be misreading it. However, he goes on to list such outlandish exaggerations that it's obvious he has not only misread, he doesn't much care what Obama said. He just wants to attack a bogeyman. Hurray if this were high school essay class!

But in the world of thinking adults this doesn't stand. It's not even credible.

And for the record, if "church-state" relations are really the issue, Eisenhower spoke at a Notre Dame commencement while a sitting president. Where is all the outrage about Eisenhower? Or for that matter, when Catholic bishops make pronouncements on political issues?

This piece is so inept it isn't worthy of being printed.

SH of NY 4:11PM September 13, 2009

You're fishing here, Mr.Roff.

Your contention that the speech was a violation of separation of Church and State is quite a stretch.

Vilnis Schulz of NY 2:15AM September 02, 2009

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. A former senior political writer for United Press International, he is currently a senior fellow at the Institute for Liberty and at Let Freedom Ring, a non-partisan public policy organization. His writing has also appeared on Fox News' Fox Forum.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Get God Out of the Gay Marriage Debate

The government shouldn't tell churches who they should marry, but neither should churches tell the government which marriages it can recognize.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement