Gingrich Is Right on Pelosi: Her Spin on Torture Is "Vicious and Dishonest"

May 15, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (33)

By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is on dangerous ground.

Her explanations about what she knew about "waterboarding" and when she knew it have been through so many printings they are already in the paperback edition. Having expected to use the torture issue as a hammer to whack the Bush administration well into the next election cycle—all the better to deflect attention from her party's legislative agenda—she now finds herself at the center of the debate herself, having now claimed the Central Intelligence Agency lied to her.

It's a risky move—sort of like swatting at a hornet's nest with a broom handle. You're just as likely to get stung as you are to knock it down. But Pelosi's charge that the CIA lied to her raises the stakes, as the Washington Post reported Friday, in the ongoing debate over who knew what about the interrogation methods used at Guantanamo Bay.

It also smacks of desperation and gives every appearance that Pelosi has unexpectedly been caught in a trap she designed to ensnare her political opponents, not herself. As the Post reported, "The intensifying argument over what the CIA told Pelosi and when comes on top of the debate over whether any Bush administration officials should face legal action for their roles in authorizing or implementing the interrogation policies and whether a national commission is needed to get to the truth."

Things have gotten so serious that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich weighed in with criticisms of his own. Rarely shy about using strong language to bring attention to serious subjects, Gingrich told ABC News that Pelosi continually evolving explanations amounted to "nitpicking in a fundamentally dishonest way."

Pointing out that, as the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee during the period in question, Pelosi was empowered to ask any question she wanted of the CIA representatives who briefed the panel. "She had an absolute obligation to know what was going on and she had an absolute obligation to speak up." If the right questions weren't asked, Gingrich said, "Its Nancy Pelosi's fault."

"She either didn't do her job or she did do her job and she's afraid to tell the truth," Gingrich said, adding that in his judgment she had lied to the House and to the country on a matter of national security and that a formal inquiry should follow.

And, given that the criticism comes from Gingrich, it is more than likely that a formal complaint will soon be lodged against Pelosi, who then risks becoming an albatross around the neck of many of her fellow Democrats. Because, as Pelosi herself has allowed to happen, the issue is no longer what she knew or when she knew so much as it is whether or not she can be trusted to tell the truth. And that's a position no politician ever wants to be in.

Check out our political cartoons.

Become a political insider: Subscribe to U.S. News Weekly, our new digital magazine .

Tags:
Nancy Pelosi,
Newt Gingrich

Reader Comments Read all comments (33)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I completly agree with you

Pete of TX 10:52AM May 19, 2009

Firstly in case everyone has forgoten, the USA had WAR declared on US at 911. The only concievable "war crimes" I can think of are directly targeting civilians AND murder of detainees in your care. Neither of these have occured at the hands of the US. BOTH have occured at the hands of the terrorists thugs that are willing to DIE if they can take ANY of OUR citizens with them.

Secondly the release of the memos by Obama was done purely for political gain (I'll explain that later) and the Democrats all jumped in the pool declaring that throwing water in a Terrorist's face was "torture" but are perfectly willing to support (and pay for with OUR money) CERTAIN DEATH of un-born Americans through abortion.

Lastly this is a WIN-WIN-WIN-WIN for Obama. He gets to attempt the continuing blame of the previous Administration, He gets to appease his liberal base by releasing these documents, He might get rid of Pelosi cause he hates to share the limelight AND when Dems and Republicans go down for this NON-CRIME HE gets to claim non-partisanship in his high moral standards.

He IS a great Politician which places him at the lowest form of human existance.

Chris Petty of GA 12:39AM May 19, 2009

This is hilarious!

Think about what happens if there's a torture inquiry:

Bush goes to jail.

Cheney goes to jail.

Rice goes to jail.

Gonzales goes to jail.

How many other Bushies end up in prison? 20? 50? 100?

Let's find out.

And who is insisting on an inquiry? President Obama? Nope.

It's Newt Gingrinch, Peter Roff, and the rest of the Republican 'brain trust' forcing the issue.

Bye-bye Bushies! And you can thank your 'friends' for the pretty orange jump suits.

jimatmadison of WI 9:38PM May 18, 2009

Peter Roff

Peter Roff

Peter Roff is a contributing editor at U.S. News & World Report. Formerly a senior political writer for United Press International, he’s now affiliated with several public policy organizations including Let Freedom Ring, and Frontiers of Freedom. His writing has appeared in National Review, Fox News’ opinion section, The Daily Caller, Politico and elsewhere. Follow him on Twitter @PeterRoff.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement